Minty B D, Nunn J F
Ann Clin Biochem. 1977 Sep;14(5):245-53. doi: 10.1177/000456327701400168.
We undertook an external quality control survey of blood-gas analysis in 16 laboratories at 13 hospitals. All samples were prepared in the laboratories under investigation by equilibration of blood or serum with gas mixtures of known composition. pH of serum was measured with no significant bias but with an SD of random error 0.026 pH units, which was almost twice the SD of the reference range (0.015). An acceptable random error (half SD of reference range) was not obtained in a longitudinal internal quality control suvey although there were acceptable results for buffer pH in both field and internal surveys. Blood PO2 was measured with no significant bias but with SD of random error 1.38 kPa which reduced to 0.72 kPa by excluding one egregious result. The latter value was just over half of the SD of the reference range (1.2 kPa). PCO2 of blood was also measured without significant bias but with a much smaller SD of random error of 0.28 kPa (by excluding one egregious result), which was again just over half the SD of the reference range (0.51 kPa). Measurements of blood PO2 and PCO2 seem generally acceptable in relation to their respective reference ranges but measurements of pH were unsatisfactory in both internal and external trials.
我们对13家医院的16个实验室进行了血气分析外部质量控制调查。所有样本均在受调查的实验室中通过将血液或血清与已知成分的气体混合物平衡来制备。血清pH值测量无显著偏差,但随机误差标准差为0.026个pH单位,几乎是参考范围标准差(0.015)的两倍。尽管在现场和内部调查中缓冲液pH值结果可接受,但在纵向内部质量控制调查中未获得可接受的随机误差(参考范围标准差的一半)。血液PO2测量无显著偏差,但随机误差标准差为1.38 kPa,排除一个异常结果后降至0.72 kPa。后一数值刚好超过参考范围标准差(1.2 kPa)的一半。血液PCO2测量也无显著偏差,但随机误差标准差小得多,为0.28 kPa(排除一个异常结果),同样刚好超过参考范围标准差(0.51 kPa)的一半。血液PO2和PCO2的测量相对于各自的参考范围总体上似乎可接受,但pH值测量在内部和外部试验中均不令人满意。