Japan Biological Agent Integrated Consortium (JBASIC), Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1585-92. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110014. Epub 2011 May 15.
The aim of the Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept on Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy in Japan (JESMR) study is to compare the efficacy of continuation versus discontinuation of methotrexate (MTX) when starting etanercept (ETN) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
In total, 151 patients with active RA who had been taking MTX were randomized to either ETN 25 mg twice a week with 6-8 mg/week MTX (the E+M group), or ETN alone (the E group). The primary endpoint at Week 52 was the radiographic progression assessed by van der Heijde-modified Sharp score.
The mean progression in total score at Week 52 was not significantly different, statistically, between the E+M group and the E group (0.8 vs 3.6, respectively; p = 0.06). However, a significant difference was observed in radiographic progression between Weeks 24 and 52 (0.3 vs 2.5; p = 0.03), and the mean progression of the erosion score was negative in the E+M group, which was significantly better than the E group at Week 52 (-0.2 vs 1.8; p = 0.02). Clinically, the cumulative probability plot of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-N values at Week 52 clearly demonstrated a superior response in the E+M group than in the E group. ACR20, 50, and 70 response rates at Week 52 in the E+M group (86.3%, 76.7%, and 50.7%) were significantly greater than those in the E group (63.8%; p = 0.003, 43.5%; p < 0.0001 and 29.0%; p = 0.01, respectively).
MTX should be continued when starting ETN in patients with active RA. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00688103).
Etanercept 对甲氨蝶呤治疗后仍处于活跃期的类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性在日本的研究(JESMR)旨在比较在活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中开始使用依那西普(ETN)时继续或停止使用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的疗效。
共有 151 名接受 MTX 治疗的活动性 RA 患者被随机分为依那西普 25mg,每周两次,同时每周 6-8mg 甲氨蝶呤(E+M 组)或单独依那西普(E 组)。第 52 周的主要终点是 van der Heijde 改良 Sharp 评分评估的放射学进展。
第 52 周时,E+M 组和 E 组的总评分进展差异无统计学意义(分别为 0.8 和 3.6,p = 0.06)。然而,在第 24 周和第 52 周之间的放射学进展观察到显著差异(0.3 和 2.5,p = 0.03),E+M 组的侵蚀评分进展呈阴性,在第 52 周时明显优于 E 组(-0.2 和 1.8,p = 0.02)。临床上,第 52 周时美国风湿病学会(ACR)-N 值的累积概率图清楚地表明,E+M 组的反应优于 E 组。E+M 组在第 52 周时的 ACR20、50 和 70 反应率(86.3%、76.7%和 50.7%)明显高于 E 组(63.8%,p = 0.003、43.5%,p < 0.0001 和 29.0%,p = 0.01)。
在活动性 RA 患者中开始使用 ETN 时,应继续使用 MTX。(临床试验.gov:NCT00688103)。