• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利多卡因贴剂在经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术的应用。

Use of lidocaine patch for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2011 Jun;24(2):74-80. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.74. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

DOI:10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.74
PMID:21716614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3111563/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lidocaine patch (L5P) has demonstrated short-term efficacy in treating both acute surgical pain and chronic neuropathic pain with tolerable side effects. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is the mainstay of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Sufficient analgesia during PELD surgery makes the patient consider it real MISS. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of lidocaine patch in patients who underwent PELD under local anesthesia.

METHODS

L5P (L group) or placebo (P group) was randomly applied on the skin of the back covering the anticipated path of the working channel before 1 hour of surgery in 100 patients who underwent a single level PELD at L4-L5. Efficacy of the lidocaine patch was assessed by patient's numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain at each stage during the surgery and by a 5-scale grading of the satisfaction with the anesthesia of the operator and patients after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean NRS scores at the stages of needle insertion, skin incision, serial dilation and insertion of working channel, and subcutaneous suture were significantly lower in the L group than the P group. Postoperative operator's and patients' satisfaction scores were also significantly higher in L group than in the P group. There were subtle adverse effects in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

L5P provided better pain relief during PELD, especially at the stage of needle insertion, skin incision, serial dilation and insertion of working channel, and subcutaneous suture. It also provided higher patient and operator postoperative satisfaction, with only subtle adverse effects.

摘要

背景

利多卡因贴剂(L5P)在治疗急性手术疼痛和慢性神经病理性疼痛方面具有短期疗效,且副作用可耐受。经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)是微创脊柱手术(MISS)的主要方法。PELD 手术过程中充分的镇痛可使患者认为其真正微创。本研究旨在评估利多卡因贴剂在局部麻醉下接受 PELD 手术的患者中的疗效和不良反应。

方法

在 100 例行单节段 L4-L5 PELD 的患者中,于手术前 1 小时在背部皮肤(预计工作通道路径)上随机应用 L5P(L 组)或安慰剂(P 组)。通过患者在手术过程中各阶段的数字评分量表(NRS)评估利多卡因贴剂的疗效,并通过手术结束后操作员和患者对麻醉的 5 级评分评估满意度。

结果

与 P 组相比,L 组在针插入、皮肤切开、连续扩张和工作通道插入以及皮下缝合等阶段的 NRS 评分均显著降低。L 组术后操作员和患者的满意度评分也明显高于 P 组。两组均有轻微不良反应。

结论

L5P 在 PELD 过程中提供了更好的镇痛效果,特别是在针插入、皮肤切开、连续扩张和工作通道插入以及皮下缝合阶段。它还提供了更高的患者和操作员术后满意度,仅有轻微的不良反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abb/3111563/436482045fa0/kjpain-24-74-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abb/3111563/436482045fa0/kjpain-24-74-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abb/3111563/436482045fa0/kjpain-24-74-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of lidocaine patch for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.利多卡因贴剂在经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术的应用。
Korean J Pain. 2011 Jun;24(2):74-80. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.74. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
2
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: minimally invasive technique for multiple episodes of lumbar disc herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:治疗多次发作的腰椎间盘突出症的微创技术。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1697-8.
3
Which clinical and radiological variables could predict clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation?哪些临床和影像学变量可以预测经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰骶椎间盘突出症患者的临床结局?
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1338-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
4
Modified Percutaneous Lumbar Foraminoplasty and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Instrument Design, Technique Notes, and 5 Years Follow-up.改良经皮腰椎椎间孔成形术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:器械设计、技术要点及5年随访
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E85-E98.
5
Gradient local anesthesia for percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy at the L5/S1 level: a feasibility study.经皮内镜下腰椎间孔入路 L5/S1 水平椎间盘切除术的梯度局部麻醉:一项可行性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 15;15(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01939-5.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) via a Transforaminal and Interlaminar Combined Approach for Very Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) Between L4/5 and L5/S1 Level.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)联合经椎间孔入路和经椎间孔入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 水平之间非常高迁移腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jun 7;26:e922777. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922777.
7
Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与微创经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04038-6.
8
Comparison of Three Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Methods for Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后复发性疝修补手术中三种微创脊柱手术方法的比较
World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:641-647.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.089. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
A matched comparison of outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a 2-year retrospective cohort study.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较:一项 2 年回顾性队列研究。
Spine J. 2021 Jan;21(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective case-control study: Analysis of the analgesic effect of acetaminophen-mannitol injection after endoscopic lumbar discectomy.一项前瞻性病例对照研究:内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后对乙酰氨基酚-甘露醇注射液镇痛效果的分析。
J Int Med Res. 2025 Sep;53(9):3000605251372518. doi: 10.1177/03000605251372518. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
2
Efficacy of Preemptive Topical Lidocaine 5% Plaster in the Prevention of Post-Craniotomy Pain, a Randomized Clinical Trial.5%利多卡因贴剂预处理预防开颅术后疼痛的疗效:一项随机临床试验
J Pain Res. 2024 Dec 13;17:4251-4261. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S499264. eCollection 2024.
3
A Comparison between Pre-Incisional and Intraoperative Lidocaine Infiltration on Post-Incisional Surgical Pain in Microdiscectomy Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

本文引用的文献

1
[Lidocaine patch for therapy of neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. A clinical case series of 87 patients].[利多卡因贴片治疗神经性和非神经性疼痛。87例临床病例系列]
Nervenarzt. 2010 Dec;81(12):1490-7. doi: 10.1007/s00115-010-3060-2.
2
Comparison of cutaneous anesthetic effect of 8% lidocaine spray with lidocaine patch using current perception threshold test.采用电流感觉阈值试验比较 8%利多卡因喷雾和利多卡因贴剂的皮肤麻醉效果。
Pain Med. 2010 Mar;11(3):472-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00790.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
3
Use of the Synera patch for local anesthesia before vascular access procedures: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
微切口椎间盘切除术术前与术中利多卡因浸润对术后手术疼痛影响的比较:一项随机临床试验研究
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(10):635-640. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.63374.3059.
4
General vs Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)的全身麻醉与局部麻醉:系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Jul;13(6):1671-1688. doi: 10.1177/21925682221147868. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Working towards an ERAS Protocol for Pancreatic Transplantation: A Narrative Review.努力制定胰腺移植的加速康复外科(ERAS)方案:一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 1;10(7):1418. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071418.
6
Epidural Anesthesia With Low Concentration Ropivacaine and Sufentanil for Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.低浓度罗哌卡因与舒芬太尼用于经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术的硬膜外麻醉:一项随机对照试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 31;7:362. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00362. eCollection 2020.
7
Topical agents: a thoughtful choice for multimodal analgesia.局部用制剂:多模式镇痛的明智之选。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;73(5):384-393. doi: 10.4097/kja.20357. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Comparison of the Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation Under Epidural Anesthesia and General Anesthesia.硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉下经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性和有效性比较
Neurospine. 2020 Mar;17(1):254-259. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938366.183. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
9
Regional anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia techniques for spine surgery - a review.脊柱手术的区域麻醉和术后镇痛技术——综述
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Apr;22(1):25-33.
10
A Modified Approach of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) for Far Lateral Disc Herniation at L5-S1 with Foot Drop.一种改良的经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)治疗L5-S1极外侧椎间盘突出症伴足下垂的方法。
Korean J Pain. 2016 Jan;29(1):57-61. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.57. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
在血管通路操作前使用Synera贴片进行局部麻醉:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Pain Med. 2007 Sep;8(6):497-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00204.x.
4
Perioperative pain.围手术期疼痛
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Oct;19(5):556-61. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245284.53152.1f.
5
The treatment of neuropathic pain.神经性疼痛的治疗。
CNS Spectr. 2005 Sep;10(9):698-706. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900019696.
6
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the lidocaine/tetracaine patch for induction of local anesthesia prior to minor dermatologic procedures in geriatric patients.一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,评估利多卡因/丁卡因贴剂在老年患者进行小型皮肤科手术前诱导局部麻醉的效果。
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Mar;31(3):287-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31075.
7
Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure.后外侧经椎间孔选择性内镜下椎间盘切除术及热凝纤维环成形术治疗慢性腰椎间盘源性疼痛:一种微创可视化椎间盘内手术操作
Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):564-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.01.014.
8
Lidocaine patch: double-blind controlled study of a new treatment method for post-herpetic neuralgia.利多卡因贴片:带状疱疹后神经痛新治疗方法的双盲对照研究。
Pain. 1996 Apr;65(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00146-8.