Suppr超能文献

不同实验室中不同血气分析仪之间呼吸血气的仪器变异性。

Instrumental variability of respiratory blood gases among different blood gas analysers in different laboratories.

作者信息

Kampelmacher M J, van Kesteren R G, Winckers E K

机构信息

Centre for Home Mechanical Ventilation, Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1997 Jun;10(6):1341-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10061341.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in oxygen tension (PO2) and carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) values from measurements performed on different blood gas analysers in different laboratories are clinically insignificant. Samples of fresh whole human tonometered blood (PO2 8.1 kPa (60.8 mmHg); PCO2 5.3 kPa (39.9 mmHg)) were placed in airtight glass syringes and transported in ice-water slush. Blood gas analysis was performed within 3.5 h by 17 analysers (10 different models) in 10 hospitals on one day. The mean of the differences between the measured and target values was -0.01+/-0.19 and 0.21+/-0.13 kPa (-0.06+/-1.45 and 1.55+/-1.01 mmHg) for PO2 and PCO2, respectively. The mean of the differences between two samples on one analyser was 0.06+/-0.06 and 0.04+/-0.03 kPa (0.47+/-0.48 and 0.29+/-0.24 mmHg), respectively. For PO2 and PCO2 the interinstrument standard deviations (s(b)) were 0.18 and 0.13 kPa (1.38 and 0.99 mmHg), respectively, whereas the intra-instrument standard deviations (s) were 0.06 and 0.03 kPa (0.47 and 0.26 mmHg), respectively. Both for PO2 and PCO2 the ratios of s(b)2 and s2 were statistically significant (analysis of variance (ANOVA) p<0.001). The standard deviations of a random measurement on a random analyser were 0.19 and 0.14 kPa (1.46 and 1.02 mmHg) for PO2 and PCO2, respectively. We conclude that the variability in measurement of blood gas values among different blood gas analysers, although negligible, depends much more on inter- than intra-instrument variation, both for oxygen tension and carbon dioxide tension. Technical improvements and adequate quality control programmes, including tonometry, may explain why the variability in blood gas values depends mainly on errors in the pre-analytical phase.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验以下假设

在不同实验室使用不同血气分析仪测量的氧分压(PO2)和二氧化碳分压(PCO2)值的差异在临床上无显著意义。将新鲜的经校准的全血样本(PO2 8.1 kPa(60.8 mmHg);PCO2 5.3 kPa(39.9 mmHg))置于气密玻璃注射器中,并在冰水混合物中运输。10家医院的17台分析仪(10种不同型号)在一天内于3.5小时内完成了血气分析。PO2和PCO2测量值与目标值之间差异的均值分别为-0.01±0.19和0.21±0.13 kPa(-0.06±1.45和1.55±1.01 mmHg)。同一台分析仪上两个样本之间差异的均值分别为0.06±0.06和0.04±0.03 kPa(0.47±0.48和0.29±0.24 mmHg)。对于PO2和PCO2,仪器间标准偏差(s(b))分别为0.18和0.13 kPa(1.38和0.99 mmHg),而仪器内标准偏差(s)分别为0.06和0.03 kPa(0.47和0.26 mmHg)。对于PO2和PCO2,s(b)2与s2的比值均具有统计学意义(方差分析(ANOVA)p<0.001)。在随机一台分析仪上进行随机测量的标准偏差,PO2和PCO2分别为0.19和0.14 kPa(1.46和1.02 mmHg)。我们得出结论,不同血气分析仪之间血气值测量的变异性虽然可忽略不计,但对于氧分压和二氧化碳分压而言,更多地取决于仪器间而非仪器内的变异。技术改进和包括校准在内适当的质量控制程序,可能解释了为什么血气值的变异性主要取决于分析前阶段的误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验