Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Germany.
Integr Comp Biol. 2009 Nov;49(5):563-79. doi: 10.1093/icb/icp037. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
With progressively faster global change, shifts in phenology, and distributional ranges are reported for an increasing number of species. The success of organisms at coping with novel seasonal conditions depends on the mechanisms that determine their schedules. Species that rely on fixed schedules and those that time their activities by predictive cues may be particularly constrained in their ability to accommodate changes. The present study examines rigid scheduling and its implications for breeding in captivity in an avian model taxon, the Stonechat (Saxicola torquata). Within their extensive breeding range, Stonechats differ geographically in migratory behavior and reproduce and molt under a wide range of daylengths (10-17 h). Stonechats time their activities by programs that involve circannual rhythms and photoperiodism. The study reports reproductive timing of four taxa (central European, Irish, Siberian, and Kenyan), relates it to laydates in the field, and investigates modifying influences of housing conditions and of social context. Reproductive consequences of timing programs were then tested by crossbreeding of taxa with different schedules. The study revealed persistent, population-specific breeding windows in captivity. Resident Stonechats from equatorial Kenya synchronized their reproductive cycles with the European summer, presumably in response to local photoperiod, and bred at similar times as northern migrants. In all other taxa schedules matched those in the field, but were timed slightly earlier in captivity and advanced by indoor keeping conditions. Influences of social context were negligible. In pairs with clutches, testes regressed slightly later than in pairs without clutches, but presence of a mate per se had no influence on breeding cycles. Accordingly, crossbreeding Stonechats were predicted to have limited capacity to adjust schedules to those of their mates. This prediction was tested by crossbreeding of single-clutched Siberian long-distance migrants with multiple-clutched European short-distance migrants. Males and females of both taxa retained their characteristic breeding schedules, regardless of their mate's activities. This led to dramatic loss of reproductive success in the population with the longer breeding season, European Stonechats. Siberian Stonechats were unable to profit from the presence of a sexually active mate, but they suffered no disadvantage from crossbreeding. In a changing world, inherited timing programs may severely constrain responses to novel conditions, impose schedule-dependent, asymmetric costs of hybridization, and contribute to directional gene flow or to reproductive isolation.
随着全球变化的加速,越来越多的物种的物候和分布范围发生了变化。生物体在应对新的季节条件方面的成功取决于决定其时间表的机制。那些依赖固定时间表和那些通过预测线索来安排活动的物种,在适应变化的能力上可能受到特别限制。本研究以石雀(Saxicola torquata)这一鸟类模式分类群为研究对象,研究了严格的时间安排及其对圈养繁殖的影响。在其广泛的繁殖范围内,石雀在迁徙行为上存在地域差异,并且在广泛的日照长度(10-17 小时)下繁殖和换羽。石雀通过涉及年节律和光周期的程序来安排活动。本研究报告了四个分类群(中欧、爱尔兰、西伯利亚和肯尼亚)的繁殖时间,将其与野外的产卵日期相关联,并研究了住房条件和社会环境的影响。然后通过具有不同时间表的分类群的杂交来测试时间安排程序的繁殖后果。研究揭示了圈养条件下持久的、种群特异性的繁殖窗口。来自赤道肯尼亚的留鸟石雀将其繁殖周期与欧洲夏季同步,可能是对当地日照的反应,并与北方迁徙者同时繁殖。在所有其他分类群中,时间表与野外的时间表相匹配,但在圈养中时间稍早,并因室内饲养条件而提前。社会环境的影响可以忽略不计。在有卵的配对中,睾丸的退化比没有卵的配对稍晚,但配偶的存在本身对繁殖周期没有影响。因此,石雀的杂交繁殖预计对调整时间表以适应其配偶的能力有限。通过对单窝西伯利亚长途迁徙者与多窝欧洲短途迁徙者的杂交繁殖来检验这一预测。两个分类群的雄性和雌性都保留了其特征繁殖时间表,无论其配偶的活动如何。这导致了具有较长繁殖季节的欧洲石雀种群的繁殖成功率急剧下降。西伯利亚石雀无法从性活跃的配偶的存在中获益,但杂交繁殖对它们没有不利影响。在一个不断变化的世界中,遗传的时间安排程序可能会严重限制对新条件的反应,施加与时间表相关的、不对称的杂交成本,并导致定向基因流或生殖隔离。