Moshtagh-Khorasani Majid, Akbarzadeh-T Mohammad-R, Jahangiri Nader, Khoobdel Mehdi
Department of Electrical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
J Res Med Sci. 2009 Mar;14(2):89-103.
Aphasia diagnosis is particularly challenging due to the linguistic uncertainty and vagueness, inconsistencies in the definition of aphasic syndromes, large number of measurements with imprecision, natural diversity and subjectivity in test objects as well as in opinions of experts who diagnose the disease.
Fuzzy probability is proposed here as the basic framework for handling the uncertainties in medical diagnosis and particularly aphasia diagnosis. To efficiently construct this fuzzy probabilistic mapping, statistical analysis is performed that constructs input membership functions as well as determines an effective set of input features.
Considering the high sensitivity of performance measures to different distribution of testing/training sets, a statistical t-test of significance is applied to compare fuzzy approach results with NN results as well as author's earlier work using fuzzy logic. The proposed fuzzy probability estimator approach clearly provides better diagnosis for both classes of data sets. Specifically, for the first and second type of fuzzy probability classifiers, i.e. spontaneous speech and comprehensive model, P-values are 2.24E-08 and 0.0059, respectively, strongly rejecting the null hypothesis.
THE TECHNIQUE IS APPLIED AND COMPARED ON BOTH COMPREHENSIVE AND SPONTANEOUS SPEECH TEST DATA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF FOUR APHASIA TYPES: Anomic, Broca, Global and Wernicke. Statistical analysis confirms that the proposed approach can significantly improve accuracy using fewer Aphasia features.
由于语言的不确定性和模糊性、失语综合征定义的不一致性、大量不精确的测量、测试对象的自然多样性和主观性以及诊断疾病的专家意见,失语症诊断极具挑战性。
本文提出模糊概率作为处理医学诊断尤其是失语症诊断中不确定性的基本框架。为了有效地构建这种模糊概率映射,进行了统计分析,构建输入隶属函数并确定一组有效的输入特征。
考虑到性能指标对测试/训练集不同分布的高敏感性,应用统计显著性t检验将模糊方法的结果与神经网络结果以及作者早期使用模糊逻辑的工作进行比较。所提出的模糊概率估计器方法显然为两类数据集都提供了更好的诊断。具体而言,对于第一类和第二类模糊概率分类器,即自发言语和综合模型,P值分别为2.24E - 08和0.0059,有力地拒绝了原假设。
该技术应用于综合和自发言语测试数据,并对四种失语症类型(命名性失语、布罗卡失语、完全性失语和韦尼克失语)的诊断进行了比较。统计分析证实,所提出的方法使用较少的失语症特征就能显著提高准确性。