• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无印模套管的种植体印模精度:三维分析。

Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jun;105(6):367-73. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60075-9.

DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60075-9
PMID:21640237
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Implant impressions without impression copings can be used for cement-retained implant restorations. A comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with and without impression copings is needed.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts that are fabricated by implant impressions with and without impression copings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An acrylic resin maxillary model was fabricated, and 3 implant replicas were secured in the right second premolar, first, and second molars. Two impression techniques were used to fabricate definitive casts (n=10). For the coping group (Group C), open tray impression copings were used for the final impressions. For the no-coping group (Group NC), cementable abutments were connected to the implant replicas, and final impressions were made assuming the abutments were prepared teeth. Computerized calculation of the centroids and long axes of the implant or stone abutment replicas was performed. The Mann-Whitney U test analyzed the amount of linear and rotational distortion between groups (α =.05).

RESULTS

At the first molar site, Group NC showed significantly greater linear distortion along the Y-axis, with a small difference between the groups (Group C, 7.8 ± 7.4 μm; Group NC, 19.5 ± 12.2). At the second molar site, increased distortion was noted in Group NC for every linear and rotational variable, except for linear distortion along the Z-axis.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant impression with open tray impression copings produced more accurate definitive casts than those fabricated without impression copings, especially those with greater inter-abutment distance.

摘要

问题陈述

无印模帽的种植体印模可用于粘结固位种植体修复。需要比较有和无印模帽的种植体印模的准确性。

目的

本研究的目的是评估和比较使用有和无印模帽的种植体印模制取的种植体最终模型的尺寸精度。

材料与方法

制作丙烯酸树脂上颌模型,将 3 个种植体模型固定在右侧第二前磨牙、第一和第二磨牙。使用两种印模技术制作最终模型(n=10)。对于带帽组(C 组),使用开放式托盘印模帽进行最终印模。对于无帽组(NC 组),将可粘结基台连接到种植体模型上,并假设基台为预备牙进行最终印模。对种植体或石质基台模型的质心和长轴进行计算机计算。采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验分析组间的线性和旋转偏差量(α=.05)。

结果

在第一磨牙部位,NC 组沿 Y 轴的线性变形显著更大,两组之间差异较小(C 组为 7.8±7.4μm;NC 组为 19.5±12.2μm)。在第二磨牙部位,NC 组在每个线性和旋转变量中都出现了更大的变形,除了 Z 轴的线性变形。

结论

与无印模帽相比,开放式托盘印模帽制取的种植体印模可产生更精确的最终模型,特别是在基台间距较大时。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.无印模套管的种植体印模精度:三维分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jun;105(6):367-73. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60075-9.
2
An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.种植体印模的准确性比较:编码愈合基台和不同种植体角度的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):90-100. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60346-7.
3
Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.不同印模台类型和形状的种植体印模精度。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):218-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00241.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
4
Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.用于多个种植体基台印模的三种技术的准确性评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):186-92. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.15.
5
Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.单颗牙种植修复病例中 master cast 的精度:一项体外比较。技术说明。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):455-60.
6
Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.种植体支持修复体的印模和灌注技术的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):226-36.
7
Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.种植体模型精度与印模技术及印模材料粘度的关系
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):669-74.
8
Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.种植体植入龈下深度对种植体印模尺寸精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60026-8.
9
An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.多内部连接种植体修复体印模技术的评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Nov;92(5):470-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015.
10
Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.评估使用不同夹板材料的多个牙种植体印模的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):38-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Methods of Obtaining Full-Arch Dental Impression (In Vitro Study).获取全牙弓牙印模的传统方法与数字方法的准确性(体外研究)。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 11;14(9):e29055. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29055. eCollection 2022 Sep.