Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 18;11:335. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-335.
An increasingly significant public health issue in Canada, and elsewhere throughout the developed world, pertains to the provision of adequate palliative/end-of-life (P/EOL) care. Informal caregivers who take on the responsibility of providing P/EOL care often experience negative physical, mental, emotional, social and economic consequences. In this article, we specifically examine how Canada's Compassionate Care Benefit (CCB)--a contributory benefits social program aimed at informal P/EOL caregivers--operates as a public health response in sustaining informal caregivers providing P/EOL care, and whether or not it adequately addresses known aspects of caregiver burden that are addressed within the population health promotion (PHP) model.
As part of a national evaluation of Canada's Compassionate Care Benefit, 57 telephone interviews were conducted with Canadian informal P/EOL caregivers in 5 different provinces, pertaining to the strengths and weaknesses of the CCB and the general caregiving experience. Interview data was coded with Nvivo software and emerging themes were identified by the research team, with such findings published elsewhere. The purpose of the present analysis was identified after comparing the findings to the literature specific to caregiver burden and public health, after which data was analyzed using the PHP model as a guiding framework.
Informal caregivers spoke to several of the determinants of health outlined in the PHP model that are implicated in their burden experience: gender, income and social status, working conditions, health and social services, social support network, and personal health practises and coping strategies. They recognized the need for improving the CCB to better address these determinants.
This study, from the perspective of family caregivers, demonstrates that the CCB is not living up to its full potential in sustaining informal P/EOL caregivers. Effort is required to transform the CCB so that it may fulfill the potential it holds for serving as one public health response to caregiver burden that forms part of a healthy public policy that addresses the determinants of this burden.
在加拿大和其他发达国家,一个日益重要的公共卫生问题是提供足够的姑息/终末期(P/EOL)护理。承担 P/EOL 护理责任的非正式照顾者经常经历负面的身体、心理、情感、社会和经济后果。在本文中,我们专门研究了加拿大的同情关怀福利(CCB)——一个旨在为非正式 P/EOL 照顾者提供福利的缴费福利社会项目——如何作为维持提供 P/EOL 护理的非正式照顾者的公共卫生应对措施运作,以及它是否充分解决了人口健康促进(PHP)模型中涉及的照顾者负担的已知方面。
作为对加拿大同情关怀福利全国评估的一部分,在 5 个不同省份对 57 名加拿大非正式 P/EOL 照顾者进行了 57 次电话访谈,内容涉及 CCB 的优缺点以及一般照顾体验。使用 Nvivo 软件对访谈数据进行编码,并由研究小组确定出现的主题,这些研究结果已在其他地方发表。本分析的目的是在将这些发现与专门针对照顾者负担和公共卫生的文献进行比较后确定的,然后使用 PHP 模型作为指导框架对数据进行分析。
非正式照顾者谈到了 PHP 模型中概述的几个与他们的负担体验有关的健康决定因素:性别、收入和社会地位、工作条件、卫生和社会服务、社会支持网络以及个人健康实践和应对策略。他们认识到需要改进 CCB,以更好地解决这些决定因素。
从家庭照顾者的角度来看,这项研究表明,CCB 没有充分发挥其维持非正式 P/EOL 照顾者的潜力。需要努力改变 CCB,以便它可以发挥其作为解决构成健康公共政策一部分的这种负担的决定因素的一种公共卫生应对措施的潜力。