• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择作用下群体基因组预测中的偏差。

Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection.

作者信息

Vitezica Z G, Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A

机构信息

Université de Toulouse, TANDEM, INRA/INPT-ENSAT/ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

出版信息

Genet Res (Camb). 2011 Oct;93(5):357-66. doi: 10.1017/S001667231100022X. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1017/S001667231100022X
PMID:21767459
Abstract

Prediction of genetic merit or disease risk using genetic marker information is becoming a common practice for selection of livestock and plant species. For the successful application of genome-wide marker-assisted selection (GWMAS), genomic predictions should be accurate and unbiased. The effect of selection on bias and accuracy of genomic predictions was studied in two simulated animal populations under weak or strong selection and with several heritabilities. Prediction of genetic values was by best-linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using data either from relatives summarized in pseudodata for genotyped individuals (multiple-step method) or using all available data jointly (single-step method). The single-step method combined genomic- and pedigree-based relationship matrices. Predictions by the multiple-step method were biased. Predictions by a single-step method were less biased and more accurate but under strong selection were less accurate. When genomic relationships were shifted by a constant, the single-step method was unbiased and the most accurate. The value of that constant, which adjusts for non-random selection of genotyped individuals, can be derived analytically.

摘要

利用遗传标记信息预测遗传价值或疾病风险正成为家畜和植物品种选育的常用方法。为了成功应用全基因组标记辅助选择(GWMAS),基因组预测应准确且无偏差。在两个模拟动物群体中,研究了在弱选择或强选择以及几种遗传力条件下选择对基因组预测偏差和准确性的影响。遗传值的预测采用最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP),数据来源为要么是根据基因型个体的伪数据汇总的亲属数据(多步法),要么是联合使用所有可用数据(单步法)。单步法结合了基于基因组和系谱的关系矩阵。多步法的预测存在偏差。单步法的预测偏差较小且更准确,但在强选择条件下准确性较低。当基因组关系通过一个常数进行偏移时,单步法无偏差且最为准确。该常数的值可通过分析得出,它用于调整基因型个体的非随机选择。

相似文献

1
Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection.选择作用下群体基因组预测中的偏差。
Genet Res (Camb). 2011 Oct;93(5):357-66. doi: 10.1017/S001667231100022X. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.利用状态一致性和系谱一致性关系对同胞评估性状进行基因组选择的准确性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Feb 25;47(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0084-2.
3
Metafounders are related to F fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluations.元奠基者与F固定指数相关,并减少单步基因组评估中的偏差。
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Mar 10;49(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0309-2.
4
Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction.选择和选择性基因分型对参考群体的影响对基因组预测的偏差和准确性的影响。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Sep;136(5):390-407. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12420. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.当一些动物未使用基因含量多性状BLUP进行基因分型时,利用主基因和多基因遗传进行遗传评估。
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Nov 17;47:89. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0165-x.
6
Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.在不同性状和基因组参数下,基因组估计育种值与传统最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)估计育种值的准确性及选择反应的比较。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Dec;124(6):342-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00700.x.
7
Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) for the estimation of genomic breeding values.用于估计基因组育种值的基因组最佳线性无偏预测(gBLUP)。
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:321-30. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_13.
8
Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.通过使用实现的关系矩阵提高人工选择的准确性。
Genet Res (Camb). 2009 Feb;91(1):47-60. doi: 10.1017/S0016672308009981.
9
Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.跨群体基因组预测的经验性和确定性准确性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Feb 6;47(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0086-0.
10
Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.使用基因分型和非基因分型的韩牛对单性状基因组预测的替代方法进行比较。
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Jan 4;49(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0279-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing the single-step model for predicting fumonisins resistance in maize hybrids accounting for the genotype-by-environment interaction.优化用于预测玉米杂交种中伏马菌素抗性的单步模型,同时考虑基因型与环境的相互作用。
Front Genet. 2025 Jul 2;16:1475452. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1475452. eCollection 2025.
2
Applying the algorithm for Proven and young in GWAS Reveals high polygenicity for key traits in Nellore cattle.在基因组全基因关联研究中应用针对已证实和年轻个体的算法,揭示了内洛尔牛关键性状的高多基因性。
Front Genet. 2025 Apr 30;16:1549284. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1549284. eCollection 2025.
3
Erosion of estimated genomic breeding values with generations is due to long distance associations between markers and QTL.
随着世代推移,估计的基因组育种值出现衰减是由于标记与数量性状基因座之间存在长距离关联。
Genet Sel Evol. 2025 Mar 21;57(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00963-5.
4
Accuracy of Genomic Predictions for Resistance to Gastrointestinal Parasites in Australian Merino Sheep.澳大利亚美利奴羊对胃肠道寄生虫抗性的基因组预测准确性
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jan 26;16(2):159. doi: 10.3390/genes16020159.
5
Genomic selection strategies to overcome genotype by environment interactions in biosecurity-based aquaculture breeding programs.在基于生物安全的水产养殖育种计划中克服基因型与环境相互作用的基因组选择策略。
Genet Sel Evol. 2025 Jan 22;57(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00949-3.
6
Genetic parameters and genome-wide association studies including the X chromosome for various reproduction and semen quality traits in Nellore cattle.内洛尔牛各种繁殖和精液品质性状的遗传参数及全基因组关联研究,包括X染色体。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jan 10;26(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-11193-2.
7
The Effect of Preselection on the Level of Bias and Accuracy in a Broiler Breeder Population, a Simulation Study.预选择对肉种鸡群体偏差水平和准确性的影响:一项模拟研究
J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jul;142(4):392-407. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12908. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
8
Marker effect p-values for single-step GWAS with the algorithm for proven and young in large genotyped populations.在大型基因分型人群中,使用经过验证和新兴的算法进行单步 GWAS 的标记效应 p 值。
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Aug 22;56(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00925-3.
9
Reviewing the definition of mortality in broiler chickens and its implications in genomic evaluations.审查肉鸡死亡率的定义及其在基因组评估中的意义。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae190.
10
Single nucleotide polymorphism profile for quantitative trait nucleotide in populations with small effective size and its impact on mapping and genomic predictions.有效群体规模较小的数量性状核苷酸的单核苷酸多态性图谱及其对作图和基因组预测的影响。
Genetics. 2024 Aug 7;227(4). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyae103.