Soundarya Soundarya, Theresa-Sylvia S Mary, Srinivasamurthy Banushree Chandrasekhar
Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, PONDICHERRY, INDIA.
Turk Patoloji Derg. 2025;1(1):51-58. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2025.13787.
Fine needle aspiration cytology is the first line of investigation for thyroid lesions. Despite standard reporting formats, the diagnostic accuracy varies across institutions. In this study, we have reviewed our discordant cases on cytology and histopathology and analyzed the diagnostic errors.
The thyroid cases with discrepant cytology and histopathology reports for a period of five years were analyzed for diagnostic errors. The papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) cases were studied in detail for all diagnostic parameters. Nuclear scoring was used to improve the detection of PTC.
Of the 166 cases, 18 (10%) had discrepant diagnoses. The sensitivity was 65.62% (CI 46.81-81.43%), specificity 94.78%, positive predictive value 75%, negative predictive value 92.03%, positive likelihood ratio 12.56, negative likelihood ratio 0.36, false positive rate 5.2%, false negative rate 34.3% and accuracy 89.16%. False negative (malignant cases diagnosed as benign) was due to inadequate/wrong site sampling, benign clusters/ cyst macrophages, marginal flares, thin colloid, larger fragments of calcification, and subtle nuclear features. An interesting flower head-like structure was observed in PTC cases. Nuclear scoring on false negative cases improved our diagnostic accuracy. False positivity was due to vigorous aspiration and over-interpretation of nuclear features.
Analysis of our discrepant cases highlighted the importance of multiple passes, sampling all nodules, and ultrasound-guided aspiration to reduce sampling error. Application of nuclear scoring reduced overdiagnosis and missing out on PTC. Tissue fragments and hypercellularity were the major misleading factors in false positive cases.
细针穿刺细胞学检查是甲状腺病变的一线检查方法。尽管有标准的报告格式,但各机构的诊断准确性仍存在差异。在本研究中,我们回顾了细胞学和组织病理学结果不一致的病例,并分析了诊断错误。
分析了五年内细胞学和组织病理学报告不一致的甲状腺病例的诊断错误情况。对所有诊断参数详细研究了甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)病例。采用核分级来提高PTC的检出率。
166例病例中,18例(10%)诊断结果不一致。敏感性为65.62%(可信区间46.81 - 81.43%),特异性为94.78%,阳性预测值为75%,阴性预测值为92.03%,阳性似然比为12.56,阴性似然比为0.36,假阳性率为5.2%,假阴性率为34.3%,准确率为89.16%。假阴性(恶性病例诊断为良性)是由于取样部位不足/错误、良性细胞团/囊肿巨噬细胞、边缘光晕、稀薄胶质、较大的钙化碎片以及细微的核特征。在PTC病例中观察到一种有趣的花头样结构。对假阴性病例进行核分级提高了我们的诊断准确性。假阳性是由于用力抽吸和对核特征的过度解读。
对我们结果不一致的病例进行分析突出了多次穿刺、对所有结节取样以及超声引导下穿刺以减少取样误差的重要性。核分级的应用减少了PTC的过度诊断和漏诊。组织碎片和细胞增多是假阳性病例中的主要误导因素。