Suppr超能文献

非骨水泥翻修 TKA 联合骨缺损植骨可在 4 至 10 年内恢复骨质,翻修率较低。

Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

机构信息

Joint Reconstruction Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3164-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1938-3. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Addressing bone loss in revision TKA is challenging despite the array of options to reconstruct the deficient bone. Biologic reconstruction using morselized loosely-packed bone graft potentially allows for augmentation of residual bone stock while offering physiologic load transfer. However it is unclear whether the reconstructions are durable.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore sought to determine (1) survivorship and complications, (2) function, and (3) radiographic findings of cementless revision TKA in combination with loosely-packed morselized bone graft to reconstruct osseous defects at revision TKA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients who had undergone revision TKAs using cementless long-stemmed components in combination with morselized loose bone graft at our institution. There were 26 men and 30 women with a mean age of 68.3 years (range, 56-89 years). Patients were followed to assess symptoms and function and to detect radiographic loosening, component migration, and graft incorporation. The minimum followup was 4 years (mean, 7.3 years; range, 4-10 years).

RESULTS

Cumulative prosthesis survival, with revision as an end point, was 98% at 10 years. The mean Oxford Knee Scores improved from 21 (36%) preoperatively to 41 (68%) at final followup. Five patients (9%) had reoperations for complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggest this technique is reproducible and obviates the need for excessive bone resection, use of large metal augments, mass allografts, or custom prostheses. It allows for bone stock to be reconstructed reliably with durable midterm component fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

尽管有多种选择可用于重建缺损的骨骼,但在翻修 TKA 中解决骨质流失仍然具有挑战性。使用细碎的松质骨移植物进行生物重建,在增加残余骨量的同时提供生理性负载转移,具有潜在优势。然而,其重建的耐久性尚不清楚。

问题/目的:因此,我们旨在确定:(1)无骨水泥翻修 TKA 联合松散碎骨移植物重建翻修 TKA 中骨缺损的存活率和并发症;(2)功能;(3)影像学发现。

患者和方法

我们回顾性分析了在我院接受无骨水泥长柄组件联合细碎松质骨移植物治疗的 56 例翻修 TKA 患者。26 例男性,30 例女性,平均年龄 68.3 岁(56-89 岁)。患者随访评估症状和功能,检测影像学松动、组件迁移和移植物融合情况。最低随访时间为 4 年(平均 7.3 年;范围,4-10 年)。

结果

以翻修为终点,假体 10 年累积存活率为 98%。牛津膝关节评分从术前的 21 分(36%)提高到最终随访时的 41 分(68%)。5 例(9%)患者因并发症行再次手术。

结论

我们的观察结果表明,该技术可重复使用,避免了过度的骨切除、大金属增强物、大块同种异体移植物或定制假体的使用。它可可靠地重建骨量,具有可靠的中期组件固定。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.翻修膝关节置换术中的干骺端骨质流失
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Dec;8(4):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s12178-015-9291-x.
10
Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty.膝关节翻修术中的约束选择。
Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1279-84. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1929-y. Epub 2013 May 23.

本文引用的文献

2
The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.美国翻修全膝关节置换术的流行病学。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
3
What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery.成人膝关节重建手术的新进展。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2556-65. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01106.
4
The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement.翻修全膝关节置换术中骨丢失的处理
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Aug;90(8):981-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.19948.
5
Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail?翻修膝关节置换术为何会失败?
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6 Suppl 1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.020. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
6
8
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验