Formisano Rita, D'Ippolito Mariagrazia, Risetti Monica, Riccio Angela, Caravasso Chiara Falletta, Catani Sheila, Rizza Federica, Forcina Antonio, Buzzi Maria Gabriella
Post-Coma Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Funct Neurol. 2011 Jan-Mar;26(1):15-24.
The aim of this study was to review the usefulness of clinical and instrumental evaluation in individuals with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Thirteen subjects with severe acquired brain injury (ABI) and a diagnosis of DOC were evaluated using the Coma Recovery Scale in its revised version (CRS-R) and a new global disability index, the Post-Coma Scale (PCS). These instruments were administered both by a neutral examiner (professional) and by a professional in the presence of a caregiver. All patients were also scored using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). A statistically significant correlation between CRS-R and PCS was demonstrated. However, there also emerged significant differences in responsiveness between professional versus caregiver+professional assessment using the two scales. The emotional stimulation provided by significant others (caregivers) during administration of DOC evaluation scales may improve the assessment of responsiveness.
本研究的目的是评估临床和仪器评估对意识障碍(DOC)患者的实用性。使用修订版昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)和一种新的整体残疾指数——昏迷后量表(PCS),对13名患有严重获得性脑损伤(ABI)且诊断为DOC的受试者进行了评估。这些评估工具由一名中立的检查者(专业人员)以及一名在照料者在场情况下的专业人员进行施测。所有患者还使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)进行了评分。结果显示CRS-R和PCS之间存在统计学上的显著相关性。然而,在使用这两种量表进行评估时,专业人员与照料者+专业人员的评估在反应性方面也出现了显著差异。在DOC评估量表施测过程中,重要他人(照料者)提供的情感刺激可能会改善对反应性的评估。