Suppr超能文献

综述:无分类一次性社会困境中的公共物品博弈论

Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.

机构信息

Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Peter Merian-Weg 6, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

Abstract

We review the theory of public goods in biology. In the N-person prisoner's dilemma, where the public good is a linear function of the individual contributions, cooperation requires some form of assortment, for example due to kin discrimination, population viscosity or repeated interactions. In most social species ranging from bacteria to humans, however, public goods are usually a non-linear function of the contributions, which makes cooperation possible without assortment. More specifically, a polymorphic state can be stable in which cooperators and non-cooperators coexist. The existence of mixed equilibria in public goods games is a fundamental result in the study of cooperation that has been overlooked so far, because of the disproportionate attention given to the two- and N-person prisoner's dilemma. Methods and results from games with pairwise interactions or linear benefits cannot, in general, be extended to the analysis of public goods. Game theory helps explain the production of public goods in one-shot, N-person interactions without assortment, it leads to predictions that can be easily tested and allows a prescriptive approach to cooperation.

摘要

我们回顾了生物学中公共物品的理论。在 N 人囚徒困境中,公共物品是个人贡献的线性函数,合作需要某种形式的分类,例如由于亲缘歧视、种群粘性或重复相互作用。然而,在从细菌到人类的大多数社会物种中,公共物品通常是非线性函数的贡献,这使得没有分类也可以进行合作。更具体地说,多态状态可以是稳定的,其中合作者和非合作者共存。在公共物品博弈中存在混合均衡是合作研究中的一个基本结果,迄今为止一直被忽视,因为过分关注二人和 N 人囚徒困境。来自具有成对相互作用或线性收益的博弈的方法和结果通常不能扩展到公共物品的分析。博弈论有助于解释没有分类的一次性 N 人互动中公共物品的产生,它导致了可以轻松测试的预测,并允许对合作进行规定性的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验