Suppr超能文献

自粘性树脂复合材料释放的单体更多吗?一种比较高效液相色谱分析。

Do Self-adhesive Resin Composites Release More Monomers? A Comparative High-performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2022 Aug 18;24:301-311. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3240709.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To comparatively evaluate the elution of residual monomers (bis-GMA, bis-EMA, TEG-DMA, and HEMA) from two self-adhesive flowable resin composites, a giomer, and a nano-flowable resin composite over five different time intervals, using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four flowable resin composites were investigated (Vertise Flow, Constic, Beautifil Flow Plus F03, and Filtek Z350 XT). Immediately after polymerization, each sample was immersed in 75% ethanol/water solution and stored in amber-colored bottles at room temperature. HPLC analysis was performed at predefined time intervals: 1 h, 24 h, 4 days, 8 days and 16 days. The extraction solution was changed after each analysis. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The highest mean concentration of residual monomers was eluted from Beautifil, followed by Filtek, and both were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean concentration of eluates from self-adhesive resin composites (Vertise Flow and Constic). Vertise Flow released significantly higher concentrations of HEMA than all the other tested materials. At 1 h post-immersion, 52.2% of monomers were eluted, and continued to elute at a reduced rate throughout the study duration. TEG-DMA was the fastest monomer to leach out, while bis-GMA exhibited significantly higher total mean concentration. The elution rate was significantly dependent on the molecular weight of the eluted monomers.

CONCLUSION

No specific elution behavior can be attributed to self-adhesive RBCs. Elution of residual monomers is dependent on each material's composition, resin matrix characteristics, and the monomer's molecular weight.

摘要

目的

使用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)比较两种自粘结流动树脂复合材料、一种玻璃离子和一种纳米流动树脂复合材料在五个不同时间间隔内残留单体(双 GMA、双 EMA、TEG-DMA 和 HEMA)的洗脱情况。

材料与方法

研究了四种流动树脂复合材料(Vertise Flow、Constic、Beautifil Flow Plus F03 和 Filtek Z350 XT)。聚合后立即将每个样本浸入 75%乙醇/水溶液中,并储存在棕色瓶中于室温下。在预定义的时间间隔(1 h、24 h、4 天、8 天和 16 天)进行 HPLC 分析。每次分析后更换提取溶液。使用重复测量方差分析和单因素方差分析进行数据分析,并进行 Tukey 事后检验,p<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

从 Beautifil 洗脱的残留单体平均浓度最高,其次是 Filtek,均明显高于自粘结树脂复合材料(Vertise Flow 和 Constic)的洗脱平均浓度(p<0.05)。Vertise Flow 释放的 HEMA 浓度明显高于所有其他测试材料。在浸泡后 1 h,有 52.2%的单体被洗脱,并在整个研究期间以较低的速率继续洗脱。TEG-DMA 是最早被洗脱出来的单体,而双 GMA 表现出明显更高的总平均浓度。洗脱率明显取决于洗脱单体的分子量。

结论

不能将特定的洗脱行为归因于自粘结 RBCs。残留单体的洗脱取决于每种材料的组成、树脂基质特性和单体的分子量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/168b/11734319/5a213836ac53/jad-24-301-g001.jpg

相似文献

3
HPLC analysis of eluted monomers from two composite resins cured with LED and halogen curing lights.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Jan;88(1):191-6. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31167.
4
Elution of monomer from different bulk fill dental composite resins.
Dent Mater. 2015 Jul;31(7):e141-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.008.
5
Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Jul;74(1):617-26. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30252.
6
Analysis of long-term monomer elution from bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites using high performance liquid chromatography.
Dent Mater. 2015 Dec;31(12):1587-98. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
Monomer elution from nanohybrid and ormocer-based composites cured with different light sources.
Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.017. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
8
Evaluation of the amount of residual monomer released from different flowable composite resins.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04005-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of bonding performance and multi-ion release of S-PRG fillercontaining self-adhesive resin composite.
Dent Mater J. 2021 Sep 30;40(5):1257-1263. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-142. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
2
Cytotoxicity of Different Composite Resins on Human Gingival Fibroblast Cell Lines.
Biomimetics (Basel). 2021 Apr 20;6(2):26. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics6020026.
3
Bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite resins to dental tissues: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):876-885. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
Evaluating Ceramic Repair Materials in Terms of Bond Strength and Color Stability.
Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Sep/Oct;33(5):536-545. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6760.
7
Resin based restorative dental materials: characteristics and future perspectives.
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2019 Nov;55(1):126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Hydrolytic and Biological Degradation of Bulk-fill and Self-adhering Resin Composites.
Oper Dent. 2019 Sep/Oct;44(5):E223-E233. doi: 10.2341/17-390-L. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
9
Effect of nano-bioceramics on monomer leaching and degree of conversion of resin-based composites.
Dent Mater J. 2018 Nov 30;37(6):940-949. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-338. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验