Structure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
Nature. 2011 Jun 22;474(7352):494-7. doi: 10.1038/nature10164.
Flying birds often form flocks, with social, navigational and anti-predator implications. Further, flying in a flock can result in aerodynamic benefits, thus reducing power requirements, as demonstrated by a reduction in heart rate and wingbeat frequency in pelicans flying in a V-formation. But how general is an aerodynamic power reduction due to group-flight? V-formation flocks are limited to moderately steady flight in relatively large birds, and may represent a special case. What are the aerodynamic consequences of flying in the more usual 'cluster' flock? Here we use data from innovative back-mounted Global Positioning System (GPS) and 6-degrees-of-freedom inertial sensors to show that pigeons (1) maintain powered, banked turns like aircraft, imposing dorsal accelerations of up to 2g, effectively doubling body weight and quadrupling induced power requirements; (2) increase flap frequency with increases in all conventional aerodynamic power requirements; and (3) increase flap frequency when flying near, particularly behind, other birds. Therefore, unlike V-formation pelicans, pigeons do not gain an aerodynamic advantage from flying in a flock. Indeed, the increased flap frequency, whether due to direct aerodynamic interactions or requirements for increased stability or control, suggests a considerable energetic cost to flight in a tight cluster flock.
飞鸟通常会成群结队地飞行,这对它们的社交、导航和防御捕食者都有重要意义。此外,成群飞行可以带来空气动力学的好处,从而减少能量需求,就像鹈鹕以 V 字形编队飞行时,心率和翅膀拍打频率降低所证明的那样。但是,由于群体飞行而导致的空气动力学效率降低在多大程度上具有普遍性呢?V 字形编队仅限于相对较大的鸟类进行适度稳定的飞行,可能代表一种特殊情况。那么,在更常见的“集群”中飞行会带来什么样的空气动力学后果呢?在这里,我们使用创新的背载全球定位系统 (GPS) 和 6 自由度惯性传感器的数据表明,鸽子 (1) 保持着类似于飞机的有动力、倾斜转弯,产生的背部加速度高达 2g,有效地将体重增加一倍,并使诱导的功率需求增加四倍;(2) 随着所有常规空气动力学功率需求的增加,增加翅膀拍打频率;(3) 当靠近其他鸟类,特别是在其后面飞行时,增加翅膀拍打频率。因此,与 V 字形编队的鹈鹕不同,鸽子不会从成群飞行中获得空气动力学优势。事实上,无论是由于直接的空气动力学相互作用还是对增加稳定性或控制的要求,翅膀拍打频率的增加都表明在密集的集群中飞行会带来相当大的能量消耗。