Clinical Translational Research Division, The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;4(1):117-27. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.156. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
Mathematical models based on biochemical reaction mechanisms can be a powerful complement to experimental investigations of cell signaling networks. In principle, such models have the potential to find the behaviors that result from well-understood component interactions and their measurable properties, such as concentrations and rate constants. As cancer results from the acquisition of mutations that alter the expression level and/or the biochemistry of proteins encoded by mutated genes, mathematical models of cell signaling networks would also seem to have the potential to predict how these changes alter cell signaling to produce a cancer phenotype. Ras is commonly found in cancer and has been extensively characterized at the level of detail needed to develop such models. Here, we consider how biochemical mechanism-based models have been used to study mutant Ras signaling. These models demonstrate that it is clearly possible to use observable properties of individual reactions to predict how the entire system behaves to produce the high levels of signal that drive the cancer phenotype. These models also demonstrate differences in how models are developed and studied. Their evaluation suggests which approaches are most promising for future work.
基于生化反应机制的数学模型可以成为细胞信号网络实验研究的有力补充。原则上,这些模型有可能找到由已知组件相互作用及其可测量性质(如浓度和速率常数)产生的行为。由于癌症是由于获得改变突变基因编码的蛋白质的表达水平和/或生物化学性质的突变而产生的,因此细胞信号网络的数学模型似乎也有可能预测这些变化如何改变细胞信号以产生癌症表型。Ras 通常存在于癌症中,并且已经在开发此类模型所需的详细程度上进行了广泛的表征。在这里,我们考虑了基于生化机制的模型如何用于研究突变 Ras 信号。这些模型表明,显然可以使用单个反应的可观察性质来预测整个系统的行为,以产生驱动癌症表型的高信号水平。这些模型还展示了模型开发和研究方式的差异。它们的评估表明,哪种方法最有希望用于未来的工作。