School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
J Sports Sci. 2011 Jul;29(10):1029-39. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.570775. Epub 2011 May 23.
In this study, we investigated the effect of biological maturation on maximal oxygen uptake ([Vdot]O(2max)) and ventilatory thresholds (VT(1) and VT(2)) in 110 young soccer players separated into pubescent and post-pubescent groups.. Maximal oxygen uptake and [Vdot]O(2) corresponding to VT(1) and VT(2) were expressed as absolute values, ratio standards, theoretical exponents, and experimentally observed exponents. Absolute [Vdot]O(2) (ml · min(-1)) was different between groups for VT(1), VT(2), and [Vdot]O(2max). Ratio standards (ml · kg(-1) · min(-1)) were not significantly different between groups for VT(1), VT(2), and [Vdot]O(2max). Theoretical exponents (ml · kg(-0.67) · min(-1) and ml · kg(-0.75) · min(-1)) were not properly adjusted for the body mass effects on VT(1), VT(2), and [Vdot]O(2max). When the data were correctly adjusted using experimentally observed exponents, VT(1) (ml · kg(-0.94) · min(-1)) and VT(2) (ml · kg(-0.95) · min(-1)) were not different between groups. The experimentally observed exponent for [Vdot]O(2max) (ml · kg(-0.90) · min(-1)) was different between groups (P = 0.048); however, this difference could not be attributed to biological maturation. In conclusion, biological maturation had no effect on VT(1), VT(2) or [Vdot]O(2max) when the effect of body mass was adjusted by experimentally observed exponents. Thus, when evaluating the physiological performance of young soccer players, allometric scaling needs to be taken into account instead of using theoretical approaches.
在这项研究中,我们研究了生物学成熟度对 110 名年轻足球运动员最大摄氧量 ([Vdot]O(2max)) 和通气阈值 (VT(1) 和 VT(2)) 的影响,这些运动员分为青春期前和青春期后两组。最大摄氧量和 [Vdot]O(2) 与 VT(1) 和 VT(2) 相对应的数值分别表示为绝对值、比例标准、理论指数和实验观测指数。VT(1)、VT(2) 和 [Vdot]O(2max) 的绝对 [Vdot]O(2)(ml·min(-1)) 在组间存在差异。VT(1)、VT(2) 和 [Vdot]O(2max) 的比例标准 (ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) 在组间无显著差异。VT(1)、VT(2) 和 [Vdot]O(2max) 的理论指数 (ml·kg(-0.67)·min(-1) 和 ml·kg(-0.75)·min(-1)) 未对通气阈值的体重效应进行适当调整。当使用实验观测指数正确调整数据时,VT(1)(ml·kg(-0.94)·min(-1))和 VT(2)(ml·kg(-0.95)·min(-1))在组间无差异。[Vdot]O(2max) 的实验观测指数 (ml·kg(-0.90)·min(-1)) 在组间存在差异 (P=0.048);然而,这种差异不能归因于生物学成熟度。总之,当通过实验观测指数调整体重效应时,生物学成熟度对 VT(1)、VT(2) 或 [Vdot]O(2max) 没有影响。因此,在评估年轻足球运动员的生理表现时,需要考虑到比例缩放,而不是使用理论方法。