Suppr超能文献

临床心理学家基于理论的心理障碍表征会预测他们的诊断推理和记忆。

Clinical psychologists' theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory.

作者信息

Kim Nancy S, Ahn Woo-kyoung

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, P.O. Box 208205, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8205, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Dec;131(4):451-76.

Abstract

The theory-based model of categorization posits that concepts are represented as theories, not feature lists. Thus, it is interesting that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) established atheoretical guidelines for mental disorder diagnosis. Five experiments investigated how clinicians handled an atheoretical nosology. Clinicians' causal theories of disorders and their responses on diagnostic and memory tasks were measured. Participants were more likely to diagnose a hypothetical patient with a disorder if that patient had causally central rather than causally peripheral symptoms according to their theory of the disorder. Their memory for causally central symptoms was also biased. Clinicians are cognitively driven to use theories despite decades of practice with the atheoretical DSM.

摘要

基于理论的分类模型假定概念是以理论而非特征列表的形式来表征的。因此,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版;DSM-IV;美国精神病学协会,1994年)为精神障碍诊断制定了无理论依据的指导方针,这一点很有意思。五项实验研究了临床医生如何处理无理论依据的疾病分类法。测量了临床医生对疾病的因果理论以及他们在诊断和记忆任务中的反应。如果根据他们对某种疾病的理论,假设患者具有因果关系核心症状而非因果关系边缘症状,那么参与者更有可能诊断该患者患有该疾病。他们对因果关系核心症状的记忆也存在偏差。尽管临床医生已经依据无理论依据的DSM进行了数十年的实践,但他们在认知上仍倾向于使用理论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验