Suppr超能文献

不同血细胞分离机在多次供者血小板单采过程中的血小板募集情况存在差异。

Platelet Recruitment during Multiple Donor Platelet Apheresis Differs between Cell Separators.

作者信息

Fontana Stefano, Keller Peter, Taleghani Behrouz Mansouri

机构信息

Blood Transfusion Service of the Swiss Red Cross, Division of Transfusion Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Transfus Med Hemother. 2011;38(3):195-198. doi: 10.1159/000328634. Epub 2011 May 11.

Abstract

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of platelets (PLT) during donor PLT apheresis may facilitate the harvest of multiple units within a single donation. METHODS: We compared two PLT apheresis procedures (Amicus and Trima Accel) in a prospective, randomized, paired cross-over study in 60 donors. The 120 donations were compared for depletion of circulating PLT in the donors, PLT yields and PLT recruitment. A recruitment was defined as ratio of total PLT yield and donor PLT depletion > 1. RESULTS: Despite comparable differences of pre- and post-apheresis PLT counts (87 × 10(9)/l in Trima Accel vs. 92 × 10(9)/l in Amicus, p = 0.383), PLT yields were higher with Trima Accel (7.48 × 10(11) vs. 6.06 × 10(11), p < 0.001), corresponding to a higher PLT recruitment (1.90 vs. 1.42, p < 0.001). We observed a different increase of WBC counts after aphereses, which was more pronounced with Trima Accel than with Amicus (1.30 × 10(9)/l vs. 0.46 × 10(9)/l, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both procedures induced PLT recruitment. This was higher in Trima Accel, contributing to a higher yield in spite of a comparable depletion of circulating PLT in the donors. This recruitment facilitates the harvest of multiple units within a single donation and seems to be influenced by the procedure utilized. The different increases of circulating donor white blood cells after donation need further investigation.

摘要

摘要

背景:在捐献者血小板单采过程中募集血小板(PLT)可能有助于在单次捐献中采集多个单位的血小板。方法:我们在一项针对60名捐献者的前瞻性、随机、配对交叉研究中比较了两种血小板单采程序(Amicus和Trima Accel)。对120次捐献进行比较,观察捐献者循环血小板的消耗情况、血小板产量和血小板募集情况。血小板募集定义为总血小板产量与捐献者血小板消耗的比值>1。结果:尽管单采前后血小板计数的差异具有可比性(Trima Accel组为87×10⁹/L,Amicus组为92×10⁹/L,p = 0.383),但Trima Accel的血小板产量更高(7.48×10¹¹ vs. 6.06×10¹¹,p < 0.001),对应的血小板募集率也更高(1.90 vs. 1.42,p < 0.001)。我们观察到单采后白细胞计数有不同程度的升高,Trima Accel比Amicus更明显(1.30×10⁹/L vs. 0.46×10⁹/L,p < 0.001)。结论:两种程序均能诱导血小板募集。Trima Accel的血小板募集率更高,尽管捐献者循环血小板的消耗程度相当,但仍有助于提高产量。这种募集有助于在单次捐献中采集多个单位的血小板,并且似乎受所采用程序的影响。单采后捐献者循环白细胞的不同升高情况需要进一步研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Single donor versus pooled random donor platelet concentrates.单供体与混合随机供体血小板浓缩物
Curr Opin Hematol. 2001 Nov;8(6):392-6. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200111000-00013.
9
Plateletapheresis: comparison of processing times, platelet yields, and white blood cell content with several commonly used systems.
J Clin Apher. 1997;12(4):170-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1997)12:4<170::aid-jca3>3.0.co;2-7.
10
Evidence for rapid mobilization of platelets from the spleen during intensive plateletpheresis.
Am J Hematol. 1985 Jun;19(2):161-5. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830190208.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验