Suppr超能文献

基于社区的研究伦理审查流程与基于机构的机构审查委员会之间的关系:一项全国性研究。

Relationships between community-based processes for research ethics review and institution-based IRBs: a national study.

作者信息

Shore Nancy, Drew Elaine, Brazauskas Ruta, Seifer Sarena D

机构信息

University of New England School of Social Work, Portland, ME 04103, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):13-21. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.13.

Abstract

Community groups are implementing research ethics review processes to determine whether and how research is conducted in their communities. We report on a survey of 109 of these community-based review processes about their relationships with institution based research ethics boards (I-REBs). Ninety-two percent reported that studies they review were also reviewed by an I-REB. Over half characterized their relationship with I-REBs positively. Those with positive relationships were significantly more likely to communicate with the involved I-REBs. Challenges when working with I-REBs included delays, communication problems, and lack of I-REB understanding of community-based participatory research. Strengthening relationships between community-based review processes and I-REBs could ultimately enhance reviews of community-engaged research.

摘要

社区团体正在实施研究伦理审查程序,以确定研究是否以及如何在其社区中开展。我们报告了一项针对109个此类基于社区的审查程序的调查,内容涉及它们与基于机构的研究伦理委员会(I-REBs)的关系。92%的受访者表示,他们审查的研究也经过了I-REB的审查。超过半数对它们与I-REBs的关系给予了积极评价。关系积极的审查程序与相关I-REBs进行沟通的可能性显著更高。与I-REBs合作时面临的挑战包括延误、沟通问题以及I-REBs对基于社区的参与性研究缺乏了解。加强基于社区的审查程序与I-REBs之间的关系最终可能会提升对社区参与研究的审查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验