Suppr超能文献

1998 年,日本皮肤病学会特应性皮炎严重程度分类标准咨询委员会成员发表的临时报告英文版本。

English version of the interim report published in 1998 by the members of the Advisory Committee on Atopic Dermatitis Severity Classification Criteria of the Japanese Dermatological Association.

机构信息

Advisory Committee on Atopic Dermatitis Severity Classification Criteria of Japanese Dermatological Association.

出版信息

J Dermatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):625-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01285.x.

Abstract

The Japanese Dermatological Association established an advisory committee in 1995 to set up severity scoring systems for atopic dermatitis (AD). Its interim report was published in Japanese in the Japanese Journal of Dermatology (108: 1491-1496, 1998) by Chairman Hikotaro Yoshida. Because of the strong demand for an English version, we have decided to publish the report in English. This prospective study was designed to evaluate the status of 259 AD patients using Method 1, which involves a simple global evaluation of disease severity; Method 2, which involves global evaluation by summing severity scores obtained from five body regions (i.e. the head and neck, anterior and posterior trunks, and upper and lower limbs); Method 3, which consists of both assessment of the extent of involved areas at each of the five body regions and that of the severity scores of each eruption component observed in the most severely affected body region; and Method 4, which consists of the evaluation of only subjective components (daytime pruritus and sleep disturbance). Employing the results obtained with Method 1 as a tentative benchmark, we analyzed its correlation with those of Methods 2, 3 and 4 to statistically assess the validity and reliability of these methods. Method 2, Method 3 and the portion of Method 4 involving evaluation of only the subjective symptom of daytime pruritus but not the sleep disturbance were considered useful in evaluating AD severity.

摘要

日本皮肤病协会于 1995 年成立了一个咨询委员会,以制定特应性皮炎(AD)的严重程度评分系统。其临时报告由主席吉田彦太郎(Hikotaro Yoshida)以日文发表在《日本皮肤病学杂志》(108: 1491-1496,1998 年)上。由于强烈要求提供英文版,我们决定将报告以英文发表。这项前瞻性研究旨在使用方法 1 评估 259 例 AD 患者的状况,方法 1 涉及对疾病严重程度进行简单的整体评估;方法 2 涉及通过汇总来自五个身体区域(即头颈部、前后躯干和上下肢)的严重程度评分来进行整体评估;方法 3 包括评估每个身体区域受累区域的范围以及最严重受累区域中观察到的每个皮损成分的严重程度评分;方法 4 仅评估主观成分(白天瘙痒和睡眠障碍)。我们将方法 1 的结果用作暂定基准,分析其与方法 2、3 和 4 的相关性,以从统计学上评估这些方法的有效性和可靠性。方法 2、方法 3 和仅评估白天瘙痒主观症状而不评估睡眠障碍的方法 4 部分被认为可用于评估 AD 的严重程度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验