• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛全层切除术增加直肠癌根治术的发病率。

Previous transanal full-thickness excision increases the morbidity of radical resection for rectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, France.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):445-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02671.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02671.x
PMID:21689342
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of primary full-thickness transanal excision (TAE) on the morbidity rate following radical rectal resection for cancer.

METHOD

Fourteen consecutive patients underwent radical resection for lower third rectal cancer following full-thickness TAE without closure of the defect. They were compared with 25 matched patients from a prospective database of 275 rectal resections who had undergone radical resection without previous TAE for lower third rectal cancer (control group). The confounding factors were: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), classification according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists, administration of neoadjuvant radiotherapy before rectal resection, tumour stage and type of surgical procedure.

RESULTS

There were no deaths. Overall morbidity was 64.3% in the TAE group and 32% in the control group (P = 0.112). Surgical complications were significantly more frequent in the former (57.1%vs 20%; P = 0.048). The frequency of specific surgical site complications, including anastomotic complications and pelvic abscess formation requiring surgical drainage, was significantly higher in the TAE group than in the control group (42.8%vs 8%; P = 0.032). In univariate analysis, the only factors associated with specific surgical site complications were BMI > 27 and TAE before rectal resection.

CONCLUSION

This case-matched study suggests that previous full-thickness TAE increases the risk of surgical complications after radical resection for lower third rectal cancer, including anastomotic dehiscence and pelvic sepsis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定原发性全层经肛门切除术(TAE)对直肠癌根治性切除术后发病率的影响。

方法

14 例连续接受全层 TAE 后行低位直肠癌根治性切除术的患者,未闭合缺损。将他们与 25 例因低位直肠癌而未接受全层 TAE 的前瞻性数据库中的 275 例直肠切除术患者(对照组)进行比较。混杂因素为:年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、美国麻醉医师协会分类、直肠切除术前新辅助放疗、肿瘤分期和手术类型。

结果

无死亡病例。TAE 组总并发症发生率为 64.3%,对照组为 32%(P=0.112)。TAE 组手术并发症明显更常见(57.1%比 20%;P=0.048)。TAE 组吻合口并发症和需要手术引流的盆腔脓肿形成等特定手术部位并发症的发生率明显高于对照组(42.8%比 8%;P=0.032)。单因素分析显示,与特定手术部位并发症相关的唯一因素是 BMI>27 和直肠切除术前 TAE。

结论

这项病例匹配研究表明,全层 TAE 会增加低位直肠癌根治性切除术后手术并发症的风险,包括吻合口裂开和盆腔感染。

相似文献

1
Previous transanal full-thickness excision increases the morbidity of radical resection for rectal cancer.经肛全层切除术增加直肠癌根治术的发病率。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):445-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02671.x.
2
Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?与保肛直肠切除术相比,腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结局相关因素:仅与患者和肿瘤相关或与技术相关因素?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182351c1f.
3
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer.经肛门内镜显微手术与传统经肛门切除术治疗早期直肠癌患者的比较
Ann Surg. 2009 May;249(5):776-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a3e54b.
4
[Factors associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection in rectal cancer].[直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏的相关因素]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Apr 15;47(8):594-8.
5
Factors affecting anastomotic complications following anterior resection in rectal cancer.影响直肠癌前切除术后吻合口并发症的因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):801-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01197.x.
6
Oncological outcome of local vs radical resection of low-risk pT1 rectal cancer.低风险pT1期直肠癌局部切除与根治性切除的肿瘤学结局
Arch Surg. 2007 Jul;142(7):649-55; discussion 656. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.7.649.
7
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer.术前放化疗及全直肠系膜切除低位前切除术后局部进展期直肠癌吻合口漏的危险因素。
Rev Invest Clin. 2006 May-Jun;58(3):204-10.
8
Neoadjuvant treatment does not influence perioperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery.新辅助治疗不影响直肠癌手术的围手术期结局。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.051. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
9
Sacral resection for recurrent rectal cancer: analysis of morbidity and treatment results.复发性直肠癌的骶骨切除术:发病率及治疗结果分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1099-107. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0563-9.
10
Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise?直肠癌局部切除术后立即行根治性切除:一种肿瘤学上的妥协?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):429-37. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0900-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Stoma Rate and Oncological Outcomes of Primary TaTME vs Completion TaTME in Patients With Early-Stage Rectal Cancer.早期直肠癌患者中,原发性经肛全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与完成性TaTME的造口率及肿瘤学结局
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Aug 1;68(8):962-971. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003794. Epub 2025 May 5.
2
Oncologic safety and technical feasibility of completion transanal total mesorectal excision after local excision; a cohort study from the International TaTME Registry.局部切除术后经肛门根治性全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学安全性和技术可行性:一项来自国际经肛门全直肠系膜切除术登记处的队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):970-977. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11390-w. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
Short-term outcomes after primary total mesorectal excision (TME) versus local excision followed by completion TME for early rectal cancer: population-based propensity-matched study.
直肠癌患者行直肠系膜全切除(TME)与局部切除后补救性 TME 的短期疗效比较:基于人群的倾向性匹配研究
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae103.
4
Completion Total Mesorectal Excision: A Case-Matched Comparison With Primary Resection.完成全直肠系膜切除术:与初次切除术的病例匹配比较。
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Aug 23;4(3):e327. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000327. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Body mass index-based predictions and personalized clinical strategies for colorectal cancer in the context of PPPM.基于体重指数在精准预防医学背景下对结直肠癌的预测及个性化临床策略
EPMA J. 2022 Dec 2;13(4):615-632. doi: 10.1007/s13167-022-00306-0. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Cost comparisons of endoscopic and surgical resection of stage T1 rectal cancer.T1期直肠癌内镜切除与手术切除的成本比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1512-E1519. doi: 10.1055/a-1522-8762. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
The impact of transanal local excision of early rectal cancer on completion rectal resection without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review.经肛门局部切除早期直肠癌对无新辅助放化疗的全直肠系膜切除术的影响:一项系统综述。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Sep;25(9):997-1010. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02401-8. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
8
Completion total mesorectal excision following transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not compromise outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.经肛门内镜微创手术(TEM)后完成全直肠系膜切除术不会影响直肠癌患者的预后。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1181-1190. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08385-2. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
Outcomes of completion total mesorectal excision are not compromised by prior transanal minimally invasive surgery.经肛门微创手术并不会影响全直肠系膜切除术的根治效果。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;22(7):790-798. doi: 10.1111/codi.14962. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Local excision followed by early radical surgery in rectal cancer: long-term outcome.局部切除加早期根治性手术治疗直肠癌:长期疗效。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct 8;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1705-6.