Lauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
J Theor Biol. 2011 Jul 21;281(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 May 11.
Humans and birds both walk and run bipedally on compliant legs. However, differences in leg architecture may result in species-specific leg control strategies as indicated by the observed gait patterns. In this work, control strategies for stable running are derived based on a conceptual model and compared with experimental data on running humans and pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). From a model perspective, running with compliant legs can be represented by the planar spring mass model and stabilized by applying swing leg control. Here, linear adaptations of the three leg parameters, leg angle, leg length and leg stiffness during late swing phase are assumed. Experimentally observed kinematic control parameters (leg rotation and leg length change) of human and avian running are compared, and interpreted within the context of this model, with specific focus on stability and robustness characteristics. The results suggest differences in stability characteristics and applied control strategies of human and avian running, which may relate to differences in leg posture (straight leg posture in humans, and crouched leg posture in birds). It has been suggested that crouched leg postures may improve stability. However, as the system of control strategies is overdetermined, our model findings suggest that a crouched leg posture does not necessarily enhance running stability. The model also predicts different leg stiffness adaptation rates for human and avian running, and suggests that a crouched avian leg posture, which is capable of both leg shortening and lengthening, allows for stable running without adjusting leg stiffness. In contrast, in straight-legged human running, the preparation of the ground contact seems to be more critical, requiring leg stiffness adjustment to remain stable. Finally, analysis of a simple robustness measure, the normalized maximum drop, suggests that the crouched leg posture may provide greater robustness to changes in terrain height.
人类和鸟类都用四肢支撑身体进行行走和奔跑。然而,腿部结构的差异可能导致物种特异性的腿部控制策略,这可以从观察到的步态模式中看出。在这项工作中,基于概念模型推导出了稳定跑步的控制策略,并将其与人类和雉鸡(Phasianus colchicus)的跑步实验数据进行了比较。从模型角度来看,用弹性腿跑步可以用平面弹簧质量模型来表示,并通过摆动腿控制来稳定。在这里,假设在后期摆动阶段,三个腿部参数(腿部角度、腿部长度和腿部刚度)呈线性适应。比较了人类和鸟类跑步的实验观察到的运动学控制参数(腿部旋转和腿部长度变化),并在该模型的背景下进行了解释,特别关注稳定性和鲁棒性特征。结果表明,人类和鸟类跑步的稳定性特征和应用的控制策略存在差异,这可能与腿部姿势(人类的直腿姿势和鸟类的蹲腿姿势)的差异有关。有人认为蹲腿姿势可以提高稳定性。然而,由于控制系统策略是过度确定的,我们的模型发现表明,蹲腿姿势不一定能增强跑步的稳定性。该模型还预测了人类和鸟类跑步的不同腿部刚度适应率,并表明,能够缩短和延长腿部的蹲腿姿势可以在不调整腿部刚度的情况下实现稳定的跑步。相比之下,在直腿的人类跑步中,地面接触的准备似乎更为关键,需要调整腿部刚度以保持稳定。最后,对简单鲁棒性度量(归一化最大下降)的分析表明,蹲腿姿势可能为地形高度的变化提供更大的鲁棒性。