Institute of Cognitive Science, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Cognition. 2011 Oct;121(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.009.
The process of word form encoding was investigated in primed word naming and word typing with Chinese monosyllabic words. The target words shared or did not share the onset consonants with the prime words. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was 100ms or 300ms. Typing required the participants to enter the phonetic letters of the target word, which correspond roughly to the onset and the rhyme of the word's syllable. Regardless of SOAs, response times were shorter in the related condition than in the unrelated condition (an onset priming effect) for word typing, but were similar for word naming. The results suggest that naming and typing in Chinese may involve somewhat different word form encoding processes (syllable driven in naming, but segment driven in typing) even though both tasks require accessing the phonological codes. It appears, then, that the kind of outputs a production system is designed to produce can flexibly and adaptively alter the way the system is organized and operates.
本研究采用汉语单音节词启动字命名和词打字任务,考察了词形编码过程。目标词与启动词共享或不共享首音。刺激起始间隔(SOA)为 100ms 或 300ms。打字任务要求参与者输入目标词的拼音字母,大致对应于词的音节的声母和韵母。无论 SOA 如何,在词打字任务中,相关条件下的反应时都短于不相关条件下的反应时(首音启动效应),而在词命名任务中则相似。结果表明,即使两种任务都需要访问语音代码,汉语的命名和打字可能涉及不同的词形编码过程(命名时以音节为导向,打字时以音段为导向)。因此,似乎一个产生系统被设计用来产生的输出类型可以灵活地和适应性地改变系统的组织和运作方式。