Center for Decision Research, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611414726. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
There is scant evidence that incidental cues in the environment significantly alter people's political judgments and behavior in a durable way. We report that a brief exposure to the American flag led to a shift toward Republican beliefs, attitudes, and voting behavior among both Republican and Democratic participants, despite their overwhelming belief that exposure to the flag would not influence their behavior. In Experiment 1, which was conducted online during the 2008 U.S. presidential election, a single exposure to an American flag resulted in a significant increase in participants' Republican voting intentions, voting behavior, political beliefs, and implicit and explicit attitudes, with some effects lasting 8 months after the exposure to the prime. In Experiment 2, we replicated the findings more than a year into the current Democratic presidential term. These results constitute the first evidence that nonconscious priming effects from exposure to a national flag can bias the citizenry toward one political party and can have considerable durability.
几乎没有证据表明环境中的偶然提示会以持久的方式显著改变人们的政治判断和行为。我们报告说,短暂接触美国国旗会导致共和党参与者和民主党参与者的共和党信仰、态度和投票行为发生转变,尽管他们坚信接触国旗不会影响他们的行为。在 2008 年美国总统选举期间进行的在线实验 1 中,单次接触美国国旗会显著增加参与者的共和党投票意愿、投票行为、政治信仰以及内隐和外显态度,其中一些影响在接触主刺激后持续了 8 个月。在实验 2 中,我们在当前民主党总统任期一年多后复制了这些发现。这些结果首次证明,接触国旗产生的非意识启动效应会使民众偏向一个政党,并具有相当的持久性。