• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现有监狱工作人员实施的动机性访谈:释放后对药物使用影响的随机对照研究。

Motivational Interviewing delivered by existing prison staff: a randomized controlled study of effectiveness on substance use after release.

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, Clinical Neuroscience, Kompetenscentrum för psykoterapi, Liljeholmstorg 7A, plan 6, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(12):1477-85. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.591880. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

DOI:10.3109/10826084.2011.591880
PMID:21756034
Abstract

A sample of 296 drug-using inmates in 14 Swedish prisons was randomized during 2004-2006 into three intervention groups; Motivational Interviewing delivered by counselors with workshop-only training, or by counselors with workshop training followed by peer group supervision, and controls. Drug and alcohol use was measured by the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) at intake and at 10 months after release. Complete data from 114 clients were analyzed by a stepwise regression analysis. All three groups reduced alcohol and drug use. Limitations in the study are discussed and future research is suggested. The study is financed by grants from the Research Committee of the National Prison and Probation Administration.

摘要

2004-2006 年期间,瑞典 14 所监狱中的 296 名吸毒囚犯被随机分为三组:接受仅参加工作坊的辅导员进行的动机访谈、接受参加工作坊培训后再接受同伴监督的辅导员进行的动机访谈,以及对照组。在入组时和释放后 10 个月,使用成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)来测量药物和酒精使用情况。对 114 名客户的完整数据进行逐步回归分析。所有三组都减少了酒精和药物的使用。讨论了研究中的局限性,并提出了未来的研究建议。该研究由国家监狱和缓刑管理局研究委员会资助。

相似文献

1
Motivational Interviewing delivered by existing prison staff: a randomized controlled study of effectiveness on substance use after release.现有监狱工作人员实施的动机性访谈:释放后对药物使用影响的随机对照研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(12):1477-85. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.591880. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
2
Learning motivational interviewing in a real-life setting: a randomised controlled trial in the Swedish Prison Service.在现实环境中学习动机性访谈:瑞典监狱管理局的一项随机对照试验
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Jul;21(3):177-88. doi: 10.1002/cbm.792. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
3
Randomized trial of training and supervision in motivational interviewing with adolescent drug treatment practitioners.针对青少年药物治疗从业者进行动机性访谈培训与监督的随机试验。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jul;37(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.11.001. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
4
Motivational interviewing with hazardous drinkers.对危险饮酒者进行动机性访谈。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Feb;19(2):103-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00200.x.
5
Motivational interviewing for adolescent substance use: a pilot study.针对青少年物质使用的动机性访谈:一项试点研究。
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Aug;37(2):167-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.08.020.
6
Cluster randomised trial of the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for universal prevention.群组随机对照试验:动机性访谈在普遍性预防中的效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Apr 1;114(2-3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.028. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
7
Motivational tools to improve probationer treatment outcomes.改善缓刑人员治疗效果的激励工具。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 May 22.
8
Deterioration over time in effect of Motivational Interviewing in reducing drug consumption and related risk among young people.随着时间推移,动机性访谈在减少年轻人药物消费及相关风险方面的效果逐渐恶化。
Addiction. 2005 Apr;100(4):470-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01013.x.
9
Effects of motivational interviewing training on mental health therapist behavior.动机性访谈培训对心理健康治疗师行为的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 May 20;82(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
10
Using distance education to promote the transfer of motivational interviewing skills among behavioral health professionals.利用远程教育促进行为健康专业人员间动机性访谈技能的传授。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Mar;26(2):141-8. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00167-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Interventions for Prisoners with Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.针对患有精神障碍和物质使用障碍囚犯的心理社会干预措施:一项系统评价
Indian J Psychol Med. 2022 May;44(3):211-217. doi: 10.1177/02537176211061655. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
The feasibility of following up prisoners, with mental health problems, after release: a pilot trial employing an innovative system, for engagement and retention in research, with a harder-to-engage population.对出狱后有心理健康问题的囚犯进行随访的可行性:一项采用创新系统的试点试验,旨在使更难接触的人群参与和保留在研究中。
Trials. 2018 Oct 1;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2911-1.
3
The language of change among criminal justice clients: Counselor language, client language, and client substance use outcomes.
罪犯司法矫正对象的语言变化:咨询师语言、对象语言与对象的物质使用结果。
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Apr;74(4):626-636. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22534. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
4
Are Non-Pharmacological Interventions Effective in Reducing Drug Use and Criminality? A Systematic and Meta-Analytical Review with an Economic Appraisal of These Interventions.非药物干预措施在减少药物使用和犯罪方面是否有效?对这些干预措施进行经济评估的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 29;13(10):966. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13100966.
5
Drug Toxicity Deaths after Release from Incarceration in Ontario, 2006-2013: Review of Coroner's Cases.2006 - 2013年安大略省出狱后药物毒性死亡情况:验尸官案件回顾
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0157512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157512. eCollection 2016.
6
Motivational Interviewing Fidelity in a Community Corrections Setting: Treatment Initiation and Subsequent Drug Use.社区矫正环境中的动机性访谈忠诚度:治疗启动与后续药物使用情况
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jun;65:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders.针对吸毒罪犯的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 2;2015(6):CD010862. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010862.pub2.
8
Self-Report After Randomly Assigned Supervision Does not Predict Ability to Practice Motivational Interviewing.随机分配监督后的自我报告并不能预测实施动机性访谈的能力。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Oct;57:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
9
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of persons during imprisonment and in the year after release.一项关于改善在押人员及出狱后一年内人员健康的干预措施的随机对照试验的系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):e13-33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302498. Epub 2015 Feb 25.