Jing Xin, Michael Claire W
Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0054, USA.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 May;40 Suppl 1:E74-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.21726. Epub 2011 May 11.
To evaluate the diagnostic pitfalls attributing to false suspicious interpretation of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), we performed a retrospective cytohistologic review of thyroid nodules diagnosed as suspicious for papillary carcinoma with histology-proven false suspicion of PTC. A total of 22 thyroid fine needle aspirates along with the corresponding surgical specimens were reviewed. The presence and/or absence of PTC-associated morphologic features and their mimics were evaluated. One aspirate showed papillary-like fragments with honeycomb architecture. One aspirate contained rare syncytial-type fragments which were accompanied by honeycomb sheets of follicular cells and moderate amount of colloid. Intranuclear grooves presented occasionally in virtually all 22 aspirates. The grooves were noted mainly within round nuclei and appeared thin and/or incomplete. Rare intranuclear pseudoinclusions were detected in one otherwise benign-appearing aspirates. Eight aspirates contained various numbers of histiocytes, as well as atypical polygonal, epithelioid, elongate, or spindle cells in which intranuclear grooves were occasionally seen. Conspicuous fragments of fibrocollagenous tissue with entrapped follicular cells were detected in one aspirate. The corresponding histological specimen revealed counterpart of the cytological findings described. Other features associated with PTC were inconspicuous. The findings demonstrated that the following factors may contribute to the false suspicion of PTC: (1) misinterpretation of papillary-like tissue fragments with honeycomb arrangement and fragments offibrocollagenous tissue with entrapped follicular cells; (2) overinterpretation of suboptimal intranuclear grooves and rare intranuclear pseudoinclusion in the absence of the other features of PTC; (3) misinterpretation of the polygonal, epithelioid, elongate, or spindle cells that actually represented atypical cyst lining cells.
为评估因对甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)进行错误的可疑解读而导致的诊断陷阱,我们对经组织学证实为PTC假阳性可疑诊断的甲状腺结节进行了回顾性细胞组织学分析。共回顾了22份甲状腺细针穿刺抽吸物及相应的手术标本。评估了PTC相关形态学特征及其类似物的存在与否。一份抽吸物显示具有蜂窝状结构的乳头状样碎片。一份抽吸物含有罕见的合体细胞样碎片,伴有滤泡细胞的蜂窝状片层和中等量的胶质。几乎所有22份抽吸物中偶尔可见核内沟。这些沟主要见于圆形核内,呈细薄和/或不完整状。在一份外观良性的抽吸物中检测到罕见的核内假包涵体。8份抽吸物含有不同数量的组织细胞,以及偶尔可见核内沟的非典型多边形、上皮样、细长或梭形细胞。在一份抽吸物中检测到含有被困滤泡细胞的明显纤维胶原组织碎片。相应的组织学标本显示了上述细胞学发现的对应情况。与PTC相关的其他特征不明显。结果表明,以下因素可能导致对PTC的假阳性怀疑:(1)对具有蜂窝状排列的乳头状样组织碎片和含有被困滤泡细胞的纤维胶原组织碎片的错误解读;(2)在缺乏PTC其他特征的情况下,对不太理想的核内沟和罕见核内假包涵体的过度解读;(3)对实际上代表非典型囊肿衬里细胞的多边形、上皮样、细长或梭形细胞的错误解读。