• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案与长方案中口服避孕药的周期安排:一项随机对照试验。

Cycle scheduling with oral contraceptive pills in the GnRH antagonist protocol vs the long protocol: a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

IVI-Madrid, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep;96(3):590-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.022. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.022
PMID:21718992
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare cycle outcomes after scheduling with the standard long protocol versus the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist cycles.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

University-affiliated private assisted reproduction center.

PATIENT(S): Regularly cycling women aged ≤38 years with fewer than three previous IVF attempts were enrolled. Previous low responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, ovarian surgery, or polycystic ovary were exclusion criteria.

INTERVENTION(S): One hundred fifteen patients received OCP (0.030 ethinyl E(2)/0.15 desogestrel) for 12-16 days, and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was started on day 5 after OCP treatment; similarly, 113 patients received the long protocol from day 20-22 of the previous cycle.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate; secondary outcome variables were clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, and miscarriage rate.

RESULT(S): Patients receiving the GnRH antagonist treatment showed a lower peak serum E(2) (1,334 vs. 1,823 pg/mL) but similar peak serum PE (0.58 vs. 0.65 ng/mL), lower duration of the stimulation (10.3 vs. 11.4 days) with similar FSH consumption (1,613 vs. 1,807 IU), and ovarian response (10.2 vs. 11.7 oocytes). No differences were observed in the fertilization rates (68.1% vs. 64.8%), total number of embryos obtained (5.9 vs. 6.2), mean number of embryos transferred (1.8 vs. 1.8), implantation rate (36% vs. 39%), miscarriage rate (8.9% vs. 17%), ongoing pregnancy rate (47.8% vs. 53.9%), or live birth rate (44.3% vs. 47%).

CONCLUSION(S): Comparable outcomes can be obtained using OCP containing 0.030 ethinyl E(2)/0.15 desogestrel to schedule patients undergoing the antagonist protocol.

摘要

目的

比较 GnRH 拮抗剂周期中使用避孕药(OC)与标准长方案对周期结局的影响。

设计

前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

地点

大学附属私立辅助生殖中心。

患者

年龄≤38 岁、既往 IVF 尝试次数少于 3 次的规律排卵患者。既往卵巢低反应、卵巢手术或多囊卵巢病史为排除标准。

干预

115 例患者口服 0.030 炔雌醇/0.15 去氧孕烯 OC 12-16 天,OC 治疗后第 5 天开始控制性卵巢刺激;113 例患者接受长方案,从上次周期第 20-22 天开始。

主要观察指标

主要结局为持续妊娠率;次要结局变量为临床妊娠率、活产率、种植率和流产率。

结果

接受 GnRH 拮抗剂治疗的患者血清 E2 峰值较低(1334 比 1823 pg/ml),但 PE 峰值相似(0.58 比 0.65 ng/ml),刺激持续时间较短(10.3 比 11.4 天),FSH 用量相似(1613 比 1807 IU),卵巢反应相似(10.2 比 11.7 个卵母细胞)。两组受精率(68.1%比 64.8%)、获卵总数(5.9 比 6.2)、平均移植胚胎数(1.8 比 1.8)、种植率(36%比 39%)、流产率(8.9%比 17%)、持续妊娠率(47.8%比 53.9%)和活产率(44.3%比 47.8%)差异均无统计学意义。

结论

OC 方案(含 0.030 炔雌醇/0.15 去氧孕烯)可用于 GnRH 拮抗剂方案的患者,获得的结果相似。

相似文献

1
Cycle scheduling with oral contraceptive pills in the GnRH antagonist protocol vs the long protocol: a randomized, controlled trial.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案与长方案中口服避孕药的周期安排:一项随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep;96(3):590-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.022. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
A randomized controlled trial of increasing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone after initiating a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.一项关于在启动促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂后增加重组促卵泡激素用于体外受精-胚胎移植的随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.040. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
3
Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes.对于既往体外受精结局不佳的患者,在促性腺激素刺激前,黄体期雌二醇贴片与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂抑制方案对比微剂量促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案的研究
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.024. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
4
[Effect of desogestrel and ethinyl estradiol pretreatment in superovulation cycles with short protocol].去氧孕烯与炔雌醇预处理在短方案超排卵周期中的作用
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Feb;43(2):102-5.
5
IVF/ICSI outcomes of the OCP plus GnRH agonist protocol versus the OCP plus GnRH antagonist fixed protocol in women with PCOS: a randomized trial.多囊卵巢综合征患者中口服避孕药加 GnRH 激动剂方案与口服避孕药加 GnRH 拮抗剂固定方案的 IVF/ICSI 结局:一项随机试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;286(3):763-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2348-9. Epub 2012 May 9.
6
A randomized prospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated with oral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization.一项随机前瞻性试验,比较在体外受精前接受口服避孕药预处理的女性中,促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂/重组促卵泡生成素(rFSH)与GnRH激动剂/rFSH的效果。
Fertil Steril. 2005 Feb;83(2):321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.076.
7
Comparison of GnRH antagonist with long GnRH agonist protocol after OCP pretreatment in PCOs patients.OCP 预处理后 GnRH 拮抗剂与长 GnRH 激动剂方案在 PCOS 患者中的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Sep;282(3):319-25. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1429-x. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
8
Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.非月经周期启动卵巢刺激:一项病例对照研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Oct;288(4):901-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2794-z. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
9
Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol?低反应者的管理:一种新型促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂/来曲唑方案能否改善结局?
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.013. Epub 2007 May 4.
10
Programming in vitro fertilization retrievals during working days after a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol with estrogen pretreatment: does the length of exposure to estradiol impact on controlled ovarian hyperstimulation outcomes?在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中进行雌激素预处理后,在工作日进行体外受精取卵:暴露于雌二醇的时间长度是否会影响控制性卵巢过度刺激的结局?
Fertil Steril. 2011 Oct;96(4):872-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1138. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.辅助生殖的控制性卵巢刺激方案:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2.
2
Influence of parental age on chromosomal abnormalities in PGT-A embryos: exponentially increasing in the mother and completely null in the father.父母年龄对胚胎植入前遗传学检测-非整倍体(PGT-A)胚胎染色体异常的影响:母亲年龄呈指数增长,而父亲年龄则完全无影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03462-0.
3
Previous Use of Combined Oral Contraception in High Complexity Assisted Reproduction Treatments in Protocol with Oral Progestin - Previous use of COC and ART.
在口服孕激素方案的高复杂性辅助生殖治疗中联合口服避孕药的既往使用情况——联合口服避孕药和辅助生殖技术的既往使用情况。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024 Dec 3;28(4):639-649. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240058.
4
Live birth rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与黄体期促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射中的活产率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023 Dec 14;26:e2. doi: 10.1017/erm.2023.25.
5
What is the optimal GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation during ART treatment? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.ART 治疗中卵巢刺激时最佳 GnRH 拮抗剂方案是什么?系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2023 May 2;29(3):307-326. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac040.
6
Association between clinical and IVF laboratory parameters and miscarriage after single euploid embryo transfers.临床和体外受精实验室参数与单倍体胚胎移植后流产的关系。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Dec 14;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00870-6.
7
Novel Physiology and Definition of Poor Ovarian Response; Clinical Recommendations.卵巢反应不良的新生理学和定义;临床建议。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 19;21(6):2110. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062110.
8
Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4.波塞冬3组和4组的管理策略
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 11;10:614. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00614. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparison of pre-treatment with OCPs or estradiol valerate vs. no pre-treatment prior to GnRH antagonist used for IVF cycles: An RCT.用于体外受精周期的促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂治疗前使用口服避孕药或戊酸雌二醇与不进行预处理的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Aug;16(8):535-540.
10
Oral contraceptive pill, progestogen or oestrogen pretreatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.口服避孕药、孕激素或雌激素预处理用于接受辅助生殖技术的女性的卵巢刺激方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD006109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006109.pub3.