Indiana University Health Goshen Center for Cancer Care, Goshen, IN 46526, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 2;364(22):2119-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012863.
Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone.
We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival.
The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine-interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2-only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine-interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2-only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06).
In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00019682.).
利用疫苗刺激针对癌症的免疫反应仍然是一个挑战。我们假设将黑素瘤疫苗与白细胞介素-2(一种免疫激活剂)联合使用可以改善疗效。在之前的一项 2 期研究中,接受高剂量白细胞介素-2联合 gp100:209-217(210M)肽疫苗治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的反应率高于单独接受白细胞介素-2治疗的患者的预期反应率。
我们在 21 个中心进行了一项随机、3 期临床试验,共纳入 185 名患者。入选标准包括 IV 期或局部晚期 III 期皮肤黑色素瘤,表达 HLA*A0201,无脑转移,适合高剂量白细胞介素-2 治疗。患者随机分为单独接受白细胞介素-2(720,000 IU/千克体重/剂量)或 gp100:209-217(210M)联合不完全弗氏佐剂(Montanide ISA-51)治疗,每周期一次,然后给予白细胞介素-2。主要终点是临床反应。次要终点包括毒性作用和无进展生存期。
两组在基线特征方面平衡良好,每个周期接受的白细胞介素-2量相似。毒性作用与白细胞介素-2 治疗预期的一致。与单独使用白细胞介素-2组相比,疫苗-白细胞介素-2 组的总体临床反应(16%对 6%,P=0.03)和无进展生存期更长(2.2 个月;95%置信区间[CI],1.7 至 3.9 对 1.6 个月;95%CI,1.5 至 1.8;P=0.008)。疫苗-白细胞介素-2 组的中位总生存期也长于单独使用白细胞介素-2 组(17.8 个月;95%CI,11.9 至 25.8 对 11.1 个月;95%CI,8.7 至 16.3;P=0.06)。
在晚期黑色素瘤患者中,与单独使用白细胞介素-2相比,疫苗联合白细胞介素-2的反应率更高,无进展生存期更长。(由美国国立癌症研究所等资助;临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00019682)。