• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《言语残疾指数》法语版:验证及与《嗓音残疾指数》的比较

The French version of Speech Handicap Index: validation and comparison with the Voice Handicap Index.

作者信息

Degroote Gaëlle, Simon Jézabelle, Borel Stéphanie, Crevier-Buchman Lise

机构信息

Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(1):20-5. doi: 10.1159/000328982.

DOI:10.1159/000328982
PMID:21734397
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to adapt the Speech Handicap Index (SHI) in French, to compare it with the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and to study its relevance in dysarthric patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-nine subjects filled out the French versions of the SHI and VHI. SHI test-retest reliability was performed on 82 subjects. Psychometric properties were analyzed in 112 healthy controls and 89 patients with speech disorders. Mean scores of 89 speech-disordered and 28 dysphonic patients were obtained.

RESULTS

For SHI, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.9) and test-retest reliability (Spearman’s r > 0.75) were high. Mean scores were significantly different between healthy subjects (8/120) and patients (52/120) (p < 0.0001). Scores were statistically different between dysphonic (40/120) and speech-disordered patients (52/120) (p < 0.05), and also between patients with oropharyngeal surgery (44/120) and dysarthric patients (57/120) (p < 0.05). Patients with speech difficulties had higher scores on the SHI than dysphonic patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The French SHI is a reliable and sensitive tool. It can be proposed to all patients with speech disorders. The contrasting results between the SHI and the VHI highlight the importance in giving the appropriate questionnaire tailored to the patient’s pathology.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将言语障碍指数(SHI)改编为法语版本,将其与嗓音障碍指数(VHI)进行比较,并研究其在构音障碍患者中的相关性。

患者与方法

229名受试者填写了SHI和VHI的法语版本。对82名受试者进行了SHI重测信度测试。在112名健康对照者和89名言语障碍患者中分析了心理测量学特性。获得了89名言语障碍患者和28名发声障碍患者的平均得分。

结果

对于SHI,内部一致性(Cronbach's α>0.9)和重测信度(Spearman's r>0.75)较高。健康受试者(8/120)和患者(52/120)之间的平均得分有显著差异(p<0.0001)。发声障碍患者(40/120)和言语障碍患者(52/120)之间的得分有统计学差异(p<0.05),口咽手术患者(44/120)和构音障碍患者(57/120)之间的得分也有统计学差异(p<0.05)。有言语困难的患者在SHI上的得分高于发声障碍患者(p<0.05)。

结论

法语版SHI是一种可靠且敏感的工具。可推荐给所有言语障碍患者。SHI和VHI之间的对比结果凸显了根据患者病情提供合适问卷的重要性。

相似文献

1
The French version of Speech Handicap Index: validation and comparison with the Voice Handicap Index.《言语残疾指数》法语版:验证及与《嗓音残疾指数》的比较
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(1):20-5. doi: 10.1159/000328982.
2
[Adaptation and validation to the Spanish of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30) and its shortened version (VHI-10)].[嗓音障碍指数(VHI - 30)及其简化版(VHI - 10)的西班牙语改编与验证]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2007 Nov;58(9):386-92.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Italian.嗓音障碍指数的跨文化调适与义大利验证。
J Voice. 2010 Nov;24(6):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.006. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
4
[The Voice Handicap Index: impact of the translation in French on the validation].[嗓音障碍指数:法语翻译对其验证的影响]
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2004;125(5):307-12.
5
Validation of the Italian Voice Handicap Index-10.验证意大利嗓音障碍指数-10。
J Voice. 2014 Mar;28(2):263.e17-263.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
6
Adaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 into Serbian.将嗓音障碍指数(VHI)-30改编并验证为塞尔维亚语版本。
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):758.e1-758.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Validation of the voice handicap index using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析验证嗓音障碍指数
J Voice. 2007 May;21(3):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.09.007. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
8
Speech and voice outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer and evaluation of the University of Washington Quality of Life speech domain.口咽癌的言语和嗓音结果以及华盛顿大学生活质量言语领域评估
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Feb;34(1):34-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01830.x.
9
The Validation and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Speech Handicap Index for Patients With Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer.口腔和口咽癌患者中文版言语障碍指数的效度和信度
J Voice. 2016 Mar;30(2):247.e23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
[Validation of a self assessment for speech disorders (Phonation Handicap Index)].[言语障碍自我评估(发声障碍指数)的验证]
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009;130(1):45-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Kannada Version of the Speech Handicap Index in Individuals with Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer.卡纳达语版言语障碍指数在口腔和口咽癌患者中的验证及心理测量学评估。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5019-5027. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02645-2. Epub 2021 May 23.
2
[Systematic retrospective study of oral cancer-related quality of life scale].[口腔癌相关生活质量量表的系统回顾性研究]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 1;36(4):410-420. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.04.012.
3
Validity of patient-reported swallowing and speech outcomes in relation to objectively measured oral function among patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
在接受口腔或口咽癌治疗的患者中,患者报告的吞咽和言语结果与客观测量的口腔功能之间的相关性。
Dysphagia. 2015 Apr;30(2):196-204. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9595-9. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
The dysarthria impact profile: a preliminary French experience with Parkinson's disease.构音障碍影响量表:帕金森病的初步法国经验。
Parkinsons Dis. 2013;2013:403680. doi: 10.1155/2013/403680. Epub 2013 May 23.