Shore Nancy, Drew Elaine, Brazauskas Ruta, Seifer Sarena D
University of New England School of Social Work, Portland, ME 04103, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):13-21. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.13.
Community groups are implementing research ethics review processes to determine whether and how research is conducted in their communities. We report on a survey of 109 of these community-based review processes about their relationships with institution based research ethics boards (I-REBs). Ninety-two percent reported that studies they review were also reviewed by an I-REB. Over half characterized their relationship with I-REBs positively. Those with positive relationships were significantly more likely to communicate with the involved I-REBs. Challenges when working with I-REBs included delays, communication problems, and lack of I-REB understanding of community-based participatory research. Strengthening relationships between community-based review processes and I-REBs could ultimately enhance reviews of community-engaged research.
社区团体正在实施研究伦理审查程序,以确定研究是否以及如何在其社区中开展。我们报告了一项针对109个此类基于社区的审查程序的调查,内容涉及它们与基于机构的研究伦理委员会(I-REBs)的关系。92%的受访者表示,他们审查的研究也经过了I-REB的审查。超过半数对它们与I-REBs的关系给予了积极评价。关系积极的审查程序与相关I-REBs进行沟通的可能性显著更高。与I-REBs合作时面临的挑战包括延误、沟通问题以及I-REBs对基于社区的参与性研究缺乏了解。加强基于社区的审查程序与I-REBs之间的关系最终可能会提升对社区参与研究的审查。