Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(2):365-75. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-101977.
Plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) levels have been proposed as biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but studies have produced inconsistent results. We present a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies that examined plasma Aβ levels in AD and cognitively normal subjects, and longitudinal studies that used baseline plasma Aβ levels to predict conversion from normal cognition to AD. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched to generate an initial list of relevant studies, and selected authors approached for additional data. Twelve cross- sectional studies (n = 1483) and seven longitudinal (n = 3920) met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Random effects model was used to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD) by Review Manager Version 4.2. In longitudinal studies, cognitively normal individuals who converted to AD had higher baseline Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 levels (WMD: 10.29, z = 3.80, p = 0.0001 and WMD: 8.01, z = 2.76, p = 0.006, respectively), and non-significantly increased Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio (WMD: 0.03, z = 1.65, p = 0.10). In cross sectional studies, compared to cognitively normal individuals, AD patients had marginally but non-significantly lower Aβ1-42 levels (WMD:-2.84, z = 1.73, p = 0.08), but Aβ1-40 levels were not significantly different (WMD: 3.43, z = 0.40, p = 0.69). Our systematic review suggests a model of differential longitudinal changes in plasma Aβ levels in cognitively stable individuals versus those who go on to develop AD dementia. Baseline Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 levels in cognitively normal elderly individuals might be predictors of higher rates of progression to AD, and should be further explored as potential biomarkers.
血浆淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ)水平被提议作为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的生物标志物,但研究结果不一致。我们对横断面研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究检查了 AD 和认知正常受试者的血浆 Aβ 水平,以及使用基线血浆 Aβ 水平预测从正常认知到 AD 转化的纵向研究。检索了 Medline 和 EMBASE 数据库以生成相关研究的初始列表,并联系选定的作者以获取其他数据。符合荟萃分析标准的有 12 项横断面研究(n = 1483)和 7 项纵向研究(n = 3920)。使用 Review Manager Version 4.2 采用随机效应模型计算加权均数差(WMD)。在纵向研究中,转化为 AD 的认知正常个体的基线 Aβ1-40 和 Aβ1-42 水平较高(WMD:10.29,z = 3.80,p = 0.0001 和 WMD:8.01,z = 2.76,p = 0.006),且 Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 比值非显著增加(WMD:0.03,z = 1.65,p = 0.10)。在横断面研究中,与认知正常个体相比,AD 患者的 Aβ1-42 水平略低但无统计学意义(WMD:-2.84,z = 1.73,p = 0.08),而 Aβ1-40 水平无显著差异(WMD:3.43,z = 0.40,p = 0.69)。我们的系统评价表明,在认知稳定的个体与发展为 AD 痴呆的个体中,血浆 Aβ 水平的纵向变化存在差异模式。认知正常老年人的基线 Aβ1-40 和 Aβ1-42 水平可能是向 AD 进展率较高的预测因子,应进一步作为潜在的生物标志物进行探索。