Amantini Aldo, Carrai Riccardo, Fossi Selvaggia, Pinto Francesco, Grippo Antonello
Department of Neurosciences, Clinical Neurophysiology, Careggi University Hospital, Flourence, Italy.
Funct Neurol. 2011 Jan-Mar;26(1):7-14.
We all share the need to optimise the evaluation of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC), given the high rate of misdiagnosis of vegetative state based on clinical examination. We believe that one way to do this is to optimise assessment from the early stages, in order to reduce discontinuity between the hospital and rehabilitation phases. While clinical observation remains the "gold standard" for the diagnostic assessment of patients with DOC, neurophysiological investigations (electroencephalography, short latency evoked potentials and event-related potentials) could help to further understanding of the pathophysiology underlying the state of unresponsiveness, differentiate coma from other apparently similar conditions (i.e., locked-in and locked-in-like syndromes), and potentially integrate prognostic evaluation with monitoring of the evolution of the clinical state. Moreover, these techniques have the considerable advantage of being available at the bedside. Discontinuity between the hospital and rehabilitation phases is rightly considered to be one of the critical points in the assessment of patients with DOC. In our view, a continuum of expert neurological assessment that begins with monitoring of the acute phase (focusing on evolution of primary brain damage and secondary complications) and follows through to the patient's discharge from the intensive care unit (focusing on the pathophysiology of brain damage and prognostication based on clinical, neuroimaging and neurophysiological tests) could help to: i) optimise the rehabilitation programme according to the expectations of recovery; ii) provide a basis for comparison with subsequent periodic re-evaluations; iii) ensure uniformity of assessment regardless of the heterogeneity of care facilities; and iv) characterise a subset of patients who, showing discrepancies between neurophysiological tests and clinical status, are more likely to undergo unexpected recovery.
鉴于基于临床检查对植物状态的误诊率很高,我们都有共同的需求来优化对意识障碍(DOC)患者的评估。我们认为,实现这一目标的一种方法是从早期阶段优化评估,以减少医院阶段和康复阶段之间的脱节。虽然临床观察仍然是DOC患者诊断评估的“金标准”,但神经生理学检查(脑电图、短潜伏期诱发电位和事件相关电位)有助于进一步了解无反应状态背后的病理生理学,区分昏迷与其他明显相似的情况(即闭锁综合征和类闭锁综合征),并有可能将预后评估与临床状态演变的监测相结合。此外,这些技术具有可在床边进行的显著优势。医院阶段和康复阶段之间的脱节被正确地认为是DOC患者评估中的关键点之一。我们认为,从急性期监测(关注原发性脑损伤和继发性并发症的演变)开始,一直到患者从重症监护病房出院(关注脑损伤的病理生理学以及基于临床、神经影像学和神经生理学检查的预后判断)的连续的专家神经学评估,有助于:i)根据恢复预期优化康复计划;ii)为与后续定期重新评估进行比较提供基础;iii)确保评估的一致性,无论护理设施的异质性如何;iv)确定一部分神经生理学检查与临床状态存在差异、更有可能出现意外恢复的患者。