Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, BOX 356560, Seattle, WA 98195-6560, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Sep;26(9):1005-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1726-5. Epub 2011 May 4.
Many older adults who die by suicide have had recent contact with a primary care physician. As the risk-assessment and referral process for suicide is not readily comparable to procedures for other high-risk behaviors, it is important to identify areas in need of quality improvement (QI).
Identify patterns in physician-patient communication regarding suicide to inform QI interventions.
Qualitative thematic analysis of video-taped clinical encounters in which suicide was discussed.
Adult primary care patients (n = 385) 65 years and older and their primary care physicians.
Mental health was discussed in 22% of encounters (n = 85), with suicide content found in less than 2% (n = 6). Three patterns of conversation were characterized: (1) Arguing that "Life's Not That Bad." In this scenario, the physician strives to convince the patient that suicide is unwarranted, which results in mutual fatigue and discouragement. (2) "Engaging in Chitchat." Here the physician addresses psychosocial matters in a seemingly aimless manner with no clear therapeutic goal. This results in a superficial and misleading connection that buries meaningful risk assessment amidst small talk. (3) "Identify, assess, and…?" This pattern is characterized by acknowledging distress, communicating concern, eliciting information, and making treatment suggestions, but lacks clearly articulated treatment planning or structured follow-up.
The physicians in this sample recognized and implicitly acknowledged suicide risk in their older patients, but all seemed unable to go beyond mere assessment. The absence of clearly articulated treatment plans may reflect a lack of a coherent framework for managing suicide risk, insufficient clinical skills, and availability of mental health specialty support required to address suicide risk effectively. To respond to suicide's numerous challenges to the primary care delivery system, QI strategies will require changes to physician education and may require enhancing practice support.
许多自杀身亡的老年人最近都曾与初级保健医生接触过。由于自杀风险评估和转介过程与其他高危行为的程序不太可比,因此确定需要质量改进(QI)的领域非常重要。
确定医生与患者就自杀问题进行沟通的模式,以为 QI 干预措施提供信息。
对讨论自杀问题的视频记录临床相遇进行定性主题分析。
年龄在 65 岁及以上的成年初级保健患者(n=385)及其初级保健医生。
22%的就诊中讨论了心理健康问题(n=85),不到 2%的就诊中发现了自杀内容(n=6)。有三种对话模式:(1)争辩说“生活没那么糟糕”。在这种情况下,医生努力说服患者自杀是不必要的,这导致双方都感到疲劳和沮丧。(2)“闲聊”。医生以看似漫无目的的方式处理心理社会问题,没有明确的治疗目标。这导致了一种肤浅且具有误导性的联系,使有意义的风险评估被闲聊所掩盖。(3)“识别、评估和……?”这种模式的特点是承认痛苦、表达关注、引出信息并提出治疗建议,但缺乏明确的治疗计划或结构化的后续行动。
该样本中的医生在其老年患者中识别并隐含地承认了自杀风险,但似乎都无法超越单纯的评估。缺乏明确的治疗计划可能反映出缺乏管理自杀风险的连贯框架、临床技能不足以及缺乏有效解决自杀风险所需的心理健康专业支持。为了应对初级保健提供系统面临的自杀的诸多挑战,QI 策略将需要改变医生的教育方式,并且可能需要加强实践支持。