Suppr超能文献

抗感染浸渍建议用于科洛普夫 Titan 可膨胀阴茎假体在感染延迟涂层植入物的时代。

Anti-infection dip suggestions for the Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in the era of the infection retardant coated implant.

机构信息

Urology, Institutes of Urologic Excellence, Indio, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2011 Sep;8(9):2647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02363.x. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Infection is the worst complication seen with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Both the American Medical Systems (AMS) and Coloplast IPP have infection retardant coatings. AMS is coated at the factory with rifampicin and minocycline (InhibiZone). The Coloplast IPP has a hydrophilic coating covalently bonded to its components that will absorb any aqueous solution before implantation and provides increased surface lubricity to decrease bacterial adherence.

AIM

We tested several antibiotic dips comparing zones of inhibition (ZOI) against five commonly infecting bacteria with coated Coloplast implants. Results were compared with those ZOI created with strips of an AMS IPP precoated with InhibiZone.

METHODS

Pieces of sterile Coloplast Titan IPP were dipped in (i) trimethoprim/polymixin B ophthalmic solution; (ii) trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole infusion solution; (iii) bacitracin; (iv) rifampicin/minocycline; and (v) rifampin/trimehtoprim/sulfamethoxazole. ZOI for the Titan strips and for AMS InhibiZone coated strips were tested against Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas, and Enterococcus.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

ZOIs of the Coloplast Titan for each of the medicated solutions were compared with ZOI created by undipped strips of a sterile InhibiZone coated IPP placed on plates of the identical bacteria.

RESULTS

All dips except bacitracin showed ZOI≥InhibiZone (P≥0.005) for most organisms. Because of broad-spectrum effectiveness, ease of handling, and cost, infusion vial of trimehtoprim/sulfamethoxazole seemed optimal at this time. If trimehtoprim/sulfamethoxazole is unavailable; the ZOI with Polytrim ophthalmic solution zones were almost as good.

CONCLUSIONS

The Coloplast strips when dipped in several solutions showed equal or significantly larger ZOI against commonly infecting organisms than the InhibiZone coated strips. At the present time using off the shelf trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole infusion solution seems optimum. The flexibility of choosing the drug eluting from the Coloplast device seems promising in the changing bacterial environment.

摘要

简介

感染是可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)最严重的并发症。美国医学系统(AMS)和科洛波斯特 IPP 都有抗感染涂层。AMS 在工厂用利福平(rifampicin)和米诺环素(minocycline)(InhibiZone)涂层。科洛波斯特 IPP 有亲水涂层,共价键合到其组件上,在植入前会吸收任何水溶液,并提供增加的表面润滑性,以减少细菌黏附。

目的

我们测试了几种抗生素浸泡液,比较了带有涂层的科洛波斯特植入物对五种常见感染细菌的抑制区(ZOI)。结果与预先用 InhibiZone 涂层的 AMS IPP 条带的 ZOI 进行了比较。

方法

无菌科洛波斯特 Titan IPP 片分别浸泡在(i)三甲氧苄氨嘧啶/多粘菌素 B 眼用溶液;(ii)三甲氧苄氨嘧啶/磺胺甲恶唑输注溶液;(iii)杆菌肽;(iv)利福平/米诺环素;和(v)利福平/三甲氧苄氨嘧啶/磺胺甲恶唑。对 Titan 条带和 AMS InhibiZone 涂层条带的 ZOI 进行了测试,以对抗表皮葡萄球菌、路邓葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肠球菌。

主要观察指标

比较浸泡在各种溶液中的科洛波斯特 Titan 的 ZOI 与无菌 InhibiZone 涂层 IPP 条带放置在相同细菌平板上形成的未浸泡条带的 ZOI。

结果

除杆菌肽外,所有浸泡液对大多数病原体的 ZOI≥InhibiZone(P≥0.005)。由于广谱有效性、易于处理和成本,目前三甲氧苄氨嘧啶/磺胺甲恶唑输注小瓶似乎是最佳选择。如果无法获得三甲氧苄氨嘧啶/磺胺甲恶唑;聚三甲眼用溶液的 ZOI 几乎同样好。

结论

浸泡在几种溶液中的科洛波斯特条带对常见感染病原体的 ZOI 与 InhibiZone 涂层条带相等或显著更大。目前,使用现成的三甲氧苄氨嘧啶/磺胺甲恶唑输注溶液似乎是最佳选择。从科洛波斯特装置中选择释放药物的灵活性似乎在不断变化的细菌环境中很有前景。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验