• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗菌浸泡溶液对初次植入科洛普坦钛可充气 penile 假体的糖尿病患者术后感染率的影响。

Impact of Antimicrobial Dipping Solutions on Postoperative Infection Rates in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Primary Insertion of a Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2020 Oct;17(10):2077-2083. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.009
PMID:32807707
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modern-day penile prostheses use infection retardant coating to decrease rates of postoperative infection, subsequently reducing explantation and revision rates as well. The Coloplast Titan models are dipped into antimicrobial solutions right before implantation, and the components used for dipping can be tailored toward the patient.

AIM

To compare infection, explantation, and revision rates among different dipping solutions used before implantation for patients with diabetes receiving a Coloplast Titan implant.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed 932 patients with diabetes receiving a primary penile implant across 18 different centers from the period April 2003 to August 2018. Of those patients, 473 received a Coloplast device, whereas 459 received an AMS device. Data regarding the type of antimicrobial solution used before implantation were recorded for 468 patients receiving a Coloplast Titan, including whether or not they suffered a postoperative infection and if they underwent explantation and/or revision. Outcome rates were compared using Fisher's exact and Pearson's chi-square tests, and logistic regression modeling was performed to account for covariates.

OUTCOMES

The main outcome measures of this study were postoperative infection, explantation, and revision rates.

RESULTS

Of the total 932 patients reviewed, 33 suffered a postoperative infection. Of 468 patients receiving Coloplast implants, there was a 3.4% infection rate. The most commonly used antibiotic combination before dipping was vancomycin + gentamicin (59.0%). There was a significantly lower rate of postoperative infection, explantation, and revision when vancomycin + gentamicin was used than those associated with the use of all other dipping solutions ([1.4% vs 6.4%; P = .004], [1.1% vs 8.3%; P < .001], and [2.5% vs 12.5; P < .001], respectively). After adjusting for age, body mass index, preoperative blood glucose level, and hemoglobin A1c, the use of other dips was an independent predictor of postoperative infection (odds ratio: 0.191; P = .049). The inclusion of rifampin in the dipping solution trended toward being a significant risk factor for infection (P = .057). Including antifungals in the dipping solution did not affect infection (P = .414), explantation (P = .421), or revision (P = .328) rates.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Vancomycin + gentamicin was the most efficacious combination of antibiotics used for dipping in terms of preventing postoperative infection and subsequent explantation and revision.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Data were sampled across multiple institutions providing a large sample that may be more representative of the population of interest. A key limitation of the study was its retrospective nature, which prevented us from controlling certain variables.

CONCLUSION

The use of rifampin did not provide the same type of protection, possibly representing a shift in resistance patterns of common bacteria responsible for device infection. Towe M, Huynh LM, Osman MM, et al. Impact of Antimicrobial Dipping Solutions on Postoperative Infection Rates in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Primary Insertion of a Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis. J Sex Med 2020;17:2077-2083.

摘要

背景

现代阴茎假体使用抗感染涂层来降低术后感染率,从而降低假体取出和翻修率。科洛普夫坦阴茎假体模型在植入前浸入抗菌溶液中,并且用于浸渍的组件可以根据患者的情况进行定制。

目的

比较不同浸渍溶液在植入前用于接受科洛普夫坦阴茎假体植入的糖尿病患者中的感染、假体取出和翻修率。

方法

我们系统地回顾了 2003 年 4 月至 2018 年 8 月期间 18 个不同中心的 932 名接受原发性阴茎植入术的糖尿病患者。在这些患者中,473 名患者接受了科洛普夫坦植入物,而 459 名患者接受了 AMS 植入物。记录了 468 名接受科洛普夫坦 Titan 植入物的患者在植入前使用的抗菌溶液类型的数据,包括是否发生术后感染以及是否进行了假体取出和/或翻修。使用 Fisher 精确检验和 Pearson χ2 检验比较结果率,并进行逻辑回归建模以考虑协变量。

结果

在回顾的 932 名患者中,33 名患者发生术后感染。在 468 名接受科洛普夫坦植入物的患者中,感染率为 3.4%。最常用的抗生素组合是万古霉素+庆大霉素(59.0%)。在使用万古霉素+庆大霉素时,术后感染、假体取出和翻修的发生率明显低于使用其他所有浸渍溶液时的发生率([1.4%比 6.4%;P=0.004],[1.1%比 8.3%;P<0.001],[2.5%比 12.5%;P<0.001])。在调整年龄、体重指数、术前血糖水平和血红蛋白 A1c 后,使用其他浸渍液是术后感染的独立预测因素(优势比:0.191;P=0.049)。在浸渍液中加入利福平有感染的趋势(P=0.057)。在浸渍液中加入抗真菌药物并不会影响感染(P=0.414)、假体取出(P=0.421)或翻修(P=0.328)率。

临床意义

万古霉素+庆大霉素是预防术后感染和随后的假体取出和翻修最有效的抗生素组合。

局限性

数据是从多个机构采集的,提供了一个可能更能代表目标人群的大样本。该研究的一个关键局限性是其回顾性,这使我们无法控制某些变量。

结论

利福平的使用并没有提供相同类型的保护,这可能代表了导致设备感染的常见细菌的耐药模式发生了转变。

相似文献

1
Impact of Antimicrobial Dipping Solutions on Postoperative Infection Rates in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Primary Insertion of a Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.抗菌浸泡溶液对初次植入科洛普坦钛可充气 penile 假体的糖尿病患者术后感染率的影响。
J Sex Med. 2020 Oct;17(10):2077-2083. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
2
Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparison with Inhibizone-impregnated AMS penile implants.利福平/庆大霉素涂层 Titan Coloplast 阴茎植入物的感染率。与 Inhibizone 浸渍的 AMS 阴茎植入物的比较。
J Sex Med. 2011 Jan;8(1):315-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02068.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
3
In vitro assessment of antimicrobial properties of rifampin-coated Titan(®) Coloplast penile implants and comparison with Inhibizone(®).体外评估利福平涂层 Titan(®)科洛特阴茎植入物的抗菌性能,并与 Inhibizone(®)进行比较。
J Sex Med. 2010 Oct;7(10):3516-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01874.x.
4
Anti-infection dip suggestions for the Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in the era of the infection retardant coated implant.抗感染浸渍建议用于科洛普夫 Titan 可膨胀阴茎假体在感染延迟涂层植入物的时代。
J Sex Med. 2011 Sep;8(9):2647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02363.x. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
5
Timing and causative organisms associated with modern inflatable penile prosthesis infection: an institutional retrospective.与现代可膨胀阴茎假体感染相关的时间及致病微生物:一项机构回顾性研究
J Sex Med. 2023 Jan 14;20(1):107-112. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac001.
6
Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.AMS 700™ CX 与科洛普夫™ Titan 可膨胀阴茎假体治疗 Peyronie 病和重塑的比较:临床结果和患者满意度。
J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2855-60. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12009. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
7
The Effect of Bupivacaine on the Efficacy of Antibiotic Coating on Penile Implants in Preventing Infection.布比卡因对阴茎假体抗生素涂层预防感染疗效的影响。
Sex Med. 2019 Sep;7(3):337-344. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
Do Antifungals and Local Anesthetic Affect the Efficacy of Antibiotic Dipping Solution?抗真菌药和局部麻醉药会影响抗生素浸泡溶液的疗效吗?
J Sex Med. 2021 May;18(5):966-973. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
9
Evaluation of Bacteria in a Novel In Vitro Biofilm Model of Penile Prosthesis.阴茎假体新型体外生物膜模型中的细菌评估
J Sex Med. 2022 Jun;19(6):1024-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.03.602. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
10
Long-term revision rate due to infection in hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prostheses: 11-year follow-up.亲水涂层可膨胀阴茎假体感染导致的长期返修率:11 年随访结果。
J Sex Med. 2012 Aug;9(8):2182-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02830.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic inflatable penile prosthesis (DIPP) with the enhanced Rigicon Infla10 penile implant: a narrative review.带有增强型Rigicon Infla10阴茎植入物的动态充气式阴茎假体(DIPP):一项叙述性综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01059-w.
2
Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review.可膨胀阴茎假体手术围手术期感染的预防:一项叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1628-1640. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-497. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Unveiling the Hidden Perils: A Comprehensive Review of Fungal Infections in Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery.
揭示潜在风险:充气式阴茎假体手术中真菌感染的全面综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 16;14(6):644. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060644.
4
Addressing the need for preclinical study of penile prosthesis infection: a new animal model and narrative review.满足阴茎假体感染临床前研究的需求:一种新的动物模型及叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):342-352. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-353. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
Maximizing outcomes in penile prosthetic surgery: exploring strategies to prevent and manage infectious and non-infectious complications.最大限度地提高阴茎假体手术的效果:探索预防和管理感染和非感染性并发症的策略。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):613-619. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00773-7. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
6
50th year anniversary of penile implants: an ongoing worldwide triumph.阴茎植入物50周年:全球范围内的持续成功。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):589-590. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00690-9. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
7
Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature.阴茎植入物感染因素:当代文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Oct;10(10):3873-3884. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-568.
8
Tips and tricks in the management of inflatable penile prosthesis infection: A review.可膨胀阴茎假体感染管理中的技巧与窍门:综述
Arab J Urol. 2021 Jul 5;19(3):346-352. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1946335. eCollection 2021.