Barcelos R, Santos M P A, Primo L G, Luiz R R, Maia L C
School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Pólo Universitário de Nova Friburgo (PUNF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Spring;35(3):241-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.3.y777187463255n34.
To perform a systematic review in which the clinical research question for primary teeth with irreversible pulpal pathosis was "how pulpectomies with zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) paste performed compared to other materials in their clinical and radiographic outcomes after twelve months or more follow-up period.
A literature survey of the electronic database (1950-2010) used the Medical Subject Headings and free text terms. Forty three references were retrieved and inclusion criteria were applied; 15 articles remained for full-text evaluation. From these, two were selected for data extraction regarding quality characteristics and results.
Selected studies showed moderate or high risk of bias. The overall success of pulpectomy was 80.0% (Calcicur), 60.0% (Sealapex) and varied from 85.0% to 100.0% (ZOE) and 89.0% to 100.0% (Vitapex). Solely Calcicur presented success rate significantly lower when compared to ZOE and Vitapex. These pastes lead to overfilled canals and particles of extruded ZOE were still evident even after the evaluation period. Resorption of Vitapex, Calcicur and Sealapex within the root canal was also reported.
In primary teeth with irreversible pulpal changes ZOE pulpectomies yielded similar outcome than Vitapex and Sealapex, although there was no agreement with regard to filling materials' resorption.
进行一项系统评价,其中关于患有不可逆牙髓病变的乳牙的临床研究问题是“在随访期十二个月或更长时间后,与其他材料相比,使用氧化锌丁香酚(ZOE)糊剂进行牙髓摘除术的临床和影像学结果如何”。
对电子数据库(1950 - 2010年)进行文献检索,使用医学主题词和自由文本词。检索到43篇参考文献并应用纳入标准;15篇文章留作全文评估。从中选择两篇进行关于质量特征和结果的数据提取。
所选研究显示存在中度或高度偏倚风险。牙髓摘除术的总体成功率分别为80.0%(Calcicur)、60.0%(Sealapex),ZOE的成功率在85.0%至100.0%之间,Vitapex的成功率在89.0%至100.0%之间。与ZOE和Vitapex相比,只有Calcicur的成功率显著较低。这些糊剂导致根管超充,即使在评估期后,挤出的ZOE颗粒仍然明显。也有报道称Vitapex、Calcicur和Sealapex在根管内发生吸收。
在患有不可逆牙髓变化的乳牙中,ZOE牙髓摘除术的结果与Vitapex和Sealapex相似,尽管在填充材料的吸收方面没有达成一致。