Biomechatronics Group, Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 75 Amherst Street E14-348U, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 7;279(1728):457-64. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1194. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
Over time, leg prostheses have improved in design, but have been incapable of actively adapting to different walking velocities in a manner comparable to a biological limb. People with a leg amputation using such commercially available passive-elastic prostheses require significantly more metabolic energy to walk at the same velocities, prefer to walk slower and have abnormal biomechanics compared with non-amputees. A bionic prosthesis has been developed that emulates the function of a biological ankle during level-ground walking, specifically providing the net positive work required for a range of walking velocities. We compared metabolic energy costs, preferred velocities and biomechanical patterns of seven people with a unilateral transtibial amputation using the bionic prosthesis and using their own passive-elastic prosthesis to those of seven non-amputees during level-ground walking. Compared with using a passive-elastic prosthesis, using the bionic prosthesis decreased metabolic cost by 8 per cent, increased trailing prosthetic leg mechanical work by 57 per cent and decreased the leading biological leg mechanical work by 10 per cent, on average, across walking velocities of 0.75-1.75 m s(-1) and increased preferred walking velocity by 23 per cent. Using the bionic prosthesis resulted in metabolic energy costs, preferred walking velocities and biomechanical patterns that were not significantly different from people without an amputation.
随着时间的推移,腿部假肢在设计上不断改进,但仍无法像生物肢体那样主动适应不同的行走速度。使用这种市售的被动弹性假肢的截肢者在以相同速度行走时需要消耗更多的代谢能量,与非截肢者相比,他们更喜欢走得更慢,且生物力学模式异常。已经开发出一种仿生假肢,在平地行走时模拟生物踝关节的功能,特别是提供了一系列行走速度所需的净正功。我们比较了 7 名单侧胫骨截肢者使用仿生假肢和他们自己的被动弹性假肢与 7 名非截肢者在平地行走时的代谢能量成本、首选速度和生物力学模式。与使用被动弹性假肢相比,使用仿生假肢平均可使代谢成本降低 8%,使跟随假肢腿机械功增加 57%,使生物主导腿机械功减少 10%,在 0.75-1.75 m/s 的行走速度范围内,首选行走速度提高 23%。使用仿生假肢的代谢能量成本、首选行走速度和生物力学模式与未截肢者没有显著差异。