• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已知接触过敏原的暴露限制能否简化?一项基于剂量反应斑贴试验数据的分析。

Can exposure limitations for well-known contact allergens be simplified? An analysis of dose-response patch test data.

机构信息

Department of Dermato-Allergology, The National Allergy Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, 2820 Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Jun;64(6):337-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01876.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01876.x
PMID:21535006
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allergic contact dermatitis is triggered by chemicals in the environment. Primary prevention is aimed at minimizing the risk of induction, whereas secondary and tertiary prevention are aimed at reducing elicitation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the elicitation doses that will elicit an allergic reaction in 10% of allergic individuals under patch test conditions (ED(10) patch test) for different allergens, and to compare the results with those for different allergens and with animal data indicating sensitizing potency from the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature was searched for patch test elicitation studies that fulfilled six selected criteria. The elicitation doses were calculated, and fitted dose-response curves were drawn.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with eight different allergens-methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone, formaldehyde, nickel, cobalt, chromium, isoeugenol, hydroxyiso hexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde, and methyldibromo glutaronitrile-were selected. The median ED(10) value was 0.835 µg/cm(2). The ED(10) patch test values were all within a factor of 7 from the lowest to the highest value, leaving out three outliers. No obvious patterns between the sensitization and elicitation doses for the allergens were found.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a rather small variation in the ED(10) patch test between the allergens, and no clear relationship between induction potency and elicitation threshold of a range of allergens. This knowledge may stimulate thoughts on introducing a generic approach for limitations in exposure to well-known allergens.

摘要

背景

过敏性接触性皮炎是由环境中的化学物质引起的。一级预防旨在最大限度地降低诱导风险,而二级和三级预防旨在减少激发。

目的

确定在斑贴试验条件下(ED(10)斑贴试验)引发 10%过敏个体产生过敏反应的激发剂量,同时将结果与不同过敏原的结果以及动物数据进行比较,这些动物数据来自文献中指示致敏能力的数据。

材料和方法

对满足六个选定标准的斑贴试验激发研究进行文献检索。计算激发剂量,并绘制拟合剂量-反应曲线。

结果

选择了十六项研究,涉及八种不同的过敏原,即甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮、甲醛、镍、钴、铬、异丁香酚、羟基异己基 3-环己烯羧醛和甲基二溴戊二腈。中位 ED(10)值为 0.835µg/cm²。ED(10)斑贴试验值在最低值到最高值之间相差 7 倍以内,排除了三个异常值。在过敏原的致敏和激发剂量之间没有发现明显的模式。

结论

我们发现过敏原之间的 ED(10)斑贴试验值变化较小,并且一系列过敏原的诱导能力和激发阈值之间没有明确的关系。这些知识可能会激发对引入针对知名过敏原暴露限制的通用方法的思考。

相似文献

1
Can exposure limitations for well-known contact allergens be simplified? An analysis of dose-response patch test data.已知接触过敏原的暴露限制能否简化?一项基于剂量反应斑贴试验数据的分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Jun;64(6):337-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01876.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
2
The dose-response relationship between the patch test and ROAT and the potential use for regulatory purposes.斑贴试验与 ROAT 之间的剂量反应关系及其在监管用途方面的潜在用途。
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Oct;61(4):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01607.x.
3
Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.羟基异己基 3-环己烯甲醛过敏:斑贴试验与重复开放应用试验阈值之间的关系。
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Sep;161(3):560-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09256.x. Epub 2009 May 27.
4
Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.镍过敏:斑贴试验与重复开放应用试验阈值之间的关系
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Oct;157(4):723-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08095.x. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
5
Elicitation threshold of cobalt chloride: analysis of patch test dose-response studies.钴氯化物的激发阈值:斑贴试验剂量反应研究分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2016 Feb;74(2):105-9. doi: 10.1111/cod.12499. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
6
Ethosome formulation of contact allergens may enhance patch test reactions in patients.接触过敏原的 ethosome 制剂可能会增强患者的斑贴试验反应。
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Oct;63(4):209-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01779.x. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
7
Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens.常见香料过敏原混合物引起的增强敏感性和激发反应。
Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Dec;65(6):336-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01945.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
8
Contact sensitization to metals in Taiwan.台湾地区对金属的接触性致敏反应。
Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Dec;59(6):353-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01468.x.
9
Cobalt-containing alloys and their ability to release cobalt and cause dermatitis.含钴合金及其释放钴并引发皮炎的能力。
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Mar;60(3):165-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01497.x.
10
Patch test results of the European baseline series among patients with occupational contact dermatitis across Europe - analyses of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network, 2002-2010.欧洲职业性接触性皮炎患者欧洲基本系列斑贴试验结果-欧洲接触性皮炎监测系统网络,2002-2010 年分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Mar;72(3):154-63. doi: 10.1111/cod.12333. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Thresholds for Contact Allergy to a Rubber Accelerator: TETD-Determined by Serial Dilution Patch Testing and a Simulated Glove-Use Model.橡胶促进剂接触性过敏的阈值:通过系列稀释斑贴试验和模拟手套使用模型确定的二硫化四乙基秋兰姆(TETD)
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Aug;93(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/cod.14817. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Preservatives in non-cosmetic products: Increasing human exposure requires action for protection of health.非化妆品产品中的防腐剂:增加人类接触量,需要采取行动保护健康。
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Nov;87(5):389-405. doi: 10.1111/cod.14181. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact.
接触性过敏反应-新兴过敏原和公共卫生影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 1;17(7):2404. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072404.
4
Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends.香料接触性过敏:当前临床与监管趋势
Allergol Select. 2017 Aug 4;1(2):190-199. doi: 10.5414/ALX01604E. eCollection 2017.