• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

军队“性骚扰”标准衡量方法因教育和性别而存在不可靠性和误差。

Unreliability and error in the military's "gold standard" measure of sexual harassment by education and gender.

机构信息

Center for Chronic Disease Outcome Research, Department of Medicine, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Dissociation. 2011;12(3):216-31. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2011.551506.

DOI:10.1080/15299732.2011.551506
PMID:21534092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6483080/
Abstract

The Department of Defense's "gold standard" sexual harassment measure, the Sexual Harassment Core Measure (SHCore), is based on an earlier measure that was developed primarily in college women. Furthermore, the SHCore requires a reading grade level of 9.1. This may be higher than some troops' reading abilities and could generate unreliable estimates of their sexual harassment experiences. Results from 108 male and 96 female soldiers showed that the SHCore's temporal stability and alternate-forms reliability was significantly worse (a) in soldiers without college experience compared to soldiers with college experience and (b) in men compared to women. For men without college experience, almost 80% of the temporal variance in SHCore scores was attributable to error. A plain language version of the SHCore had mixed effects on temporal stability depending on education and gender. The SHCore may be particularly ill suited for evaluating population trends of sexual harassment in military men without college experience.

摘要

美国国防部的“金标准”性骚扰衡量标准,即性骚扰核心衡量标准(SHCore),是基于早期主要在女大学生中开发的衡量标准。此外,SHCore 需要阅读水平达到 9.1 级。这可能高于一些部队的阅读能力,并且可能会对他们的性骚扰经历产生不可靠的估计。对 108 名男性和 96 名女性士兵的结果表明,(a)与有大学经历的士兵相比,没有大学经历的士兵和(b)与女性相比,SHCore 的时间稳定性和替代形式可靠性明显更差。对于没有大学经历的男性,SHCore 得分的时间变化中几乎 80%归因于误差。SHCore 的通俗版本的时间稳定性因教育程度和性别而异,效果不一。SHCore 可能特别不适合评估没有大学经历的军人中性骚扰的人口趋势。

相似文献

1
Unreliability and error in the military's "gold standard" measure of sexual harassment by education and gender.军队“性骚扰”标准衡量方法因教育和性别而存在不可靠性和误差。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2011;12(3):216-31. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2011.551506.
2
Psychological effects of sexual harassment, appraisal of harassment, and organizational climate among U.S. Army soldiers.美国陆军士兵中性骚扰的心理影响、对骚扰的评估及组织氛围
Mil Med. 1998 Feb;163(2):63-7.
3
Personality characteristics that increase vulnerability to sexual harassment among U.S. Army soldiers.增加美国陆军士兵遭受性骚扰易感性的人格特征。
Mil Med. 2000 Oct;165(10):709-13.
4
Local social norms and military sexual stressors: do senior officers' norms matter?当地社会规范与军事性应激源:高级军官的规范重要吗?
Mil Med. 2009 Oct;174(10):1100-4. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-04-2308.
5
Sex differences in the factor structure of a modified Sexual Experiences Questionnaire.改良版性经历问卷因子结构中的性别差异
Psychol Rep. 2010 Dec;107(3):773-83. doi: 10.2466/03.08.16.PR0.107.6.773-783.
6
Sexual harassment experiences and harmful alcohol use in a military sample: differences in gender and the mediating role of depression.军事样本中的性骚扰经历与有害饮酒行为:性别差异及抑郁的中介作用
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 May;69(3):348-51. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.348.
7
The Prevalence of Sexual Harassment and Bullying Among Norwegian Afghanistan Veterans: Does Workplace Harassment Disproportionately Impact the Mental Health and Life Satisfaction of Female Soldiers?挪威阿富汗退伍军人中性骚扰和欺凌的流行情况:工作场所的骚扰是否不成比例地影响女兵的心理健康和生活满意度?
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Jan;40(1-2):465-488. doi: 10.1177/08862605241248432. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
8
Childhood maltreatment history as a risk factor for sexual harassment among U.S. Army soldiers.童年期受虐史作为美国陆军士兵遭受性骚扰的一个风险因素。
Violence Vict. 1998 Fall;13(3):269-86.
9
Unit support protects against sexual harassment and assault among national guard soldiers.单位支持可防止国民警卫队士兵遭受性骚扰和性侵犯。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Nov-Dec;24(6):600-4. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
10
The influence of sexual harassment on mental health among female military personnel of the Republic of Korea Armed Forces.韩国武装部队女性军事人员中性骚扰对心理健康的影响。
J R Army Med Corps. 2017 Apr;163(2):104-110. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2015-000613. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the Factor Structure of Military Sexual Stressors in Men Correspond to Women's? A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Using the Sexual Harassment Inventory.男性军事性应激源的因素结构与女性的相符吗?一项使用性骚扰量表的验证性因素分析。
Mil Med. 2016 Feb;181(2):161-6. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00709.

本文引用的文献

1
Response categories and anger measurement: do fewer categories result in poorer measurement?: development of the DAR5.反应类别与愤怒测量:类别减少会导致测量结果更差吗?:DAR5的开发
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;41(2):164-72. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0986-y. Epub 2006 Jan 1.
2
Deployment stressors, gender, and mental health outcomes among Gulf War I veterans.第一次海湾战争退伍军人中的部署应激源、性别与心理健康结果
J Trauma Stress. 2005 Apr;18(2):115-27. doi: 10.1002/jts.20018.
3
The role of sexual assault on the risk of PTSD among Gulf War veterans.性侵犯对海湾战争退伍军人创伤后应激障碍风险的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;15(3):191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.05.009.
4
A coefficient alpha for test-retest data.用于重测数据的α系数。
Psychol Methods. 2003 Mar;8(1):88-101. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.1.88.
5
Childhood maltreatment history as a risk factor for sexual harassment among U.S. Army soldiers.童年期受虐史作为美国陆军士兵遭受性骚扰的一个风险因素。
Violence Vict. 1998 Fall;13(3):269-86.
6
Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom?男性会遭受性骚扰吗?如果会,那么是被谁骚扰?
Law Hum Behav. 1998 Feb;22(1):59-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1025776705629.
7
Screening for pregnancy risk-drinking.孕期风险饮酒筛查。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1994 Oct;18(5):1156-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00097.x.
8
The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument.CAGE问卷:一种新型酒精中毒筛查工具的验证
Am J Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;131(10):1121-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.131.10.1121.
9
Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.衡量随时间的变化:评估评估工具的效用。
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5.