• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺超声诊断表现和乳腺影像报告和数据系统 0 类钼靶下肿块病变的转归。

Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram.

机构信息

Diagnostic Imaging Division, Internal Medicine Department, School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(3):443-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300014.

DOI:10.1590/s1807-59322011000300014
PMID:21552670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3072469/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes and diagnostic performance of ultrasonography after a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (Bi-RADS) category 0 mammogram.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 4,384 consecutive patients who underwent a screening mammography from January 2005 to July 2006; 391 of the 4,384 exams were classified as Bi-RADS category 0. After exclusions, 241 patients received subsequent sonogram. Ultrasonography was considered diagnostic when the Bi-RADS category was changed to 2, 4, or 5, and it was considered indeterminate (Bi-RADS 3) when the results indicated that the patients should return for a mammographic follow-up. The outcomes of these patients were assessed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53.3 years (ranging from 35 to 81). Of the 241 patients, ultrasonography was considered diagnostic in 146 (60.6%) patients and indeterminate in 95 (39.4%) patients. In the diagnostic group, 111 out of 146 patients (70.2%) had a sonogram result of Bi-RADS category 2 after a 2-year follow-up without evidence of malignancy. Furthermore, 35 out of 146 patients (29.8%) had a suspicious sonogram with a result of Bi-RADS category 4. After a tissue sampling procedure, 10 patients were confirmed to have breast cancer, and 25 had benign histopathological features without any evidence of malignancy after a 2-year follow-up. The sensitivity of ultrasonography was 100%, specificity was 89.1%, and overall accuracy was 89.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the degree of resolution and its diagnostic performance, ultrasonography was determined to be an excellent method for the subsequent evaluation of Bi-RADS 0 mammograms.

摘要

目的

评估乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类 0 型乳腺 X 线摄影后的超声检查结果和诊断性能。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2005 年 1 月至 2006 年 7 月间连续 4384 例接受筛查性乳腺 X 线摄影的患者;其中 391 例检查结果为 BI-RADS 分类 0 型。排除后,241 例患者接受了后续超声检查。当 BI-RADS 分类变为 2、4 或 5 时,超声检查被认为具有诊断性;当结果表明患者应进行乳腺 X 线摄影随访时,超声检查被认为是不确定的(BI-RADS 3 类)。评估这些患者的结果以评估超声检查的诊断性能。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 53.3 岁(范围为 35 至 81 岁)。在 241 例患者中,超声检查被认为具有诊断性的有 146 例(60.6%),不确定的有 95 例(39.4%)。在诊断组中,146 例患者中有 111 例(70.2%)在 2 年随访中,超声检查结果为 BI-RADS 2 类,且无恶性证据。此外,146 例患者中有 35 例(29.8%)超声检查结果为 BI-RADS 4 类,可疑恶性。在进行组织取样后,10 例患者被确诊为乳腺癌,25 例患者的组织学特征为良性,且无恶性证据,在 2 年随访中无恶性进展。超声检查的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 89.1%,总准确性为 89.6%。

结论

基于其分辨率和诊断性能,超声检查被确定为 BI-RADS 0 型乳腺 X 线摄影的后续评估的一种极好方法。

相似文献

1
Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram.乳腺超声诊断表现和乳腺影像报告和数据系统 0 类钼靶下肿块病变的转归。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(3):443-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300014.
2
Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.随访乳腺超声检查中BI-RADS分类3类病变的进展:恶性率及可疑特征
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20170787. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170787. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.BI-RADS 类别 5 评估在诊断性乳房成像中的应用:基于病变描述符的结果分析。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(8):1048-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?人工智能能否替代超声作为乳房 X 光检查的补充工具来诊断乳腺癌?
Br J Radiol. 2021 Dec;94(1128):20210820. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210820. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.乳腺超声筛查中检测到的BI-RADS 3类病变的重新评估及随访结果
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar;206(3):666-72. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14785.
6
Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.BI-RADS 4 类微钙化患者自动乳腺超声检测与诊断:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 May 28;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01287-4.
7
Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?超声弹性成像能否帮助更好地管理乳腺 BI-RADS 4 类病变?
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Jun;22(4):e407-e416. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
8
A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound.乳腺钼靶和乳腺超声中BI-RADS 3评估类别的单中心审计
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023 Feb;74(1):69-77. doi: 10.1177/08465371221121706. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
9
Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.在国家乳腺数据库中,乳腺 X 线摄影筛查召回后 BI-RADS 3 类的癌症发生率和随访模式。
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):32-41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192641. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.基于BI-RADS使用标准的乳腺超声检查结果分类准确性
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;32(4):573-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.5191.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of breast cancer screening indicators in the female population using the National Health System, Brazil, 2018-2019: a descriptive study.利用巴西国家卫生系统评估 2018-2019 年女性人群的乳腺癌筛查指标:描述性研究。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023 May 8;32(2):e2022567. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222023000200009. eCollection 2023.
2
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening and diagnosis in a Brazilian metropolitan area.COVID-19 大流行对巴西大都市地区乳腺癌筛查和诊断的影响。
J Med Screen. 2023 Mar;30(1):42-46. doi: 10.1177/09691413221122055. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
3
The value of noncontrast MRI in evaluating breast imaging reporting and data system category 0 lesions on digital mammograms.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraobserver interpretation of breast ultrasonography following the BI-RADS classification.乳腺超声 BI-RADS 分类后观察者间的解读。
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jun;74(3):525-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.015. Epub 2009 May 6.
2
Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging.浸润性小叶癌:通过乳房X线摄影、超声、磁共振成像及乳腺专用γ成像进行检测。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):379-83. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3827.
3
Ultrasound screening of breast cancer.乳腺癌的超声筛查。
非增强磁共振成像在评估数字化乳腺钼靶摄影中乳腺影像报告和数据系统0类病变的价值。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Aug;12(8):4069-4080. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-968.
4
Clinicopathological features of breast cancer without mammographic findings suggesting malignancy.无乳腺 X 线摄影提示恶性特征的乳腺癌的临床病理特征。
Breast. 2020 Dec;54:335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
5
Use of Palpation Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Diseases: A Way to Improve the Detection Rate.触诊成像在乳腺疾病诊断中的应用:提高检出率的一种方法。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 28;26:e927553. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927553.
6
Survival Rates of Breast Cancer Patients Aged 40 to 49 Years according to Detection Modality in Korea: Screening Ultrasound versus Mammography.韩国 40 至 49 岁乳腺癌患者的生存率:筛查超声与乳房 X 光检查。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Feb;22(2):159-167. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0588. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images.使用超声图像上的BI-RADS放射组学特征对乳腺病变进行分类的机器学习软件的性能。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 Aug 5;3(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41747-019-0112-7.
8
Limitations of mammography in the diagnosis of breast diseases compared with ultrasonography: a single-center retrospective analysis of 274 cases.与超声检查相比,乳腺钼靶摄影在乳腺疾病诊断中的局限性:一项对274例病例的单中心回顾性分析
Eur J Med Res. 2015 Apr 21;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40001-015-0140-6.
9
Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.在乳腺钼靶检查显示乳房致密的女性中使用超声检查进行乳腺癌检测。
BMC Med Imaging. 2014 Dec 30;14:41. doi: 10.1186/s12880-014-0041-0.
10
Breast vibro-acoustography: initial experience in benign lesions.乳腺振动声成像:良性病变的初步经验
BMC Med Imaging. 2014 Dec 30;14:40. doi: 10.1186/s12880-014-0040-1.
Breast Cancer. 2009;16(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
4
[US and dense breasts: where do we stand?].
J Radiol. 2008 Sep;89(9 Pt 2):1169-79. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(08)73927-1.
5
BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome.BI-RADS 3、4和5类病变:超声在管理中的价值——随访与结果
Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):773-81. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071786. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
6
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.超声与乳腺X线摄影联合筛查与单纯乳腺X线摄影筛查对乳腺癌高危女性的效果比较
JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151.
7
Negligible advantages and excess costs of routine addition of breast ultrasonography to mammography in dense breasts.在致密型乳腺中,对乳腺钼靶检查常规加做乳腺超声检查的优势微乎其微且成本过高。
Tumori. 2007 Nov-Dec;93(6):562-6. doi: 10.1177/030089160709300608.
8
Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.对乳腺钼靶检查结果为阴性的致密型乳腺女性进行超声乳腺筛查:关于癌症额外检出率、假阳性及相关成本的证据
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Mar;44(4):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
9
Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.乳腺病变的检测与分类:屏-片乳腺摄影与软读片全视野数字化乳腺摄影的比较——观察者性能研究
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):37-44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041605. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
10
Conventional versus digital mammography in the analysis of screen-detected lesions with low positive predictive value.在分析筛查发现的低阳性预测值病变时,传统乳腺钼靶与数字乳腺钼靶的对比
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Aug;55(2):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.10.006. Epub 2004 Nov 18.