• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得堕胎服务:一种被忽视的健康差异。

Access to abortion services: a neglected health disparity.

作者信息

Dehlendorf Christine, Weitz Tracy

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, SanFrancisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 May;22(2):415-21. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0064.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2011.0064
PMID:21551921
Abstract

Minority and low SES women have persistently and disproportionately higher rates of abortion than White and higher SES women, yet have limited access to these services. The response of governmental health agencies to these disparities in abortion has focused solely on decreasing the number of abortions, without attention to access to needed health services. This commentary seeks to build an understanding of how access to abortion care is currently impeded for low-income women and women of color and calls for an end to that omission.

摘要

少数族裔和社会经济地位较低的女性堕胎率一直持续高于白人和社会经济地位较高的女性,且比例失调,然而她们获得这些服务的机会有限。政府卫生机构对堕胎方面的这些差异的应对措施仅仅集中在减少堕胎数量上,而没有关注获得所需医疗服务的机会。本评论旨在增进对低收入女性和有色人种女性目前在获得堕胎护理方面如何受到阻碍的理解,并呼吁结束这种疏漏。

相似文献

1
Access to abortion services: a neglected health disparity.获得堕胎服务:一种被忽视的健康差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 May;22(2):415-21. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0064.
2
Population Health Equity: Rate and Burden, Race and Class.人群健康公平性:比率与负担、种族与阶层
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):467-468. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19435.
3
Unequal access: insurance instability among low-income workers and minorities.不平等的获取机会:低收入工人和少数群体中的保险不稳定问题。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2004 Apr(729):1-6.
4
Understanding the factors underlying disparities in cancer screening rates using the Peters-Belson approach: results from the 1998 National Health Interview Survey.运用彼得斯-贝尔森方法理解癌症筛查率差异背后的因素:1998年国家健康访谈调查结果
Med Care. 2004 Aug;42(8):789-800. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000132838.29236.7e.
5
How commonly do US abortion patients report attempts to self-induce?美国堕胎患者报告试图自行堕胎的情况有多常见?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):23.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
6
Access to specialty mental health services among women in California.加利福尼亚州女性获得专科心理健康服务的情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Jun;56(6):729-34. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.6.729.
7
Medicare and communities of color.医疗保险与有色人种社区。
Medicare Brief. 2004 Nov(11):1-9.
8
Mortality Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the Veterans Health Administration: An Evidence Review and Map.退伍军人事务部中少数族裔群体的死亡率差异:证据综述和地图。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):e1-e11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304246.
9
Trends in health insurance coverage and access among black, Latino and white Americans, 2001-2003.2001 - 2003年美国黑人、拉丁裔和白人的医疗保险覆盖范围及就医机会趋势
Track Rep. 2004 Oct(11):1-6.
10
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing a Measure of Sexual and Reproductive Well-Being Aligned With Core Values of Reproductive Justice and Human Rights.推进一项与生殖正义和人权的核心价值观相一致的性与生殖福祉衡量标准。
Am J Public Health. 2025 Sep;115(9):1463-1471. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308119. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.《多布斯案后华盛顿州诊所网络中的堕胎服务提供情况和护理延迟》
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413847. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13847.
3
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
多布斯诉杰克逊案对患者和医疗保健提供者的公共卫生和临床影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024.
4
"Shouldn't Nobody Make a Woman do What they Don't Want to do with their Body": Black Women's Reactions to the Supreme Court's Overturn of Roe v. Wade.“不应该有人强迫女性做她们身体不愿意做的事情”:黑人女性对最高法院推翻罗诉韦德案的反应。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):968-979. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01577-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
Abortion-Related Laws and Concurrent Patterns in Abortion Incidence in Indiana, 2010-2019.印第安纳州 2010-2019 年与堕胎相关的法律和堕胎发生率的同时模式。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Apr;113(4):429-437. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307196. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
6
"": a qualitative, community-led medication abortion study with Black and Latinx Women in Georgia, USA.“”: 一项在美国佐治亚州针对黑人和拉丁裔女性的定性、社区主导的药物流产研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2129686. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2129686.
7
Willing but unable: Physicians' referral knowledge as barriers to abortion care.有心无力:医生的转诊知识成为堕胎护理的障碍。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec 14;17:101002. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101002. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Therapeutic termination of pregnancy and women's mental health: Determinants and consequences.治疗性终止妊娠与女性心理健康:决定因素及后果
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 19;11(11):937-953. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i11.937.
9
Racial/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States.美国限制堕胎政策差异和不良生育结果中的种族/民族和教育不平等。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07165-x.
10
Passage of abortion ban and women's accurate understanding of abortion legality.堕胎禁令的通过和女性对堕胎合法性的准确理解。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):63.e1-63.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 10.