Suppr超能文献

非骨水泥翻修 TKA 联合骨缺损植骨可在 4 至 10 年内恢复骨质,翻修率较低。

Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

机构信息

Joint Reconstruction Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3164-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1938-3. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Addressing bone loss in revision TKA is challenging despite the array of options to reconstruct the deficient bone. Biologic reconstruction using morselized loosely-packed bone graft potentially allows for augmentation of residual bone stock while offering physiologic load transfer. However it is unclear whether the reconstructions are durable.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore sought to determine (1) survivorship and complications, (2) function, and (3) radiographic findings of cementless revision TKA in combination with loosely-packed morselized bone graft to reconstruct osseous defects at revision TKA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients who had undergone revision TKAs using cementless long-stemmed components in combination with morselized loose bone graft at our institution. There were 26 men and 30 women with a mean age of 68.3 years (range, 56-89 years). Patients were followed to assess symptoms and function and to detect radiographic loosening, component migration, and graft incorporation. The minimum followup was 4 years (mean, 7.3 years; range, 4-10 years).

RESULTS

Cumulative prosthesis survival, with revision as an end point, was 98% at 10 years. The mean Oxford Knee Scores improved from 21 (36%) preoperatively to 41 (68%) at final followup. Five patients (9%) had reoperations for complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggest this technique is reproducible and obviates the need for excessive bone resection, use of large metal augments, mass allografts, or custom prostheses. It allows for bone stock to be reconstructed reliably with durable midterm component fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

尽管有多种选择可用于重建缺损的骨骼,但在翻修 TKA 中解决骨质流失仍然具有挑战性。使用细碎的松质骨移植物进行生物重建,在增加残余骨量的同时提供生理性负载转移,具有潜在优势。然而,其重建的耐久性尚不清楚。

问题/目的:因此,我们旨在确定:(1)无骨水泥翻修 TKA 联合松散碎骨移植物重建翻修 TKA 中骨缺损的存活率和并发症;(2)功能;(3)影像学发现。

患者和方法

我们回顾性分析了在我院接受无骨水泥长柄组件联合细碎松质骨移植物治疗的 56 例翻修 TKA 患者。26 例男性,30 例女性,平均年龄 68.3 岁(56-89 岁)。患者随访评估症状和功能,检测影像学松动、组件迁移和移植物融合情况。最低随访时间为 4 年(平均 7.3 年;范围,4-10 年)。

结果

以翻修为终点,假体 10 年累积存活率为 98%。牛津膝关节评分从术前的 21 分(36%)提高到最终随访时的 41 分(68%)。5 例(9%)患者因并发症行再次手术。

结论

我们的观察结果表明,该技术可重复使用,避免了过度的骨切除、大金属增强物、大块同种异体移植物或定制假体的使用。它可可靠地重建骨量,具有可靠的中期组件固定。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

1
Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3164-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1938-3. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
2
Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):839-46. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1569-0. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
3
Liner exchange and bone grafting: rare option to treat wear & lysis of stable TKAs.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):154-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1521-3.
4
No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):118-124. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4898-9.
5
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision to TKA: Are Tibial Stems and Augments Associated With Improved Survivorship?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):854-862. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000179.
7
Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2160-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1360-2. Epub 2010 May 4.
9
Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Aug 3;98(15):1286-91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00874.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Jun 20;34(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00158-y.
2
Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results.
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Nov 19;6(11):1073-1086. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210007. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Tibial bone loss in revision TKA: Options for management without sleeves and cones -a schematic review.
J Orthop. 2021 Jan 17;23:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.017. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
5
Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications.
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Jan 28;6(1):23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.11.007. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.
Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2S):98-111. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6520.
8
Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Dec;8(4):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s12178-015-9291-x.
9
Comparative assessment of different reconstructive techniques of distal femur in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Aug;25(8):2559-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3652-2. Epub 2015 May 30.
10
Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty.
Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1279-84. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1929-y. Epub 2013 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May;468(5):1221-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1204-0.
2
The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
3
What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2556-65. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01106.
4
The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Aug;90(8):981-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.19948.
5
Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail?
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6 Suppl 1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.020. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
6
Current state and future of joint replacements in the hip and knee.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008 May;5(3):383-93. doi: 10.1586/17434440.5.3.383.
7
Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2640-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00865.
8
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424.
9
Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1735-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00893.
10
Bone allografts: What they can offer and what they cannot.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 May;89(5):574-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.19039.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验