Suppr超能文献

经验回避度量的发展:多维经验回避问卷。

Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, E11 Seashore Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):692-713. doi: 10.1037/a0023242.

Abstract

Experiential avoidance (EA) has been conceptualized as the tendency to avoid negative internal experiences and is an important concept in numerous conceptualizations of psychopathology as well as theories of psychotherapy. Existing measures of EA have either been narrowly defined or demonstrated unsatisfactory internal consistency and/or evidence of poor discriminant validity vis-à-vis neuroticism. To help address these problems, we developed a reliable self-report questionnaire assessing a broad range of EA content that was distinguishable from higher order personality traits. An initial pool of 170 items was administered to a sample of undergraduates (N = 312) to help evaluate individual items and establish a structure via exploratory factor analyses. A revised set of items was then administered to another sample of undergraduates (N = 314) and a sample of psychiatric outpatients (N = 201). A 2nd round of item evaluation was performed, resulting in a final 62-item measure consisting of 6 subscales. Cross-validation data were gathered in 3 new, independent samples (students, N = 363; patients, N = 265; community adults, N = 215). The resulting measure (the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire, or MEAQ) exhibited good internal consistency, was substantially associated with other measures of avoidance, and demonstrated greater discrimination vis-à-vis neuroticism relative to preexisting measures of EA. Furthermore, the MEAQ was broadly associated with psychopathology and quality of life, even after controlling for the effects of neuroticism.

摘要

经验性回避(EA)被概念化为避免消极内部体验的倾向,是许多心理病理学概念化以及心理治疗理论中的一个重要概念。现有的 EA 测量方法要么定义狭窄,要么表现出内部一致性不令人满意和/或与神经质的判别效度证据不足。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种可靠的自我报告问卷,评估广泛的 EA 内容,与高阶人格特质区分开来。最初的 170 个项目被施测于一组大学生样本(N=312),以帮助评估单个项目并通过探索性因素分析建立结构。然后,一套修订后的项目被施测于另一组大学生样本(N=314)和一组精神科门诊患者样本(N=201)。进行了第二轮项目评估,最终得到一个由 62 个项目组成的 6 个分量表的最终 62 项测量。在 3 个新的独立样本(学生,N=363;患者,N=265;社区成人,N=215)中收集了交叉验证数据。该测量方法(多维经验性回避问卷,MEAQ)具有良好的内部一致性,与其他回避测量方法有很大的相关性,并且与现有的 EA 测量方法相比,与神经质的判别效度更高。此外,MEAQ 与精神病理学和生活质量广泛相关,即使在控制神经质的影响后也是如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验