Graduate School of Environmental Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jun;184(6):3515-27. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2205-5. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Waste disposal is an important part of the life cycle of a product and is associated with environmental burdens like any other life-cycle stages. In this study, an integrated assessment for solid waste treatment practices, especially household solid waste, was undertaken to evaluate the impact contribution of household solid waste treatment alternatives towards the sustainable development by using Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method. A case study has been investigated under various possible scenarios, such as (1) landfill without landfill gas recovery, (2) landfill with landfill gas recovery and flaring, (3) landfill with landfill gas recovery and electric generation, (4) composting, and (5) incineration. The evaluation utilized the Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method for multiple assessments based on various aspects, such as greenhouse gas emission/reduction, energy generation/consumption, economic benefit, investment and operating cost, and land use burden. The results showed that incineration was the most efficient alternative for greenhouse gas emission reduction, economic benefit, energy recovery, and land use reduction, although it was identified as the most expensive for investment and operating cost, while composting scenario was also an efficient alternative with quite economic benefit, low investment and operating cost, and high reduction of land use, although it was identified as existing greenhouse gas emission and no energy generation. Furthermore, the aim of this study was also to establish localized assessment methods that waste management agencies, environmental engineers, and environmental policy decision makers can use to quantify and compare the contribution to the impacts from different waste treatment options.
废物处理是产品生命周期的重要组成部分,与其他生命周期阶段一样,与环境负担有关。在这项研究中,采用生命周期清单评估方法对固体废物处理实践进行了综合评估,特别是对家庭固体废物进行了评估,以评估家庭固体废物处理替代方案对可持续发展的影响贡献。在各种可能的情况下进行了案例研究,例如:(1)不进行垃圾填埋气回收的垃圾填埋场,(2)进行垃圾填埋气回收和燃烧的垃圾填埋场,(3)进行垃圾填埋气回收和发电的垃圾填埋场,(4)堆肥和(5)焚烧。评估利用生命周期清单评估方法对多种情况进行了评估,例如温室气体排放/减少、能源产生/消耗、经济效益、投资和运营成本以及土地利用负担。结果表明,尽管焚烧在投资和运营成本方面被认为是最昂贵的,但在减少温室气体排放、经济效益、能源回收和土地利用方面,焚烧是最有效的替代方案,而堆肥方案也是一种有效的替代方案,具有相当的经济效益、低投资和运营成本以及高土地利用减少,但它被确定为存在温室气体排放和无能源产生。此外,本研究的目的还在于建立本地化的评估方法,供废物管理机构、环境工程师和环境政策决策者使用,以量化和比较不同废物处理选择对影响的贡献。