• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠手术成本的系统评价

Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

作者信息

Dowson Henry M, Huang Andy, Soon Yuen, Gage Heather, Lovell David P, Rockall Timothy A

机构信息

Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Jun;50(6):908-19. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0234-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10350-007-0234-5
PMID:17468985
Abstract

PURPOSE

Recent studies have confirmed the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal surgery; however, its use has not become widespread. One reason for this is perceived economic implications. A systematic review was undertaken examining the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for articles comparing laparoscopic colorectal surgery and open surgery. Primary outcome measures were operating room, direct hospital, and indirect costs. Secondary outcomes were conversion rates and length of hospital stay. The percentage difference in costs was used for comparisons between studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles were identified in which cost data were presented (total number of patients 3,681); the economic data in most studies was limited. Operating room costs were greater for laparoscopic colorectal surgery than open surgery in all studies (median difference, 50 percent; interquartile range, 27-78 percent; P < 0.001). There was no overall difference in total hospital costs (median difference, 0 percent; interquartile range, -17.5 to 21 percent). Only two articles collected data on indirect costs, with both in favor of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in all studies (median difference, 2.8 days; interquartile range, 1.3-3.7; P < 0.001). Median conversion rate was 7.8 percent (mean, 14 percent; interquartile range, 6-21 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Operating room costs are greater for laparoscopic colorectal surgery than open surgery. Total hospital costs are similar. There may be societal benefits associated with lower indirect costs for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Cost should not be a deterrent to performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

摘要

目的

近期研究已证实腹腔镜结直肠手术的临床疗效;然而,其应用尚未广泛普及。原因之一是人们认为其存在经济影响。本研究进行了一项系统评价,以考察腹腔镜结直肠手术的成本。

方法

检索电子数据库中比较腹腔镜结直肠手术与开放手术的文章。主要结局指标为手术室成本、直接住院成本和间接成本。次要结局为中转率和住院时间。研究间比较采用成本差异百分比。

结果

共纳入29篇呈现成本数据的文章(患者总数3681例);大多数研究的经济数据有限。所有研究中,腹腔镜结直肠手术的手术室成本均高于开放手术(中位数差异为50%;四分位间距为27% - 78%;P < 0.001)。总住院成本无总体差异(中位数差异为0%;四分位间距为 - 17.5%至21%)。仅两篇文章收集了间接成本数据,且均支持腹腔镜结直肠手术。所有研究中,腹腔镜结直肠手术的住院时间均较短(中位数差异为2.8天;四分位间距为1.3 - 3.7天;P < 0.001)。中转率中位数为7.8%(均值为14%;四分位间距为6% - 21%)。

结论

腹腔镜结直肠手术的手术室成本高于开放手术。总住院成本相似。腹腔镜结直肠手术间接成本较低可能带来社会效益。成本不应成为开展腹腔镜结直肠手术的阻碍。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术成本的系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Jun;50(6):908-19. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0234-5.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
9
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
10
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness and readmission rates of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: evidence from the health insurance review and assessment service dataset in South Korea.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗结直肠癌的成本效益及再入院率:来自韩国健康保险审查与评估服务数据集的证据
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 20;12:1543920. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1543920. eCollection 2025.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy: a comparative study of short-term economic and clinical outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术:短期经济和临床结局的比较研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 7;38(1):161. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04446-1.
3
Cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive, robotic and open approaches in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
微创手术、机器人手术和开放手术治疗结直肠肿瘤的成本效果比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 29;38(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04361-5.
4
Supervised training of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections does not adversely affect short- and long-term outcomes: a Propensity-score-matched cohort study.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的监督培训对短期和长期结果无不利影响:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar 29;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02560-y.
5
Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.经肛门内镜手术及经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的教育与培训
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 May;34(3):163-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718682. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
A comparative cost analysis of transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的成本比较分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00879-3. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.一项关于腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年人群中应用的全国性研究:现状和价值主张。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;23(10):965-972. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02082-y. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
The impact of surgeon choices on costs associated with uncomplicated minimally invasive colectomy: you are not as important as you think.外科医生的选择对单纯性微创结肠切除术相关成本的影响:你并非如你所想的那般重要。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018 May;6(2):108-113. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gox035. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
9
The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.机器人和腹腔镜结直肠手术的转换成本。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1515-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5839-8. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
A critical appraisal of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for oncological and non-oncological resections.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术用于肿瘤性和非肿瘤性切除的成本效益的批判性评估。
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0458-4. Epub 2017 May 10.