School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(4):185-9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100803. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
The evidence base for lifestyle monitoring is relatively weak, even though there are significant numbers of commercial installations around the world. We conducted a literature review to summarize the current position with regard to lifestyle monitoring based on sensors in the home. In total, 74 papers met the inclusion criteria. Only four papers reported trials involving 20 or more subjects, with a further 21 papers reporting trials involving one or more subjects. Most papers (n = 49) were concerned with technology development. Motion detection was the most common of the technologies employed, followed by door and electrical appliance usage. The predominant monitoring strategy was that of detecting changes in activity. However, little attention has been given to determining when or how changes in the profile of activity should be used to raise a call for assistance from a health or care professional. Lifestyle monitoring remains a relatively immature research area in which there is little detailed understanding of how to provide comprehensive and effective systems.
生活方式监测的证据基础相对薄弱，尽管世界各地有大量商业安装。我们进行了文献综述，总结了基于家庭传感器的生活方式监测的当前状况。共有 74 篇论文符合纳入标准。只有 4 篇论文报告了涉及 20 名或更多受试者的试验，另有 21 篇论文报告了涉及 1 名或更多受试者的试验。大多数论文（n=49）都涉及技术开发。运动检测是使用最广泛的技术之一，其次是门和电器的使用。最主要的监测策略是检测活动变化。然而，对于如何确定活动模式的变化何时以及如何应该用来向健康或护理专业人员发出求助信号，关注甚少。生活方式监测仍然是一个相对不成熟的研究领域，对于如何提供全面有效的系统，我们几乎没有详细的了解。
