• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术在三级医疗中心的成本效益比较。

Cost-efficiency of laparoscopic versus open colon surgery in a tertiary care center.

机构信息

Canadian Surgical Technologies and Advance Robotics, London Health Science Centre, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, PO Box 5339, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Nov;25(11):3597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1765-3. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-011-1765-3
PMID:21656072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-world cost analysis of elective laparoscopic versus open colon resection in a tertiary Canadian teaching hospital was performed to evaluate the financial impact of minimally invasive surgery with the appointment of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon in a single-payer system.

METHODS

A retrospective review of elective laparoscopic and open segmental colectomies (2005-2010) was performed. Combined cases and procedures performed for inpatients were excluded to minimize cost variation. The hospital case-costing system was used to calculate the hourly cost of operating room time and the daily hospital ward stay. The cost of disposable equipment was calculated manually. A cost-minimization analysis was performed from the hospital perspective, which excludes physician payment. Cases were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

For this study, 470 right-side colectomies (322 open and 148 laparoscopic) and 266 left-side colectomies (181 open and 85 laparoscopic) were found to match the inclusion criteria. The operating room time was longer for the laparoscopic procedures than for the open procedures: 203.4 versus 173.4 min (P = 0.1) for right and extended right hemicolectomy (RC) and 287.4 versus 173.4 min (P = 0.009) for left and sigmoid colectomy (LC). This resulted in higher operating room costs: $4,094.10 versus $3312.11 for RC and $5,784.88 versus $4,582.55 for LC. The median hospital stay for an index admission was shorter for both sides: 5 days versus 8 days (P = 0.01) for RC and 4 days versus 6 days (P = 0.04). This resulted in lower ward costs: $4,556.07 versus $6,632.82 for RC and $3,297.24 versus $5,949.09 for LC. The cost of care per index admission after laparoscopic versus open resection was $10,097.93 versus $10,444.69 for RC and $11,067.72 versus. $11,146.56 for LC. The introduction of laparoscopic surgery has saved our institution $58,021.43 over 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The reasons for observed differences in operating room time and length of hospital stay were uncontrolled and may be multifactorial. However, the results demonstrate that adopting a laparoscopic approach for elective colon surgery resulted in progressive financial savings.

摘要

背景

在一家加拿大的三级教学医院进行了择期腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术的真实成本分析,以评估在单一支付者系统下,由经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行微创手术的财务影响。

方法

对 2005 年至 2010 年的择期腹腔镜和开腹结肠切除术(RC 和 LC)进行了回顾性分析。排除联合病例和住院患者的手术,以尽量减少成本差异。使用医院病例成本核算系统计算手术室时间和每日住院病房费用。手动计算一次性设备的成本。从医院角度进行了成本最小化分析,不包括医生薪酬。病例采用意向治疗进行分析。

结果

在这项研究中,符合纳入标准的有 470 例右半结肠切除术(322 例开腹手术和 148 例腹腔镜手术)和 266 例左半结肠切除术(181 例开腹手术和 85 例腹腔镜手术)。腹腔镜手术的手术室时间长于开腹手术:右半结肠切除术(RC)和扩展右半结肠切除术(RC)的手术时间分别为 203.4 分钟和 173.4 分钟(P=0.1),左半结肠切除术(LC)和乙状结肠切除术(LC)的手术时间分别为 287.4 分钟和 173.4 分钟(P=0.009)。这导致手术费用增加:RC 为 4094.10 美元,1734.11 美元;LC 为 5784.88 美元,4582.55 美元。双侧初次入院的中位住院时间均缩短:RC 为 5 天和 8 天(P=0.01),LC 为 4 天和 6 天(P=0.04)。这导致病房费用降低:RC 为 4556.07 美元,6632.82 美元;LC 为 3297.24 美元,5949.09 美元。腹腔镜与开腹切除术后每次住院的治疗费用分别为 RC 为 10097.93 美元,10444.69 美元;LC 为 11067.72 美元,11146.56 美元。5 年来,腹腔镜手术的引入为我们机构节省了 58021.43 美元。

结论

观察到的手术室时间和住院时间差异的原因是无法控制的,可能是多因素的。然而,结果表明,采用腹腔镜手术治疗择期结肠手术可带来持续的财务节约。

相似文献

1
Cost-efficiency of laparoscopic versus open colon surgery in a tertiary care center.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术在三级医疗中心的成本效益比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Nov;25(11):3597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1765-3. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
2
Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.腹腔镜与开放乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病的成本结构:异同
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Apr;45(4):485-90. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6225-x.
3
A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.开放与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的临床及经济结局的全国性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4220-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
4
The impact of operative approach on postoperative outcomes and healthcare utilization after colectomy.手术入路对结肠切除术后结局和医疗保健利用的影响。
Surgery. 2022 Feb;171(2):320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
5
Short- and long-term costs of laparoscopic colectomy are significantly less than open colectomy.腹腔镜结肠切除术的短期和长期成本明显低于开放性结肠切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2128-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0909-1. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结肠切除术
Surg Endosc. 2007 Oct;21(10):1701-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
7
Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database.利用大型国家数据库评估择期机器人与腹腔镜结肠癌手术的临床结局。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7199-7205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10215-6. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
8
A cost comparison of laparoscopic and open colon surgery in a publicly funded academic institution.在一家公立学术机构中腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术的成本比较。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1213-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3311-y. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
9
A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection.开放性与腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术临床及财务结果的前瞻性病例匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):404-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9016-8. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
10
Cost savings for elective laparoscopic resection compared with open resection for colorectal cancer in a region of high uptake.在高采用率地区,与开放性切除术相比,选择性腹腔镜切除术治疗结直肠癌的成本节约情况。
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1515-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3345-1. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Procedural and post-operative complications associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗右半结肠癌切除的手术及术后并发症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022431.
2
Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF).德克萨斯州住院患者公共使用数据文件(PUDF)中腹腔镜结肠手术的应用情况。
JSLS. 2019 Jul-Sep;23(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00032.
3
Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy in colon carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of the DGAV StuDoQ|ColonCancer registry.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishment of a minimally invasive surgery program leads to decreased inpatient cost of care in veterans with colon cancer.微创外科项目的建立可降低退伍军人结肠癌患者的住院费用。
Am J Surg. 2010 Nov;200(5):632-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.015.
2
A cost-analysis comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy: the McMaster Institute of Urology experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的成本分析比较:麦克马斯特大学泌尿外科的经验
Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Aug;4(4):237-41. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.09166.
3
Systematic review of economic evaluations of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
腹腔镜与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:DGAV StuDoQ|ColonCancer 登记处的倾向评分分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218829. eCollection 2019.
4
Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer-a matched pairs analysis.腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术——配对分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;31(7):1291-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2590-x. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
A cost-minimization analysis of first intention laparoscopic compared to open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.腹腔镜一期手术与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的成本最小化分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Nov 19;5:23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.11.005. eCollection 2016 Feb.
6
Laparoscopic right colectomy reduces short-term mortality and morbidity. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术可降低短期死亡率和发病率。一项系统评价与荟萃分析的结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;30(11):1457-72. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2304-9. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
7
Laparoscopic versus open reversal of a Hartmann procedure: a single-center study.腹腔镜与开腹Hartmann手术逆转术:一项单中心研究
World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):2145-52. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2507-1.
8
Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.微创结肠切除术是否优于传统方法?:首次采用倾向评分匹配的全国综合检查。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Feb;149(2):177-84. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3660.
9
A cost comparison of laparoscopic and open colon surgery in a publicly funded academic institution.在一家公立学术机构中腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术的成本比较。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1213-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3311-y. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
10
MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.微创外科手术在结肠癌和直肠癌治疗中的应用:加拿大结直肠癌协会共识会议
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):3981-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3152-8. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
结直肠癌腹腔镜手术经济评估的系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;10(9):859-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01609.x. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
4
Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.根据COST研究组试验的5年数据,腹腔镜结肠癌切除术并不逊色于开放手术。
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762.
5
Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌切除术的随机试验:英国医学研究理事会CLASICC试验组的3年结果
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758.
6
Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术成本的系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Jun;50(6):908-19. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0234-5.
7
Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial).结直肠癌患者传统手术与腹腔镜辅助手术的短期成本(MRC CLASICC试验)
Br J Cancer. 2006 Jul 3;95(1):6-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603203. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
8
Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).腹腔镜结肠癌切除术:欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)共识
Surg Endosc. 2004 Aug;18(8):1163-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8253-3. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
9
Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.腹腔镜或开放结直肠手术后临床和财务结果的病例匹配比较。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000074967.53451.22.
10
In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.追求质量:国家临床优化研究所。
Lancet. 1999 Mar 27;353(9158):1079-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02381-8.