• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向药物创新的定义。

Toward a definition of pharmaceutical innovation.

作者信息

Morgan Steven, Lopert Ruth, Greyson Devon

出版信息

Open Med. 2008;2(1):e4-7. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

PMID:21602949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3091590/
Abstract

ONGOING DEBATES IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL SECTOR ABOUT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PRICING AND REIMBURSEMENT, AND PUBLIC RESEARCH INVESTMENTS HAVE A COMMON DENOMINATOR: the pursuit of innovation. However, there is little clarity about what constitutes a true pharmaceutical innovation, and as a result there is confusion about what kind of new products should be pursued, protected and encouraged through health policy and clinical practice. If the concept of pharmaceutical innovation can be clarified, then it may become easier for health policy-makers and practitioners to evaluate, adopt and procure products in ways that appropriately recognize, encourage and give priority to truly valuable pharmaceutical innovations.

摘要

制药行业中关于知识产权、定价与报销以及公共研究投资的持续争论有一个共同特点:对创新的追求。然而,对于什么构成真正的药物创新却鲜有明确界定,因此对于应该通过卫生政策和临床实践来追求、保护和鼓励何种新产品存在困惑。如果能够厘清药物创新的概念,那么卫生政策制定者和从业者或许就能更轻松地以适当认可、鼓励并优先考虑真正有价值的药物创新的方式来评估、采用和采购产品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c4/3091590/9bc05ad1aac2/OpenMed-01-e4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c4/3091590/9bc05ad1aac2/OpenMed-01-e4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0c4/3091590/9bc05ad1aac2/OpenMed-01-e4-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Toward a definition of pharmaceutical innovation.迈向药物创新的定义。
Open Med. 2008;2(1):e4-7. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
2
3
Balancing health and industrial policy objectives in the pharmaceutical sector: lessons from Australia.平衡制药行业的健康与产业政策目标:来自澳大利亚的经验教训。
Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Pharmacy Practice Innovation: Pharmacist Embeddedness as a Comprehensive Framework for Collaborative Practice.药学实践创新:药师融入作为协作实践的综合框架
Innov Pharm. 2023 Oct 10;14(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v14i2.4908. eCollection 2023.
5
6
A new approach to gathering pharmaceutical market data to support policy implementation and access to medicines: as demonstrated by malaria medicines in Zambia.一种新方法来收集药品市场数据以支持政策实施和药品可及性:以赞比亚的抗疟药品为例。
Malar J. 2018 Nov 29;17(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2594-9.
7
Effects of innovation and insurance coverage on price elasticity of demand for prescription drugs: some empirical lessons in pharmacoeconomics.创新与保险覆盖范围对处方药需求价格弹性的影响:药物经济学中的一些实证教训
J Med Econ. 2020 Sep;23(9):915-922. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1772797. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Health policy versus industrial policy in the pharmaceutical sector: the case of Canada.制药行业中的卫生政策与产业政策:以加拿大为例
Health Policy. 1997 Sep;41(3):241-60. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00036-5.
9
The Trans-Pacific Partnership and pharmaceutical innovation.跨太平洋伙伴关系协定与制药创新。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Jul-Aug;12(4):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement in China: When the whole is less than the sum of its parts.中国的药品定价与报销:整体为何小于部分之和。
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):519-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Fear of missing out: Drug availability in the United States vs Canada.错失恐惧:美国与加拿大的药物可及性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Dec;30(12):1349-1354. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.12.1349.
2
The application of multi-criteria decision analysis in evaluating the value of drug-oriented intervention: a literature review.多标准决策分析在评估以药物为导向的干预措施价值中的应用:一项文献综述。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1245825. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1245825. eCollection 2024.
3
The New Paradigms in Clinical Research: From Early Access Programs to the Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Unmet Medical Needs.

本文引用的文献

1
Expanding global research and development for neglected diseases.扩大针对被忽视疾病的全球研发工作。
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 May;84(5):414-6. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.029868. Epub 2006 May 17.
2
The patents-based pharmaceutical development process: rationale, problems, and potential reforms.基于专利的药物研发过程:基本原理、问题及潜在改革。
JAMA. 2005 Oct 26;294(16):2075-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.16.2075.
3
Disappointing biotech.令人失望的生物技术公司。
临床研究中的新范式:从早期准入计划到满足未满足医疗需求的新型治疗方法。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 13;10:111. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00111. eCollection 2019.
4
Pharmaceutical innovation: impact on expenditure and outcomes and subsequent challenges for pharmaceutical policy, with a special reference to Greece.药物创新:对支出和结果的影响以及药物政策随后面临的挑战,特别提及希腊
Hippokratia. 2014 Apr;18(2):100-6.
5
Assessment of the therapeutic value of new medicines marketed in Australia.对在澳大利亚上市的新药的治疗价值评估。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2013 Jun 13;6:2. doi: 10.1186/2052-3211-6-2. eCollection 2013.
BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):895-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7521.895.
4
"Breakthrough" drugs and growth in expenditure on prescription drugs in Canada.加拿大的“突破性”药物与处方药支出增长
BMJ. 2005 Oct 8;331(7520):815-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38582.703866.AE. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
5
Efficacy, safety, and cost of new anticancer drugs.新型抗癌药物的疗效、安全性及成本
BMJ. 2002 Aug 3;325(7358):269-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7358.269.
6
Drug development for neglected diseases: a deficient market and a public-health policy failure.被忽视疾病的药物研发:市场缺陷与公共卫生政策失灵
Lancet. 2002 Jun 22;359(9324):2188-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09096-7.
7
Industry-sponsored clinical research: a double-edged sword.行业资助的临床研究:一把双刃剑。
Lancet. 2001 Dec 1;358(9296):1893-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06891-X.
8
A look back at 2000: overabundance and deregulation.
Prescrire Int. 2001 Apr;10(52):52-4.
9
Users' guides to the medical literature: XIX. Applying clinical trial results. A. How to use an article measuring the effect of an intervention on surrogate end points. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.医学文献用户指南:第十九篇。应用临床试验结果。A. 如何使用一篇衡量干预对替代终点影响的文章。循证医学工作组
JAMA. 1999 Aug 25;282(8):771-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.8.771.
10
Are me-too drugs justified?仿制药合理吗?
J Nephrol. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(6):283-94.