• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Promoting decision aid use in primary care using a staff member for delivery.利用员工来推广初级保健中决策辅助工具的使用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.033. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
2
Strategies for distributing cancer screening decision aids in primary care.在初级保健中分发癌症筛查决策辅助工具的策略。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):166-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
3
Who uses decision aids? Subgroup analyses from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of two prostate cancer screening decision support interventions.谁使用决策辅助工具?两项前列腺癌筛查决策支持干预措施的随机对照有效性试验的亚组分析。
Health Expect. 2006 Sep;9(3):285-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00400.x.
4
A comparison of web-based versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.基于网络与基于印刷品的前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的比较:参与者的评估与使用情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2994-7. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
5
Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff.社区实践环境中使用基于网络的交互式决策辅助工具进行结直肠癌筛查的感知障碍与促进因素:来自与基层医疗临床医生和医疗办公室工作人员焦点小组的研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 18;15(12):e286. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2914.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice.一种用于促进初级保健实践中结直肠癌筛查的基于计算机的患者决策辅助工具的开发与初步测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Nov 28;5:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-36.
8
A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care.一项在初级保健中测试肺癌筛查决策辅助工具的前后研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1.
9
Should a colon cancer screening decision aid include the option of no testing? A comparative trial of two decision aids.结肠癌筛查决策辅助工具应包括不进行检测的选项吗?两项决策辅助工具的对比试验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Mar 5;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-10.
10
Patient Education for CKD and Decision Support in Primary Care: Findings From the EPIK Pilot Study.慢性肾脏病的患者教育与初级保健中的决策支持:EPIK试点研究的结果
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Mar;85(3):284-292. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing an implementation intervention, and identifying strategies for integrating health innovations in routine practice: A case study of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid.制定实施干预措施,并确定将健康创新融入常规实践的策略:以实施胰岛素患者决策辅助工具为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0310654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310654. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects by educational attainment of a mammography screening patient decision aid for women aged 75 years and older.受教育程度对 75 岁及以上女性乳房 X 线照片筛查患者决策辅助工具的影响。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4455-4463. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33857. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Evaluation of a mammography decision aid for women 75 and older at risk for lower health literacy in a pretest-posttest trial.评估在一项预试验后试验中针对健康素养较低的 75 岁及以上有风险的女性使用的乳腺 X 线摄影决策辅助工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2344-2350. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study.影响马来西亚公共卫生诊所胰岛素患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244645. eCollection 2020.
5
Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study.在共同决策过程的后半阶段引出偏好需要关注:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z.
6
Primary Care-Based Staff Ideas for Implementing a Mammography Decision Aid for Women 75+: a Qualitative Study.基于初级保健的员工对实施适合 75 岁以上女性的乳房 X 光摄影决策辅助工具的想法:一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2414-2420. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05239-5. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
7
The Feasibility and Usability of a Ranking Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Trigger Finger.一种用于引出患者对扳机指治疗偏好的排序工具的可行性和可用性
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jun;44(6):480-486.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Exploring the preferences of involved health professionals regarding the implementation of an online decision aid to support couples during reproductive decision-making in hereditary cancer: a mixed methods approach.探索相关卫生专业人员对实施在线决策辅助工具以支持遗传性癌症生殖决策过程中夫妇的偏好:混合方法研究。
Fam Cancer. 2019 Apr;18(2):285-291. doi: 10.1007/s10689-019-00119-7.
9
Developing and Evaluating a Clinic-Based Decision Aid Delivery System.开发和评估基于诊所的决策辅助工具交付系统。
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul 7;1(1):2381468316656850. doi: 10.1177/2381468316656850. eCollection 2016 Jul-Dec.
10
Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - a scoping review.影响共享决策实施的组织和系统层面的特征及应对策略:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 9;13(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0731-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for distributing cancer screening decision aids in primary care.在初级保健中分发癌症筛查决策辅助工具的策略。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):166-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
3
Effectiveness of decision aids: a review of the evidence.
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Dec;65(6 Suppl):79S-116S. doi: 10.1177/1077558708324234.
4
Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients.在社区基层医疗中使用决策辅助工具:一项针对不同种族患者的理论驱动评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):490-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.040. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
5
The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial.邮寄式多模式结直肠癌筛查干预措施的效果和影响:一项试点对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2008 Jun 2;3:32. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-32.
6
Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation.弥合预防研究与实践之间的差距:传播与实施的互动系统框架。
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z.
7
Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review.前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的试验:一项系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Nov;33(5):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.030.
8
Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making.促进明智选择:转变医疗保健模式以提供决策所需知识。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 16;143(4):293-300. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-4-200508160-00010.
9
Patient education for colon cancer screening: a randomized trial of a video mailed before a physical examination.结肠癌筛查的患者教育:一项在体格检查前邮寄视频的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 2;141(9):683-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-9-200411020-00009.
10
Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减重手术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.

利用员工来推广初级保健中决策辅助工具的使用。

Promoting decision aid use in primary care using a staff member for delivery.

机构信息

Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.033. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.033
PMID:21680131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3268845/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of in-clinic decision aid distribution using a care assistant.

METHODS

We identified potentially eligible patients scheduled for upcoming appointments in our General Internal Medicine Clinic (n=1229). Patients were deemed eligible for two decision aids: prostate cancer screening and/or weight loss surgery. Patients were approached to view the decision aid in-clinic. Our primary measures were the proportion of decision aids distributed to eligible patients, and the proportion of decision aids viewed.

RESULTS

Among 913 patients who attended their scheduled appointments, 58% (n=525) were approached and eligibility was assessed by the staff member. Among the 471 who remained eligible, 57% (n=268) viewed at least a portion of the target decision aid. The mean viewing time for patients who watched less than the complete decision aid was 13 min.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinic viewing of decision aids may be a feasible and effective distribution method in primary care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

In clinic distribution requires an electronic health information system to identify potentially eligible patients, and a staff member dedicated to DA distribution. Brief decision aids (less than 10 min) are needed so patients can complete their use prior to the visit to facilitate patient-physician decision making.

摘要

目的

确定使用护理助理在诊室内分发决策辅助工具的可行性和效果。

方法

我们确定了即将在我们的普通内科诊所就诊的 1229 名潜在合格患者。这些患者被认为适合两种决策辅助工具:前列腺癌筛查和/或减肥手术。在诊室内向患者介绍了决策辅助工具。我们的主要衡量标准是向合格患者分发的决策辅助工具的比例,以及查看决策辅助工具的比例。

结果

在 913 名按计划就诊的患者中,58%(n=525)由工作人员接触并评估了他们的资格。在仍然符合条件的 471 名患者中,57%(n=268)至少观看了目标决策辅助工具的一部分。观看不完整决策辅助工具的患者的平均观看时间为 13 分钟。

结论

在初级保健中,在诊室内观看决策辅助工具可能是一种可行且有效的分发方法。

实践意义

在诊室内分发需要一个电子健康信息系统来识别潜在合格的患者,以及一名专门负责分发决策辅助工具的工作人员。需要简短的决策辅助工具(不到 10 分钟),以便患者在就诊前完成使用,以促进医患决策。