Suppr超能文献

森林生态系统恢复过程中土壤微生物群落的演替模式。

Soil microbial community successional patterns during forest ecosystem restoration.

机构信息

Soil Biology Group, School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep;77(17):6158-64. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00764-11. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

Abstract

Soil microbial community characterization is increasingly being used to determine the responses of soils to stress and disturbances and to assess ecosystem sustainability. However, there is little experimental evidence to indicate that predictable patterns in microbial community structure or composition occur during secondary succession or ecosystem restoration. This study utilized a chronosequence of developing jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest ecosystems, rehabilitated after bauxite mining (up to 18 years old), to examine changes in soil bacterial and fungal community structures (by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis [ARISA]) and changes in specific soil bacterial phyla by 16S rRNA gene microarray analysis. This study demonstrated that mining in these ecosystems significantly altered soil bacterial and fungal community structures. The hypothesis that the soil microbial community structures would become more similar to those of the surrounding nonmined forest with rehabilitation age was broadly supported by shifts in the bacterial but not the fungal community. Microarray analysis enabled the identification of clear successional trends in the bacterial community at the phylum level and supported the finding of an increase in similarity to nonmined forest soil with rehabilitation age. Changes in soil microbial community structure were significantly related to the size of the microbial biomass as well as numerous edaphic variables (including pH and C, N, and P nutrient concentrations). These findings suggest that soil bacterial community dynamics follow a pattern in developing ecosystems that may be predictable and can be conceptualized as providing an integrated assessment of numerous edaphic variables.

摘要

土壤微生物群落特征的描述越来越多地被用于确定土壤对压力和干扰的响应,并评估生态系统的可持续性。然而,几乎没有实验证据表明,在次生演替或生态系统恢复过程中,微生物群落结构或组成会出现可预测的模式。本研究利用了一个在铝土矿开采(最多 18 年)后恢复的发展中的桉树(Eucalyptus marginata)森林生态系统的时间序列,来研究土壤细菌和真菌群落结构(通过自动核糖体基因间隔区分析[ARISA])的变化,以及通过 16S rRNA 基因微阵列分析特定土壤细菌门的变化。本研究表明,这些生态系统中的采矿显著改变了土壤细菌和真菌群落结构。随着恢复年龄的增加,土壤微生物群落结构将变得更类似于周围未开采森林的假说得到了广泛的支持,这主要是由于细菌群落的变化。微阵列分析能够在细菌门水平上识别出明显的细菌群落演替趋势,并支持随着恢复年龄的增加与未开采森林土壤相似性增加的发现。土壤微生物群落结构的变化与微生物生物量的大小以及许多土壤变量(包括 pH 值和 C、N 和 P 养分浓度)显著相关。这些发现表明,土壤细菌群落动态遵循一个发展中的生态系统的模式,该模式可能是可预测的,并可被视为对众多土壤变量的综合评估。

相似文献

1
Soil microbial community successional patterns during forest ecosystem restoration.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep;77(17):6158-64. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00764-11. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
4
Soil Bacterial and Fungal Communities Show Distinct Recovery Patterns during Forest Ecosystem Restoration.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jun 30;83(14). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00966-17. Print 2017 Jul 15.
5
Microbial community structure and density under different tree species in an acid forest soil (Morvan, France).
Microb Ecol. 2005 Nov;50(4):614-25. doi: 10.1007/s00248-005-5130-8. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
7
Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in a genetically modified (GM) rice ecosystem.
Microb Ecol. 2011 Apr;61(3):646-59. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9776-5. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
8
9
Phosphate addition and plant species alters microbial community structure in acidic upland grassland soil.
Microb Ecol. 2009 Jan;57(1):4-13. doi: 10.1007/s00248-008-9399-2. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
10
Microbial community succession and bacterial diversity in soils during 77,000 years of ecosystem development.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Apr;64(1):129-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00444.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Soil microbial community responses to active and passive restoration of selectively logged Bornean tropical forest.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 22;16:1570294. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570294. eCollection 2025.
4
Microbiome science of human excrement composting.
ISME J. 2024 Jan 8;18(1). doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae228.
6
Practical applications of soil microbiota to improve ecosystem restoration: current knowledge and future directions.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Feb;100(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/brv.13124. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
ribosort: a program for automated data preparation and exploratory analysis of microbial community fingerprints.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):95-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01901.x.
2
The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks.
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Jul;8(7):523-9. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2367.
3
Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil.
ISME J. 2010 Oct;4(10):1340-51. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.58. Epub 2010 May 6.
4
Microbial secondary succession in a chronosequence of chalk grasslands.
ISME J. 2010 May;4(5):711-5. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.11. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
5
Soil functional diversity analysis of a bauxite-mined restoration chronosequence.
Microb Ecol. 2010 May;59(4):710-23. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9621-x. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
6
Vegetation and soil environment influence the spatial distribution of root-associated fungi in a mature beech-maple forest.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(24):7639-48. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01648-09. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
7
Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers?
Science. 2009 Jul 31;325(5940):573-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1172975.
8
Spatial patterns of bacterial taxa in nature reflect ecological traits of deep branches of the 16S rRNA bacterial tree.
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;11(12):3096-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02014.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
9
Exploration of hitherto-uncultured bacteria from the rhizosphere.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Sep;69(3):313-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00702.x. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验