• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌舌侧保持器存留的前瞻性临床评估。

A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hacettepe, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2012 Aug;34(4):470-4. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr038. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjr038
PMID:21508264
Abstract

Bonded retainers are considered reliable, independent of patient co-operation, and highly efficient. However, most studies regarding the survival of retainers are retrospective. The aims of this investigation were to prospectively evaluate the failure rate of bonded lingual retainers, the influence of direct or indirect bonding procedures on survival, and to determine the distribution of failures over a 6 month period. Mandibular lingual retainers were bonded in 66 patients. Thirty-two retainers were bonded using a direct method and 34 by an indirect method. There were 23 females and 9 males (mean age 15.96 ± 3.21 years) in the direct group and 29 females and 5 males (mean age 19.44 ± 6.79 years) in the indirect group. A 0.016 × 0.022 inch Bond-a-Braid retainer wire (eight-braided, flattened, stainless steel dead soft wire) was used with Transbond LR. Following bonding, the patients were observed monthly. A chi-square test was used to analyse the influence of the direct and indirect procedures on survival rate.Twenty-five retainers failed. The failure rate was 46.9 per cent with the direct method and 29.4 per cent with the indirect method. The difference between the methods was not statistically significant. The total failure rate was 37.9 per cent. The highest failure rate was seen in the first month. Seven patients had repeated failures. The failure rate was higher in the right quadrant. The total survival rate was 62.1 per cent.

摘要

带环保持器被认为是可靠的,不受患者合作的影响,并且效率很高。然而,大多数关于保持器存活率的研究都是回顾性的。本研究的目的是前瞻性评估粘结舌侧保持器的失败率、直接或间接粘结程序对存活率的影响,并确定 6 个月期间失败的分布情况。在 66 名患者中粘结了下颌舌侧保持器。32 个保持器采用直接法粘结,34 个采用间接法粘结。直接组有 23 名女性和 9 名男性(平均年龄 15.96 ± 3.21 岁),间接组有 29 名女性和 5 名男性(平均年龄 19.44 ± 6.79 岁)。使用 0.016×0.022 英寸的 Bond-a-Braid 保持器丝(八股编织、扁平、不锈钢软丝)和 Transbond LR。粘结后,每月观察患者。使用卡方检验分析直接和间接程序对存活率的影响。25 个保持器失败。直接法的失败率为 46.9%,间接法的失败率为 29.4%。两种方法之间的差异无统计学意义。总的失败率为 37.9%。第一个月的失败率最高。7 名患者出现反复失败。右侧象限的失败率更高。总的存活率为 62.1%。

相似文献

1
A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival.下颌舌侧保持器存留的前瞻性临床评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Aug;34(4):470-4. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr038. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
2
Survival of flexible, braided, bonded stainless steel lingual retainers: a historic cohort study.可弯曲编织粘结式不锈钢舌侧保持器的留存情况:一项历史性队列研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):199-204. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm117. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
3
Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period.正畸患者下颌固定保持器的间接粘接与直接粘接:一项单中心随机对照试验,比较6个月期间的放置时间和失败情况。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Dec;146(6):701-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.015.
4
Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers.V形圈与直丝舌侧保持器的粘结失败率。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.037.
5
Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 2-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial.正畸患者下颌固定保持器的间接粘结与直接粘结:保持器失败情况及治疗后稳定性的比较。一项单中心随机对照试验的2年随访
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.009.
6
Survival of bonded lingual retainers with chemical or photo polymerization over a 2-year period: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial.Bonded lingual retainers with chemical or photo polymerization: a 2-year, single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.030.
7
Lingual retainers bonded without liquid resin: a 5-year follow-up study.无液体树脂粘结的舌侧保持器:5 年随访研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jan;143(1):101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.008.
8
The reliability of bonded lingual retainers.粘结式舌侧保持器的可靠性。
Aust Orthod J. 2007 May;23(1):24-9.
9
Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study.两种多股舌侧保持器丝黏接于切牙釉质的黏接力和变形:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Dec;32(6):741-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq017. Epub 2010 Jun 13.
10
Periodontal effects and survival rates of different mandibular retainers: comparison of bonding technique and wire thickness.不同下颌保持器的牙周效果和存活率:粘接技术和线径的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Nov 15;41(6):591-600. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz060.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of survival rate and duration of maxillary and mandibular lingual bonded retainers - a retrospective cohort study.上颌和下颌舌侧粘结式保持器的生存率和持续时间比较——一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1048. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06314-6.
2
Effectiveness of CAD/CAM titanium fixed lingual retainer versus conventional stainless steel fixed retainer (randomized controlled clinical trial).计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD/CAM)钛合金固定舌侧保持器与传统不锈钢固定保持器的有效性比较(随机对照临床试验)
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 18;29(7):343. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06418-x.
3
The prevalence of the failure of fixed orthodontic bonded retainers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
固定正畸粘接保持器失败的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Nov 30;45(6):645-661. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad047.
4
Risk factors for orthodontic fixed retention failure: A retrospective controlled study.正畸固定保持失败的危险因素:一项回顾性对照研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Nov 25;53(6):365-373. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.012. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
5
Survival rates of mandibular fixed retainers: comparison of a tube-type retainer and conventional multistrand retainers : A prospective randomized clinical trial.下颌固定保持器的存活率:管型保持器与传统多股保持器的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Sep;85(5):309-316. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00447-5. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Orthodontic Retainers-A Critical Review.正畸保持器——一项批判性综述
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;10(2):230. doi: 10.3390/children10020230.
7
Comparison of periodontal status and failure rates with different retainer bonding methods and adhesives: a randomized clinical trial.不同固位体粘结方法和粘结剂对牙周状况和失败率的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Jan 1;93(1):57-65. doi: 10.2319/031622-224.1.
8
Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.CAD/CAM 与传统多股结扎丝固定保持器在正畸患者中的稳定性、存活率和患者满意度:一项为期 6 个月的双中心随机对照临床试验的随访。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Feb 10;45(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac042.
9
What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? - systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.固定正畸保持失败的原因是什么?——临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Head Face Med. 2021 Jul 24;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00281-3.
10
The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces.正畸保持器的材料类型和位置在抵抗轴向力或颊向力方面的作用。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 29;14(9):2319. doi: 10.3390/ma14092319.